版面报道 1
今日《The New York Times Book Review - 04.10.2026》全报共收录 57 篇核心报道。在政经治理、法理制度与公共政策层面,版面重心聚焦于:**版面报道 29**(在本新书中,本·麦金泰尔讲述了一名在伊朗的俄罗斯间谍为了一个不同寻常的要求而背叛祖国的故事。);**版面报道 39**(《关于莱昂·布莱克、阿波罗全球管理以及新华尔街崛起的赤裸真相》,作者:威廉·D·科汉 (William D. Cohan...);**版面报道 41**(在他之后。)。 在本土文化与城市记忆方面,今日重点关注**「版面报道 11」**。
本期特写报道深入探索社会结构转型与文化心态变迁,详见【📖 双语精读】各专题深度报道。
版面报道 1
噢,加拿大!在《真北》(True North)一书中,资深旅行作家保罗·塞鲁横跨其祖辈的国家,以洞察该国与其自身之地的不同。作者:詹妮弗·萨莱 / 第 9 页
2026年10月4日
8 《离场派对》(EXIT PARTY) 作者:艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔 评论员:Lincoln Michel 11 《分手》(THE BREAKUP)
杰里·斯塔尔之最佳(及非最佳)作品集 作者:杰里·斯塔尔 《角落男孩》(CORNER BOY) 新旧徘徊
作者:Christian Robinson 作者:Jaque Jours 《除了我没人》(NOBODY BUT ME) 作者:Sara Lundberg
12 随笔 《吸血鬼采访》50周年 作者:克里斯托弗·赖斯 22 评价
探索食谱集,例如《与孩子一起烹饪的食谱》。 读者来信 读后落泪 致编辑:
我只想补充一点,如果你真的不喜欢那本书,不要只是把它放在“未读完”的书架上。把它撕掉——要痛快地撕! 朱迪思·杰克逊(JUDITH JACKSON) 佛蒙特州,伊拉斯堡 移山
版面报道 10
“阅读不是一种爱好。它是我人生中的第一次‘搞钱’(hustle),”这位喜剧演员在他的新回忆录《九条命,没有妻子,以及 69 个妾》(Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines)中写道,书中还解释了他为何与苏斯博士(Dr. Seuss)产生矛盾。
您如何整理您的书籍? 按主题。当我寻找特定内容时,我喜欢知道该去哪里找。我一直将书视为资源,而非装饰品。所以书架的布局必须对我来说是有逻辑的。
哪些书出现在您的书架上可能会让人们感到惊讶? 大多数人可能不知道我是一个园丁,或者不知道我真正热爱园艺的程度,所以他们可能会对我拥有这么多园艺书感到惊讶。种植植物这件事能教会你耐心。你必须了解某种植物需要什么,给它合适的环境,然后让它成为它应该成为的样子。我认为这其中包含着一个道理。
您写道:“阅读不是一种爱好。它是我人生中的第一次‘搞钱’(hustle)。”请解释一下。 小时候,有很多东西是我接触不到的,但我可以接触到书。所以如果有什么我想理解的东西,我可以去找一本相关的书。历史、宗教、商业、科学、人物。我可以自学。这就是为什么我称之为我的第一次“搞钱”。所谓“搞钱”(hustle),就是想办法利用你拥有的东西来获得你需要的东西。我拥有的是阅读能力,是继续探索的好奇心,以及足够的意识去理解:知道别人不知道的事情可以成为一种优势。
哪些童年时期的书籍和作者至今仍令你记忆犹新? 《瑞士鲁滨逊一家》改变了我的生活。那种冒险精神、那种独创性,以及这个家庭必须想办法生存并利用现有资源创造出一个完整世界的设定,非常吸引我。《安妮日记》是另一本。那时我还小,但我意识到我读到的是一个真正经历过这一切的人写下的文字。这让它变得与众不同。 然后是斯蒂芬·金。在某个时刻我不得不承认:金先生,我尊重您的才华,但我也喜欢睡觉。
您在“Club Shay Shay”的访谈观看次数已超过 8800 万 次。相比之下,书籍的受众规模非常小。为什么还要费心写书? 如果你读过七八百本其他人的自传,你会觉得在某个时刻,你也得把自己的名字加入到这场对话中。尽管一亿次观看可能令人惊叹,但那项作品仍然属于互联网。人类拥有互联网的时间不过短短数年,但书籍我们已经拥有数千年了。将你的故事以一种可以摆在书架上、在人与人之间传递的形式呈现,并且在如今流行的任何平台消失很久之后依然存在,这有着截然不同的意义。
您究竟是怎么跟苏斯博士结仇的? 因为我到处自称“戴帽子的卡特”(Katt in the Hat)并以此赚钱。显然,这会让你收到一份停止并终止函。我当时只是一个试图出名的年轻喜剧演员,没有考虑商标或知识产权。我想的是,“戴帽子的卡特——这很有趣”。而他们的想法则完全不同。
你曾因为读书而陷入麻烦吗? 没有,我几乎被允许阅读任何我想读的东西。我生命中甚至有一段时间,我唯一想做的就是找到禁书名单,以便把每一本都读一遍。因为如果你告诉我一本书是被禁止的,我现在就得知道为什么。什么样的信息会如此具有波动性,以至于有人决定我不应该接触到它?
你最近从书中学到的最有趣的事情是什么? 《妥拉》。全部内容。它提醒了我,我认为你不可能读完一本书而没有任何收获。
你正在组织一场文学晚宴。你会邀请哪三位作家(无论在世与否)? J.R.R. 托尔金、马克·吐温和杰克·伦敦。邀请托尔金是因为我想了解一个人是如何在脑海中构建一个如此详尽的完整世界,并让其他所有人都相信它真实存在的。邀请马克·吐温是因为他懂得如何利用幽默来揭示社会的真相。邀请杰克·伦敦是因为他的写作和生活都有一种无畏的精神。把他们放在一张桌子上,我不确定我是否会说太多话。我只想看看他们会为了什么而争论。 小型出版社的大机遇 独立出版商以及财力并非完全独立的作者,在每周…
为公众的知情权而战。 我们年复一年地将政府告上法庭,以确保政府不能在健康、安全和教育等议题上向纳税人隐瞒信息。 纽约时报 WORDLE, CONNECTIONS, SPELLING BEE, MINIS 等更多游戏!
您的每日益智之选——现已出书。 Spelling Bee, Minis 等更多游戏 纽约时报游戏 由 JOEL FAGLIANO 编辑
Lex Croucher、Mollyhall Seeley 和 Elizabeth DeLozier 的新书将带您前往神奇的新世界。 阅读《布里亚·琼斯的非魔法生活》(READING THE UNMAGICAL LIFE OF BRIAR JONES,Harper Voyager 出版,447 pp., $32)时——这是 Croucher 的首部成人小说,此前他写过几部迷人的青少年小说——我完全失去了对时间的掌控。我如此地沉浸在书中,如此地投入在作者的想象力中,以…
尼克·科恩(Nik Cohn)和杰里·斯塔尔(Jerry Stahl)的两部涵盖职业生涯的随笔集,沉醉于生活的边缘,并捕捉往昔的光环。 作者:德怀特·加纳(DWIGHT GARNER) “首先,”迈克尔·金斯利(Michael Kinsley)在他的一部专栏集前言中写道,“我不希望有人因为我把一堆旧文章凑在一起就称之为一本书而对我产生不满。”他喜欢这类书籍(我也一样),因为它们是“一种捕捉近期过去之风味的方式”。 两位长期从事自由撰稿的场景塑造者,尼克·科恩和杰里·…
在艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔的新小说中,两种版本的美国未来发生了剧烈碰撞。
如今,各色美国人都在担心这个国家面临着一个危险的未来。国家是否会陷入内战?还是会堕落为一个反乌托邦的威权国家?在艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔 (Emily St. John Mandel) 雄心勃勃且引人入胜的新小说《离场派对》(Exit Party) 中,答案是:两者皆有可能。 《离场派对》的故事始于 2031 年的洛杉矶,此时“美国在一次政变后分崩离析”,各州相继脱离联邦,且“一个月内便爆发了战争”。但目前,战斗已经结束,加利福尼亚共和国的宵禁已经解除,人们准备尽情狂…
哦,加拿大! 资深旅行作家保罗·塞鲁横跨其祖辈的故土,以洞察该国与他所在国家的不同之处。 By 詹妮弗·萨莱 在唐纳德·特朗普对待加拿大的标志性“成就”中——发动贸易战、威胁吞并、侮辱其人民、仅仅因为他能这样做就破坏一段长久的联盟——这位总统还设法让一本关于加拿大的旅行书变得出奇地及时。
《真北》是塞鲁北美公路旅行三部曲的最后一本书。 采访片段、新闻报道、历史和文学评论。他钦佩罗伯逊·戴维斯、玛格丽特·艾特伍德和梅维斯·加兰特的作品,尽管爱丽丝·门罗的故事一直让他感到冷漠。“我觉得它们太长且冗赘,”他抱怨道,“它们的景观过于理智、焦虑且局限于室内。” 就塞鲁而言,他通常很有魅力,即使在脾气暴躁时,或者在扮演那个自大的美国人、回忆加拿大人告诉他多么热爱他的作品时也是如此。 《真北》是塞鲁北美公路旅行三部曲的最后一本书,该系列始于《深南》,随后是关于他在…
在本新书中,本·麦金泰尔讲述了一名在伊朗的俄罗斯间谍为了一个不同寻常的要求而背叛祖国的故事。 作者:约瑟夫·芬德(JOSEPH FINDER) 英国作家本·麦金泰尔(Ben Macintyre)凭借将尘封的政府档案转化为扣人心弦的非虚构惊悚小说而取得了辉煌的职业生涯。他的《肉馅行动》(Operation Mincemeat)被改编成了电影和舞台剧,而《朋友中的间谍》(A Spy Among Friends)则被拍成了电视剧。在他的最新作品《红杉》(Redwood)中…
伦敦没有人在事后之前注意到其中隐含的双关含义。 对那些“与上帝作战”的人发布了法特瓦(宗教禁令),已经服刑完毕的囚犯也被处决。“图德党(Tudeh)的确切死亡人数可能永远无法得知,”麦金泰尔写道,“行刑者并没有计数。” 麦金泰尔的结论是,“REDWOOD 案件既是成功也是失败,是一场以胜利和失败告终的计谋,是一项重大成就,也是一个严重的错误,证明了意外后果的反复无常。”他写道,通过煽动伊斯兰共和国的偏执与残暴,并帮助穆拉(伊斯兰教法学者)巩固权力,美国和英国“在无意…
库尔特·安德森的小说将背景设定在 19 年后的未来,讲述了一个在内战导致国家破裂中艰难生存的家庭。 作者:乔纳森·迪 (JONATHAN DEE) 设定在未来的小说并非科幻小说的专属领域;焦虑的时代往往会产生焦虑且带有警示意味的文学反乌托邦,而你记得上一次没感到焦虑是什么时候吗?尤其是 20 世纪,这类愿景层出不穷,其中一些——如《使女的故事》,或出版于 1932 年且日益令人不安的《美丽新世界》——被证明比其他作品更具预言性。不过,将它们理解为对未来的真实押注并不…
这次旅程将带他们穿过重新配置后的美国心脏地带。 但那又怎样?美国小说中早已充斥着家庭剧。在当前这个看似极化、愤怒不可持续,且美国公民机构与理想被肆意践踏的时刻,《分手》(The Breakup)的读者所追求的,是一个关于我们近期未来的愿景——它是暴力的、告诫性的、带有宣泄感的恐怖,但不知为何依然能够生存下去。就这一点而言,安德森提供了让他之前的作品成为畅销书的某种多巴胺快感。在他的 2045 年,依然有萨莉·鲁尼的新小说(一本标题非常有趣的小说),政府甚至向那些雇佣…
安妮·赖斯的儿子讲述其母亲的第一本书如何将个人丧亲之痛转化为一部恐怖经典。 在 20 世纪 80 年代初,我母亲的一小群读者在参加她的一次签书会时穿着戏服。这是第一次发生这种情况。那次活动是在旧金山一家灯光温暖的小书店里举行的安静聚会。窗外,周围由宏伟市政建筑组成的混凝土景观,似乎与郁郁葱葱、橡树遍地的新奥尔良相隔万里——新奥尔良是安妮在当时已出版的几部小说中将其塑造为一个活生生的角色的故乡,而她的名字后来也与这座城市不可分割地联系在一起。 那天晚上人们随兴庆祝的书…
书籍走向成功的道路可能是曲折且不可预测的。 她最喜欢的东西)。在我寻求信息的过程中,唯一的障碍是我自己犹豫是否愿意听到母亲声音中传出的悲恸颤抖,或看到父亲眼中泛起的泪光。 多年来,我继续对我父母进行这场关于他们生命中决定性悲剧的断断续续的采访,而多年来,我的父母以温柔和诚实地回答了每一个问题。如果说这次采访有一个高潮,那么它发生在采访开始近十年后,当时我们三人坐在一间新奥尔良餐厅外的桌旁。母亲的成功让我们在 1988 年搬到了那里,那时我 10 岁。三年后,我终于鼓…
塞巴斯蒂安·巴里的这部小说巡礼了内战后的美国,在那里,残酷无处不在,但爱依然坚韧。 作者:伊恩·麦奎尔 爱尔兰作家塞巴斯蒂安·巴里的最新小说《The Newer World》延续了他早先的两部作品——《Days Without End》(2016)和《A Thousand Moons》(2020)。主角泰尼森·布格罗(Tennyson Bouguereau)是一名于 1840, 左右出生在田纳西州奴隶制下的黑人,他在前两本书中都是次要角色,而新小说前四分之一的大部分…
巴里在探讨黑人音乐激发情感和唤起共情的力量方面表现卓越。 在《月亮》("Moons")中,年轻的温诺娜在同为孤儿的佩格怀中找到了慰藉。 在这两部小说中,巴里明确地表明,一种深层的家庭之爱(无论这种家庭形式多么非传统)可以抵消政治和社会上的残酷,使那些遭受过巨大创伤的人也能忍受生活。这种令人毛骨悚然的暴力与略显泛滥的情感之间不寻常的结合,赋予了这两部早期小说不可否认的原创性和魅力。 《新世界》("The Newer World")有时似乎准备重复其前作所建立的这种慰藉…
对于阿里·埃马纽埃尔来说,争吵、世仇和侮辱不过是日常工作的一部分,他在一部新回忆录中对其职业生涯进行了毫无掩饰的回顾。 作者:亚历山德拉·雅各布斯 (ALEXANDRA JACOBS) 忘掉《奥德赛》吧。在他那节奏短促、充满脏话且带有报复色彩的新书《Roll the Calls》中,阿里·埃马纽埃尔引用了荷马的前作《伊利亚特》,其首个词就是“愤怒”。而“忘掉”并不是他会使用的那个以 F 开头的脏词。 埃马纽埃尔是一位好莱坞超级经纪人——这个词现在被人工智能(A.I.…
一名记者记录了华尔街亿万富翁莱昂·布莱克的兴衰,他曾向杰弗里·爱泼斯坦提供数百万美元。 作者:乔纳森·马勒 (JONATHAN MAHLER) 莱昂·布莱克 2024 年在现代艺术博物馆。 金融家莱昂·布莱克或许有资格在杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的帮凶“恶棍画廊”中占据一面独立的墙。在 2012 年至 2017年之间,布莱克向爱泼斯坦提供了惊人的 $1.58 亿美元——如果你把爱泼斯坦在 2019年于狱中自缢身亡时尚未偿还的一笔巨额贷款计算在内,这个数字将超过 $1.7 亿美…
《关于莱昂·布莱克、阿波罗全球管理以及新华尔街崛起的赤裸真相》,作者:威廉·D·科汉 (William D. Cohan) Portfolio出版社。667页。$40。 利用这笔资金来控制陷入困境的公司,然后随心所欲地处置它们。 正如科汉所阐明的,从挣扎中的企业中榨取利润是一项艰巨的工作,通常涉及违背逻辑的金融工程手段和自我交易。毋庸置疑,布莱克及其合伙人在这些风险投资中的获益远高于他们所收购实体的员工或客户。在一家由阿波罗全球管理拥有的爱荷华州急性护理设施中发生的…
一名记者将一群在那个决定性十年中大获成功的人物聚集在一起。 特朗普总统七月在椭圆形办公室。 作者:RICK PERLSTEIN 有人说,列夫·托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》拥有由数百个有名有姓的角色演绎的无数情节和子情节,根本算不上是一部真正的小说。相反,所有这些细致的叙事特异性,都成了书中论文式批判的素材,而这些批判才真正关乎作者所关注的问题:历史学家如何将历史简化为过于整洁的类别,以此解释事情是如何演变的。“历史科学的任何结论,如果没有批判的最小努力,就会像尘埃一样瓦…
考夫曼通过环环相扣的故事来构建他的叙事。 在他之后。 纳斯鲍姆成为了韦尔奇在叙事上的主要陪衬。她在 20 世纪 70 年代试图将那些在类似《广告狂人》般的办公室世界中疲于奔命的受害者转化为一种政治力量,但很快就撞上了所有 20 世纪末工会组织者都遇到的那堵墙。考夫曼称,在里根入主白宫后不久的 1981 年,一场“前所未有的对工会的攻击”开始了。 这种表述的问题在于,这场攻击绝非前所未有(在 20 世纪 40 年代之前,劳工煽动者经常被枪杀);而且在吉米·卡特总统任期…
在三本新的绘本中,年幼的孩子们在混乱、‘黏稠’且充满养分的家庭纽带中品尝到了独立的滋味。
家庭:离不开,也相处不来。除了长期的心理分析对象,还有谁比那些通过反抗混乱、黏稠且——在最理想的情况下——充满养分的纽带来尝试独立的孩子更懂得这一点?这是一个贯穿了无数经典儿童文学作品的主题。 三本出色的新书——每一本在想象力、敏感度和工艺上都堪称奇迹——接过了这个接力棒。所有这些书的艺术表现形式在主题和视觉上都如此大胆,以至于我在第一次翻开书页时,如果没惊呼出声,也会默默地在口中说一声“哇”,或者纯粹因为欣喜而大笑。 在这三本书中,克里斯蒂安·罗宾逊 (Chris…
五个 Muégano 彼此肩并肩地连接在一起,兔子的脚在空中滑稽地晃荡着。 也许,是在那种昏昏欲睡的意义上。温柔的(起初是这样)水流带着他进行一场如梦似幻的旅程,穿过一片包围四周的森林,然后进入更广阔的世界,在那里,他发现了爱情(或者至少是友谊)以及危险,除此之外还有其他事物。 但不必担心:三个穿着叶裙的森林孩子——也许是精灵——充当守护者,防止麻烦失控。男孩在改变中地保持着原样,漂回母亲身边,手里紧握着一颗种子,回到家后他将其种下。它也将生长。 伦德伯格(Lund…
本周 | 上周 小说 在榜周数 | 1 《HOLLOW BONES》,作者 Jodi Picoult。(Ballantine) 一位负责罗德岛州应急准备部的女性及其身为警察测谎专家的丈夫,面临着婚姻危机。 1 2 $^{2}$ 《THEO OF GOLDEN》,作者 Allen Levi。(Atria) 一个男人前往南方的一个小镇,在那里他购买当地居民的铅笔画,并用它们交换故事。 42 3 《THE THOROUGHBREDS》,作者 Elin H…
版面报道 46
《台北故事》(TAIPEI STORY),R.F. Kuang 著。(William Morrow 出版,279 pp. $32.) Kuang 是一位成功的奇幻小说作家,在这部关于一名在台湾漂泊的美国学生的现实主义小说中,她再次探讨了语言与帝国之间的联系。通过聚焦于期中考试、姐妹关系和性等日常戏剧,她证明了自己在文学小说方面的造诣与在投机小说(speculative fiction)领域一样高;如果你不提前了解,很难想象她还能写其他风格的作品。
《塔丘:反叛边缘的种植园》(TOWER HILL: A Plantation on the Edge of Rebellion),Alan Taylor 著。(Norton 出版,324 pp. $35.) 在这部关于弗吉尼亚州 Blow 种植园的详尽研究中——该地距离 1831 年纳特·特纳(Nat Turner)起义的地点不远——普利策奖得主、历史学家 Taylor 试图将传统与真相区分开来,仔细审视美国奴隶主内心交织的高尚同情心与令人胆寒的残酷。其结果就像是非…
一名英国特种部队士兵讲述了他与内罗比一家酒店及办公综合体内的索马里族恐怖分子单位战斗的经历。 | 1 | 5 LIVE LAUGH LOVE,作者 Kristin Kobes Du Mez。(Liveright) 美国白人基督教女性地位的历史。 1 6 7 THIS IS ME,作者 Hayden Panettiere。(Grand Central) 已故女演员描述了她如何应对名声。 6 7 1 THE COUNTERREVOLUTION,作者 Vict…
《影子票》(SHADOW TICKET),作者:托马斯·品钦 (Thomas Pynchon)。(企鹅出版社。304 pp. $20。) 在经济大萧条时期的威斯康星州,不情愿担任私家侦探的希克斯·麦克塔加特 (Hicks McTaggart) 接到了一项看似简单的任务:寻找并带回一名离家出走的奶酪继承人。这份工作将他带到了东欧,在那里,他陷入了一个由摇摆舞者、摩托车法外之徒、苏联特工和纳粹组成的世界,这些元素以典型的品钦式冗余风格呈现。 《巴塞尔之塔:掌控世界的秘密…
让忙碌的早晨不再如此手忙脚乱。
探索如“10分钟或更短时间搞定早餐”之类的食谱集。 报道来自每个大洲的气候消息。
这位获奖作家回忆起她将其视为最重要的文学导师之一的男人。 一位伟大的导师能给我们信心去展望自己的作品,而此时我们仍能感受到背后那只温柔的手,始终在帮助我们前行。在我的生命中,绝大部分时间里我都感受到温德尔·贝里的文学之手在我的肩胛之间,因此,在他 8 月以 92 岁之高龄去世后,醒来发现这个世界上再也没有他,这令我感到震惊。我现在唯一想读的文字就是他的。首先,《宣言:疯狂农民解放阵线》在今天早晨建议我,去询问那些没有答案的问题。去投资于千禧年。 ... 种植红杉。 …
他在那种认为新事物总是优于旧事物的信念中看到了危险。 这在今天比他五十年前写下这段话时更具紧迫性。如果仍有读者怀疑一个农民能给他们带来多少启示,那是他们的损失。 他的散文、《安息日诗集》(Sabbath Poems)、波特威廉(Port William)系列小说——《汉娜·库尔特》(Hannah Coulter)、《杰伯·克罗》(Jayber Crow)、《老杰克的记忆》(The Memory of Old Jack),这些作品表面上都十分平静,实则是深藏惊艳之美的…
小学时,我和一个富有想象力的伙伴曾试图把课间休息变成一场“卡尔文球”比赛。这项,呃,运动,出自比尔·沃特森那部令人愉悦的漫画《卡尔文与霍布斯》,它只有一条规则:“你不能两次以同样的方式进行比赛。” 也许正是随之而来的那种无政府状态,解释了为什么我在初中时会对《龙与地下城》的规则书如此痴迷。 我青少年时期的阅读口味偏向推想文学,倾向于那些遵循其世界精确规则的书籍。只要被某种逻辑所约束——无论这种逻辑多么古怪或奇妙——天马行空的想象都是极好的。在大量运用世界观构建的小说…
皮克或许是 20 世纪上半叶最具有风格的英国幻想作家——无论是在他的散文、着装还是姿态上。他被提及的次数远低于他应得的关注,不过每当他被提及时,通常是与同时代的 J.R.R. 托尔金和 C.S. 路易斯被一同提及。 这些并非完美的类比。皮克那部未完成的杰作——《戈门加斯特》系列的前两本书,其宏大程度堪比《指环王》或纳尼亚系列小说。但它们不采用宏大的寓言,而是交易一种哥特式的、荒诞主义的阶级讽刺。此外,书中没有魔法。 戈门加斯特是一座大得不可思议、迷宫般且破败的城堡,…
如果你之前读过这本书,请随时打断我:一名年轻女性与一条龙建立了心灵感应,在一家父权体制机构中崭露头角,并与一名强大的龙骑士陷入浪漫情缘。 但这并不是丽贝卡·亚罗斯(Rebecca Yarros)的畅销奇幻小说《第四翼》(Fourth Wing)。如果麦凯弗里今天还活着,她将年满100岁——如果你称她为“浪漫奇幻”(romantasy)作家,她向你喷出的火可能比她和亚罗斯笔下所有的龙加起来还要猛烈。 《龙骑士》开启了极具影响力的《Pern 的龙骑士》系列。尽管其设定类…
---
纽约时报
---
噢,加拿大!在《真北》(True North)一书中,资深旅行作家保罗·塞鲁横跨其祖辈的国家,以洞察该国与其自身之地的不同。作者:詹妮弗·萨莱 / 第 9 页
---
纽约时报
2026年10月4日
---
6 奇幻
评论员:Jennifer Harlan
8 《离场派对》(EXIT PARTY)
作者:艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔
评论员:Lincoln Michel
11 《分手》(THE BREAKUP)
作者:库尔特·安德森
评论员:Jonathan Dee
14 《更新的世界》(THE NEWER WORLD)
作者:塞巴斯蒂安·巴里
评论员:Ian McGuire
---
7 《冈佐神经质》(GONZO NEUROTIC)
杰里·斯塔尔之最佳(及非最佳)作品集
作者:杰里·斯塔尔
《角落男孩》(CORNER BOY)
新旧徘徊
作者:Nik Cohn
评论员:Dwight Garner
9 《真北》(TRUE NORTH)
加拿大公路之旅
作者:保罗·塞鲁
评论员:詹妮弗·萨莱
10 《红杉》(REDWOOD)
冷战时期最非凡间谍的不为人知的故事
作者:本·麦金泰尔
评论员:Joseph Finder
15 《点名》(ROLL THE CALLS)
回忆录
作者:阿里·埃马纽埃尔
评论员:Alexandra Jacobs
16 《挥金如土》(MONEY TO BURN)
关于莱昂·布莱克、阿波罗全球管理以及新华尔街兴起的赤裸真相
作者:William D. Cohan
评论员:Jonathan Mahler
17 《当美国咆哮时》(WHEN AMERICA ROARED)
20世纪80年代如何拯救、随后又摧毁了这个国家——并引导我们走向今天
作者:乔纳森·考夫曼
评论员:Rick Perlstein
---
18 《爸爸》(DAD)
作者:Christian Robinson
《MUÉGANOS》
作者:Jaque Jours
《除了我没人》(NOBODY BUT ME)
作者:Sara Lundberg
评论员:Bruce Handy
---
5 循书而行
Katt Williams
12 随笔
《吸血鬼采访》50周年
作者:克里斯托弗·赖斯
22 评价
温德尔·贝里
作者:芭芭拉·金索尔弗
23 如风般阅读:世界观构建的课程
作者:John Maher
等等。
4 读者来信
19 畅销书榜
19 编辑精选
20 平装书专栏
封面插画:Nada Hayek
让今天的大学生准备成为明天的全球公民。
获取纽约时报的校园范围访问权限。详情请访问 nytimes.com / campuswide
50
小时使用厨师机烘焙
24 批饼干
10 小时手工打发奶油
详情请访问 nytimes.com / hellowirecutter
Wirecutter
一种简单的方法
让你的厨房
变得甜蜜
让准备时间成为新的游戏时间。
烹饪
---
探索食谱集,例如《与孩子一起烹饪的食谱》。
读者来信
读后落泪
致编辑:
关于 Erik Piepenburg 的随笔《DNF(未读完)如何变得被接受》(9月13日):关于一旦开始阅读是否必须读完一本书的问题,塞缪尔·约翰逊持有其典型的强硬观点。“这绝对是一个奇怪的建议,”他宣称,“你也可以决定,无论你偶然结识了哪些人,你都必须与他们共度一生。”但要发现这一点,你需要读到詹姆斯·博斯韦尔的《塞缪尔·约翰逊传》几乎最后的部分——企鹅经典版的第 934 页。我禁不住怀疑博斯韦尔是在拿读者开玩笑。
ADRIAN JOHNS 芝加哥
---
致编辑:
我只想补充一点,如果你真的不喜欢那本书,不要只是把它放在“未读完”的书架上。把它撕掉——要痛快地撕!
朱迪思·杰克逊(JUDITH JACKSON)
佛蒙特州,伊拉斯堡
移山
致编辑:
W.M. Akers 对朱莉·萨默斯(Julie Summers)和约亨·海姆莱布(Jochen Hemmleb)所著《珠峰之谜》(The Everest Mystery,9月 6 日刊)的评论,增加了人们对乔治·马洛里早期尝试登顶珠峰的浓厚兴趣。
读者可能还想了解韦德·戴维斯(Wade Davis)在 2011 年出版的一本广受好评的书——《进入寂静:大战、马洛里与珠峰征服》(Into the Silence: The Great War, Mallory, and the Conquest of Everest)。书中介绍了加拿大测量员奥利弗·惠勒(Oliver Wheeler),他是另一个被忽视的重要人物,他找出了通往北坳(North Col)的路线——这是马洛里登顶珠峰的主要门户——并绘制了第一幅珠峰地图。(惠勒还将照片地形测绘技术引入了喜马拉雅山脉。)
戴维斯探讨了马洛里的英国上层阶级成长背景如何影响他对待惠勒的方式,而惠勒来自一个前英国殖民地。一部令人震撼的纪录片《惠勒的珠峰》(Wheeler’s Everest)基于戴维斯的这本书改编,并邀请了作者以及惠勒的曾孙杰夫(Jeff)参与拍摄。
海瑟·麦坎德鲁(HEATHER MACANDREW)
不列颠哥伦比亚省,维多利亚
离题
德怀特·加纳(Dwight Garner)在评论马龙·詹姆斯(Marlon James)的《消失者》(The Disappearers,9月 13 日刊)时声称,“詹姆斯以一种福克纳很少具备的方式展现出随意的幽默感”。但我经常发现,即使在福克纳最悲剧的小说中,他也具有这种“随意的幽默感”。我最喜欢的片段之一出现在《喧嚣与愤怒》中,当偏执的杰森·康普森被问到在 1927, “杀手阵”(Murderers’ Row)赛季后是否把钱押在洋基队身上时,他说他永远不会押注任何有“鲁斯那家伙”的球队。而那个鲁斯,正是 1927 年击出创纪录 60 支本垒打的人。
理查德·彼得森(RICHARD PETERSON)
伊利诺伊州,马坎达
BOOKS@NYTIMES.COM

---

---
“阅读不是一种爱好。它是我人生中的第一次‘搞钱’(hustle),”这位喜剧演员在他的新回忆录《九条命,没有妻子,以及 69 个妾》(Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines)中写道,书中还解释了他为何与苏斯博士(Dr. Seuss)产生矛盾。
---
按主题。当我寻找特定内容时,我喜欢知道该去哪里找。我一直将书视为资源,而非装饰品。所以书架的布局必须对我来说是有逻辑的。
---
大多数人可能不知道我是一个园丁,或者不知道我真正热爱园艺的程度,所以他们可能会对我拥有这么多园艺书感到惊讶。种植植物这件事能教会你耐心。你必须了解某种植物需要什么,给它合适的环境,然后让它成为它应该成为的样子。我认为这其中包含着一个道理。
---
小时候,有很多东西是我接触不到的,但我可以接触到书。所以如果有什么我想理解的东西,我可以去找一本相关的书。历史、宗教、商业、科学、人物。我可以自学。这就是为什么我称之为我的第一次“搞钱”。所谓“搞钱”(hustle),就是想办法利用你拥有的东西来获得你需要的东西。我拥有的是阅读能力,是继续探索的好奇心,以及足够的意识去理解:知道别人不知道的事情可以成为一种优势。
---
《瑞士鲁滨逊一家》改变了我的生活。那种冒险精神、那种独创性,以及这个家庭必须想办法生存并利用现有资源创造出一个完整世界的设定,非常吸引我。《安妮日记》是另一本。那时我还小,但我意识到我读到的是一个真正经历过这一切的人写下的文字。这让它变得与众不同。
然后是斯蒂芬·金。在某个时刻我不得不承认:金先生,我尊重您的才华,但我也喜欢睡觉。
---
如果你读过七八百本其他人的自传,你会觉得在某个时刻,你也得把自己的名字加入到这场对话中。尽管一亿次观看可能令人惊叹,但那项作品仍然属于互联网。人类拥有互联网的时间不过短短数年,但书籍我们已经拥有数千年了。将你的故事以一种可以摆在书架上、在人与人之间传递的形式呈现,并且在如今流行的任何平台消失很久之后依然存在,这有着截然不同的意义。
---
因为我到处自称“戴帽子的卡特”(Katt in the Hat)并以此赚钱。显然,这会让你收到一份停止并终止函。我当时只是一个试图出名的年轻喜剧演员,没有考虑商标或知识产权。我想的是,“戴帽子的卡特——这很有趣”。而他们的想法则完全不同。
---
没有,我几乎被允许阅读任何我想读的东西。我生命中甚至有一段时间,我唯一想做的就是找到禁书名单,以便把每一本都读一遍。因为如果你告诉我一本书是被禁止的,我现在就得知道为什么。什么样的信息会如此具有波动性,以至于有人决定我不应该接触到它?
---
《妥拉》。全部内容。它提醒了我,我认为你不可能读完一本书而没有任何收获。
---
J.R.R. 托尔金、马克·吐温和杰克·伦敦。邀请托尔金是因为我想了解一个人是如何在脑海中构建一个如此详尽的完整世界,并让其他所有人都相信它真实存在的。邀请马克·吐温是因为他懂得如何利用幽默来揭示社会的真相。邀请杰克·伦敦是因为他的写作和生活都有一种无畏的精神。把他们放在一张桌子上,我不确定我是否会说太多话。我只想看看他们会为了什么而争论。
小型出版社的大机遇
独立出版商以及财力并非完全独立的作者,在每周日的《纽约时报书评》中可享受特殊的广告折扣率。
欲了解更多信息,请联系 Kayla Chowdhury,邮箱:kayla.chowdhury@nytimes.com
以更低的成本触达具有影响力的受众。
纽约时报
书评
---
我们年复一年地将政府告上法庭,以确保政府不能在健康、安全和教育等议题上向纳税人隐瞒信息。
纽约时报
WORDLE, CONNECTIONS, SPELLING BEE, MINIS 等更多游戏!
---
Wordle, Connections,
Spelling Bee, Minis 等更多游戏
纽约时报游戏

由 JOEL FAGLIANO 编辑
200+ 益智谜题与游戏。立即购买《Puzzle Mania》!
在所有书店均有销售。

---

Lex Croucher、Mollyhall Seeley 和 Elizabeth DeLozier 的新书将带您前往神奇的新世界。
阅读《布里亚·琼斯的非魔法生活》(READING THE UNMAGICAL LIFE OF BRIAR JONES,Harper Voyager 出版,447 pp., $32)时——这是 Croucher 的首部成人小说,此前他写过几部迷人的青少年小说——我完全失去了对时间的掌控。我如此地沉浸在书中,如此地投入在作者的想象力中,以至于忘记了吃晚餐。当我终于从中抽离时,我感到精疲力竭,饥肠辘辘,眼眶微红,且完全地兴奋。
小说讲述了布里亚(Briar)和塞巴斯蒂安(Sebastian)的故事,他们是形影不离的童年好友,梦想着能一起就读于神庙奇迹学校(Temple School of Thaumaturgy)——这是一所英国的上流社会机构,传闻其课程包含巫术。当这两个朋友 11岁时,塞巴斯蒂安被神庙学校录取了,但布里亚(非二元性别,使用 they / them 代词)没有,这让布里亚彻底崩溃。
故事开始时,时间已过去七年,布里亚和塞巴斯蒂安此后便再未交谈。随后,布里亚在神庙学校找了一份临时工作。当他们到达那里时,他们对魔法存在的希望实现了——但他们同时也发现,敏感的塞巴斯蒂安已经变成了
詹妮弗·哈兰(JENNIFER HARLAN)是《书评》(Book Review)的编辑及奇幻专栏作家。
一群邪恶高年级学生帮派中最强大的一员。布里亚很快找到了自己的小团体:时髦的书呆子韦斯特比(Westby)、花花公子泰特(Tate)和火辣的哈德利(Hadley),他们在传统的学校里形成了一个对酷儿友好的气泡。布里亚了解到,神庙学校的核心有些东西已经腐烂不堪,而这四个人决心将其拆除。
Croucher 是一位极其机智的作家,擅长无缝地引用流行文化,并且在描写当你和同伴为了生存而奔逃时绽放的情谊方面尤为出色。布里亚的故事——部分是动作冒险,部分是温柔的第二次机会之恋——是对友谊与信任、阶级与权力,以及那些不必定义我们的糟糕选择的动人沉思。这是我今年读过的最喜欢的奇幻小说。我愿意再次为了和这个小团体待在一起而跳过更多顿饭。
Seeley 在她的首部小说《我们诅咒了月亮》(WE HEXED THE MOON,Saga Press 出版,215 pp., 平装本, $18)中,对友谊采取了更具棱角的方式。珍(Jen)、戈尔迪(Goldie)、梅西(Maycie)和哈丁(Harding)是四个最好的朋友,在 2014, 的夏天,他们处于高中毕业年与余生之间的那个临界空间。就像之前许多无聊的青春期女孩一样,她们决定用一个仪式来填补一起度过的最后时光——仪式包括蜡烛、血祭以及来自 Tumblr 的咒语——以此来召唤月亮。
不幸的是,咒语奏效了。月亮从天空中消失,以实体形式出现在珍的卧室里,并拒绝回到那个没人再为她献祭处女的、吃力不讨好的位置。月亮说,女孩们有 10 小时的时间来寻找她的替代者,否则她们所认知的世界将会终结。
这部小说以青春期那种急促的节奏写就——一种由怀旧和奶昔驱动的、炽热的四人狂想(folie à quatre)。事情变得混乱(我指的不只是情节,我确实希望情节能更紧凑一些,尤其是考虑到这本书的篇幅之短)。但,这些友谊有时就是这样:燃烧得不可思议地灿烂,然后像超新星一样燃尽。
“她们永远,永远不会如此真实,”戈尔迪想,“永远不会像在梅西那栋破旧的老房子里,和三个最好的朋友躺在床上时那样充分地活着,那时依然年轻,依然饥渴,依然在‘成为女孩’的祭坛上被剥皮抽筋。”
人们经常谈论奇幻与浪漫之间的共生关系,但我更想推荐另一种令人沉醉的混合体:奇幻推理小说,它将“谁是凶手”类作品中那种惊险反转的快感与一点魔法相结合。在《白教堂满月协会》(THE WHITECHAPEL FULL MOON SOCIETY,Dutton出版,354页,平装本,$20)中,惊险感源自对臭名昭著的开膛手杰克的追捕。而从这个带有狼人色彩的书名中,你大概能猜到超自然元素是如何介入的。
我们的女主角卡罗琳是一个最近失去父母、父亲曾是负债累累的贵族的女儿。在被迫出售家族庄园后,她前往伦敦,希望能找到心爱的哥哥查理,因为查理已经不再回她的信了。
这座城市被烟雾笼罩,近期发生的一系列谋杀案让人们陷入歇斯底里的恐慌。但这里同样具有诱惑力——尤其是对于一个痴迷小说、长期梦想走出庄园看世界的女孩来说。当卡罗琳到达查理居住的寄宿公寓(即书名中的“白教堂满月协会”)时,查理并不在。但房东和房客们——尤其是查理最好的朋友、化学家拉布——在回避她提问的方式上显得十分可疑。于是,卡罗琳给他们提供了一个假姓氏,并应聘成为该屋的女佣,决心挖掘他们的秘密。
卡罗琳并非最干练的侦探,但德洛齐尔(DeLozier)在塑造她和其他白教堂居民时注入了如此温暖的笔触,以至于即使她的笨拙影响了推理进程,我也能原谅她。作者还赋予了开膛手受害者极高的人文关怀,将超自然恐怖与女性(尤其是单身且经济脆弱的女性)所面临的真实恐怖相结合——而这个故事在今天依然在悲剧性地延续。
---
尼克·科恩(Nik Cohn)和杰里·斯塔尔(Jerry Stahl)的两部涵盖职业生涯的随笔集,沉醉于生活的边缘,并捕捉往昔的光环。
作者:德怀特·加纳(DWIGHT GARNER)
“首先,”迈克尔·金斯利(Michael Kinsley)在他的一部专栏集前言中写道,“我不希望有人因为我把一堆旧文章凑在一起就称之为一本书而对我产生不满。”他喜欢这类书籍(我也一样),因为它们是“一种捕捉近期过去之风味的方式”。
两位长期从事自由撰稿的场景塑造者,尼克·科恩和杰里·斯塔尔,即将出版新的作品集。他们在很多方面是截然不同的作家,但将两人的作品放在一起阅读时,共同点便开始大量显现。
《街角男孩》(CORNER BOY)
《新旧徘徊》(Loiterings New and Old)
作者:尼克·科恩
ZE Books 出版。372 pp. $35.
《冈佐神经质》(GONZO NEUROTIC)
《杰里·斯塔尔之最(以及并非最)》(The Best (and Not-So-Best) of Jerry Stahl)
作者:杰里·斯塔尔
ZE Books 出版。444 pp. $24.
两人都不是主流类型(他们的作品与主流环境格格不入),且各自实践着一种可以被称为“意图徘徊”的新闻形式。两人都出生于上世纪中叶(科恩出生于 1946, 斯塔尔出生于 1953)且都曾为大量音乐杂志、替代周刊以及那些现已消失的华丽或底层刊物撰稿。两人都承认在看似事实的报道中掺入了虚构内容。
两人都曾是药物成瘾者,但只有斯塔尔将其变成了职业。他 1995年出版的瘾君子回忆录《永久午夜》(Permanent Midnight)被改编成了由本·斯蒂勒(Ben Stiller)主演的电影。两人都是犹太人。两人写的书都比大多数人意识到的要多。
两人都想在一定程度上撇清自己最受欢迎的作品。就科恩而言,那是 1976 年发表在《纽约》杂志上的一篇关于布鲁克林湾岭(Bay Ridge)迪斯科和俱乐部场景的文章《新周六之夜的部落仪式》(Tribal Rites of a New Saturday Night),该文启发了电影《周末发烧》(Saturday Night Fever)。他后来承认大部分内容是编造的,并且似乎对人们一直以来并不知情感到惊讶。就斯塔尔而言,他通过为 1980 年代后期 NBC 的情景喜剧《ALF》(关于一个毛茸茸的外星人)撰稿而大赚一笔。
两人都对无名且边缘的灵魂感兴趣,并为拳击手、传教士、夜间法庭辩护律师、理发师和热情推销床单的小贩等人物撰写人物特写。两人都谈到自己承受着沉重的冒充者综合征压力。
他们这两部涵盖职业生涯的新作品集——包括随笔、评论、特写、思考片段和随机的胡言乱语——均由特立独行的独立出版社 ZE Books 出版。科恩的作品名为《街角男孩》,斯塔尔的作品名为《冈佐神经质》。
我将从《街角男孩》开始,因——
德怀特·加纳(DWIGHT GARNER)自 2008年起担任《纽约时报》的书评人,在此之前曾在《书评》版担任了十年的编辑。

尼克·科恩
——因为科恩的东西更合我的口味。他在大多数时候给人一种冷静的感觉,而斯塔尔则有一种夸张的、亨特·S·汤普森(Hunter S. Thompson)遇见安东尼·波登(Anthony Bourdain)再遇见科斯莫·克莱默(Cosmo Kramer)(他总是撞上他所写的东西)的噱头,这是一种我在 17 岁时很痴迷的狂躁风格,但现在听起来大多让我感到刺耳。
科恩在二战后伦敦的废墟中长大,他恰好处于一个能感受到埃尔维斯·普雷斯利(Elvis Presley)、披头士(the Beatles)、滚石乐队(the Rolling Stones)和 The Who 乐队在曾经沉闷、灰暗的景观中引发爆炸的地理位置。他是一位先驱性的摇滚评论家,也是《Awopbopalooob Alopbamboom》(1970)的作者,这是一部具有里程碑意义的早期摇滚史。
他的音乐写作热烈、深情且见解独到,且具有攻击性。他大多厌恶鲍勃·迪伦(Bob Dylan)(称其声音像“哀鸣的牙医钻头”)。虽然滚石乐队是他最喜欢的乐队——他将他们描述为粗鲁、刻薄且充满活力的解放者——但他认为他们在 1960 年代后期变得软弱且庸俗。他通过写道 a) 贾格尔会逐渐脱发,以及 b) 该乐队不适合变老,从而激怒了米克·贾格尔(Mick Jagger)。“如果他们有任何体面感,”科恩写道,“他们会在 30 岁生日的三天前死于空难。”
书中包含了菲尔·斯佩克特(Phil Spector)、格蕾丝·琼斯(Grace Jones)以及加里·斯图尔特(Gary Stewart)的人物速写,后者是一位 honky-tonk 叛逆者,由于吉米·麦克多诺(Jimmy McDonough)最近出版的传记,他再次回到了人们的视野。但最终,科恩(Cohn)更感兴趣的是趋势和场景,是街道上正在发生的事情。他写了一本书——《世界之心》(The Heart of the World,1992年)——讲述从电池公园(Battery Park)沿百老汇大街走到时代广场,以及他在途中遇到的人们。
这部选集中最出色的作品可能是一篇关于“泰迪男孩”(Teddy Boys)的文章,这是一个在战后伦敦兴起的、蛮横且不屑一顾的亚文化群体。这些通常被称为“Teds”的人穿着爱德华时期的风格夹克、紧身裤,打着细领带,并将涂了发油的头发梳成庞巴度发型。科恩写道,他们之所以重要,是因为在此之前的英国青少年过于平庸、像羊一样顺从且对长辈恭敬。Teds 为未来所有的青少年反叛提供了蓝图。
科恩深入钻研时尚。事实上,关于“泰迪男孩”的文章改编自他的著作《如今再无绅士:战后英国男装的变迁》(Today There Are No Gentlemen: The Changes in Englishmen's Clothes Since the War,1971年),该书现在极其稀少,仅存的几本售价极高。
科恩多次回到他曾居住过的纽奥良,他能敏锐地捕捉到这座大部分低于海平面的城市如何用其奇异的潮汐牵引人的精神。他描述了 1972 年与皮特·汤普森德(Pete Townshend)一起在法国区散步的情景;汤普森德被那种肯定生命的混乱所震撼,以至于他能做的就是连说一串脏话。
尼克·科恩(Nik Cohn)曾预言米克·贾格尔(Mick Jagger)会脱发,这让后者大为光火。

右侧为杰里·斯塔尔(Jerry Stahl),拍摄于 1997 年,与本·斯蒂勒(Ben Stiller)同行。
科恩当时在纽奥良是一名有抱负的说唱制作人,并为此写了一本很棒的书——《Triksta:纽奥良说唱的生与死》(Triksta: Life and Death and New Orleans Rap,2005年)——本书摘录了其中的部分内容。他对录音室里可能出现的所有差错都持有幽默的态度。摘录中充斥着这样的句子:“我以前见过躺在棺材里的死人,但没见过脸被枪击的。”
科恩对其中一些旧作进行了修订,进行了删减和重写。他将这个过程称为“混音”(remixing)。(斯塔尔也做了同样的事情。)我对这种做法持有两种看法,但很少有作家能抵御修饰旧作并删除愚蠢之处的诱惑。
你可以通过《冈佐神经症》(Gonzo Neurotic)的书名以及作者在前言第一句话中表达的语气来推断斯塔尔这本书的基调:“我宁愿在马背上接受由陷入 Special K 狂乱的伐木工进行的睾丸手术,也不愿坐下来阅读我以前写的东西。”
嗯,那么我们两个想法一样,读者可能会这样回应。事实上,斯塔尔幽默、具有自我意识,并且非常投入于他自己那种“专业前瘾君子”的人设。借用一点高尔夫术语,他的文章可能像尖叫的香蕉一样从球座上飞出。(我不打高尔夫。)但他比他表现出来的要冷静得多。
书中包含关于美国小姐选美大赛的随笔——斯塔尔询问每位参赛者,希望将她们从那些程式化的回答中震出来:“发生在你身上最糟糕的事情是什么?”——以及关于一个天体殖民地的随笔。在冥想室和水疗池之间,他心想:“如果我运气好,说不定能找到盖伊·塔莱塞(Gay Talese)的钱包!”
斯塔尔写到了《肉体咖啡馆》(Café Flesh,1982年)的制作过程,这是一部由他共同编剧的后末日色情电影,后来成为了邪典经典。他为马龙·白兰度(Marlon Brando)、本尼西奥·德尔·托罗(Benicio Del Toro)、眼神狂野的电视主持人汤姆·斯奈德(Tom Snyder)以及休·格兰特(Hugh Grant)的短期女友迪凡·布朗(Divine Brown)撰写人物速写,或者尝试撰写(这本书包含很多迂回写作)。他曾为《双峰》撰稿,并说他因为提交的剧本上沾有血迹和头发而被解雇。书中还有一些关于成为海洛因界的乔伊·切斯纳特(Joey Chestnut)的半可信的故事。
他写到了蜜月套房、宗教电视节目以及在《奥普拉》节目中亮相。有一篇关于毁掉自己肝脏(“我那巨大的粉色器官”)的文章,随后话锋一转,变成了对洛杉矶 Musso & Frank Grill 餐厅肝脏牛排的狂热赞赏,称其“宽度大约相当于一个汽车座椅,长度则像婴儿的前臂”。
斯塔尔是他自己创造的一个生动且具有喜剧色彩的人物。生活像箭一样从他身边疾驰而过,其中一些箭深深地扎在他的腹中。他好奇麦当劳的创新者雷·克罗克是否知道,他的餐厅对于几代瘾君子意味着什么。斯塔尔拥有幸存者的谨慎,并持有长远的视角。他问道——这可能是我偶然读到的最出色的自助类语言——“也许这就是你能接近幸福的极限——不让别人不快乐。”
记者兼摇滚评论家本·拉特利夫(Ben Ratliff)编辑了科恩的《角落男孩》(Corner Boy)。在他的引言中,他写下了一句话,适用于这两位作家:“无论他写什么主题,都是写给那些相信‘最佳选择通常不在菜单上’的人。”
---
在艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔的新小说中,两种版本的美国未来发生了剧烈碰撞。
---
如今,各色美国人都在担心这个国家面临着一个危险的未来。国家是否会陷入内战?还是会堕落为一个反乌托邦的威权国家?在艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔 (Emily St. John Mandel) 雄心勃勃且引人入胜的新小说《离场派对》(Exit Party) 中,答案是:两者皆有可能。
《离场派对》的故事始于 2031 年的洛杉矶,此时“美国在一次政变后分崩离析”,各州相继脱离联邦,且“一个月内便爆发了战争”。但目前,战斗已经结束,加利福尼亚共和国的宵禁已经解除,人们准备尽情狂欢。
最近因企图谋杀罪出狱的阿里·韦克 (Ari Waker) 与她的室友
林肯·米歇尔 (LINCOLN MICHEL) 是小说《金属领域》(Metallic Realms) 和《身体侦察员》(The Body Scout) 的作者。他撰写每周时事通讯《反向工艺》(Counter Craft)。
格洛丽亚 (Gloria) 一起参加在朋友卡里姆 (Kareem) 公寓举办的派对。格洛丽亚秘密地怀了卡里姆的孩子,并且在混乱初期的“一场拥挤的家庭派对”上遭遇的一次忠诚派自杀式爆炸中留下了心理创伤。“每当我想到派对,我就会想到炸弹,”她坦白道。
《离场派对》(EXIT PARTY)
作者:艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔 (Emily St. John Mandel)
Knopf 出版社。301 页。$32.
尽管如此,朋友们还是去了……接着事情变得诡异起来。一些客人的分身出现了,而卡里姆则消失得无影无踪。一幅名为《天鹅跳水》(Swan Dive) 的画作在厨房地板中央凭空出现,但就在阿里凝视时,它消失了,“在眨眼间不复存在”。
这些事件引发了一系列环环相扣的谜团,小说在 300 页的篇幅中,跨越一个世纪的时间,通过庞大的角色阵容对其进行了探讨。要在不破坏其结构之美的前提下概括这部多层次的小说是很困难的,但读者应当知道,《离场派对》发生在两个交织的平行宇宙中,这两个宇宙对美国的未来有着不同的阴暗愿景。“有一个世界,我的祖国破碎成一片混乱,”一个角色解释道,“而另一个世界,我的祖国像拳头一样紧闭。”
在时间线 A 中,阿里进入了崩溃后的零工经济,为争夺前州控制权的民兵组织打零工。叙事随后跳跃到未来,此时年长且富有的阿里定居在“巴黎的精英中心”,那里被一个形状像“一系列巨大肥皂泡”的天气控制穹顶所包裹,保护富人们免受气候变化和流行病的侵害。阿里作为一名专注于“崩溃后形式主义”的艺术收藏家,过着舒适的生活。她的珍藏之作之一便是《天鹅跳水》,那是她从绝望的格洛丽亚手中买来的。然后有一天,塞巴斯蒂安 (Sebastian) 来拜访她,他是格洛丽亚现在处于青少年时期的儿子,他此行是为了偷走那幅神秘的画作。
在时间线 B 中,伊巴里 (Ibari) —— 阿里的分身 —— 过着截然不同的生活。她不是罪犯,而是威权主义美国内部安全局的一名政府间谍。在这个多元宇宙中,其他国家纷纷“崩溃”,而这个国家通过意识到“混乱与秩序的区别在于控制”而幸存下来。在这个未来中,每个邻居都在监视对方,如果你参加“支持民主的示威活动”,你可能会变成一个“幽灵”,不再“有权拥有住房、医疗保健或法律保护”。
塑造令人难忘的角色始终是一项挑战,而曼德尔通过两条时间线将这项任务增加了一倍。即便如此,她依然成功了。随着小说探讨环境如何决定命运,她的角色在两个世界中都具有鲜明的个性。小说还深刻地描绘了在世界对他们而言彻底颠倒后,曾经享有特权的美国人的心理状态。“我只是从未想过成为历史的一部分,”一名派对宾客哀叹道。
更为模糊的是那两个未来的美国。与亚历克斯·加兰的电影《内战》(2024)类似,《离场派对》(Exit Party)即便在描述政治动荡和意识形态斗争时,也避谈政治与意识形态。美国 A 是沿着不明确的断裂线发生的一场无法解释的内战产物。美国 B 则是一个由线人聚集在任何地方都可能存在的官僚办公室里的“监控国家”。两者感觉更像是寓言,而非美国具体历史及其现有的内斗和威权倾向的延伸——在现实中,党派忠诚被大声宣告,而监控是通过科技公司和消费者的共谋来实现的。
尽管如此,《离场派对》在许多方面的表现都非常出色——从紧张的动作场面到切换视角和形式的创新结构——这部小说将理所当然地吸引新读者,同时令曼德尔的现有读者沉迷其中。《离场派对》感觉像是她迄今为止职业生涯的巅峰之作,将作者早期犯罪小说的惊险与神秘,与后来如《第十一站》等小说中宏大的前提和投机性沉思结合在一起。除了与她之前书籍在主题上的联系,还存在字面上的联系:阿里·韦克(Ari Waker)是《歌手之枪》(The Singer’s Gun)中的核心人物,而《天鹅潜水》(Swan Dive)中的画家则出现在《玻璃酒店》(The Glass Hotel)中。
“如果你活得足够久,”格洛丽亚的分身说道,“你就会变成另一个时间线的移民。”我们所熟知的世界总是在消失。《离场派对》提出了一个重要问题:当不仅是个人而且是社会环境发生变化时,人们会变成什么样?每个人都具备谋杀或英雄主义的能力吗?犯罪或共谋?绝望或反叛?正如叙述者在小说接近尾声时尖锐地问道:“在世界末日,你会是谁?”
---
资深旅行作家保罗·塞鲁横跨其祖辈的故土,以洞察该国与他所在国家的不同之处。

By 詹妮弗·萨莱
在唐纳德·特朗普对待加拿大的标志性“成就”中——发动贸易战、威胁吞并、侮辱其人民、仅仅因为他能这样做就破坏一段长久的联盟——这位总统还设法让一本关于加拿大的旅行书变得出奇地及时。
在《真北:加拿大在路上》(True North: On the Road in Canada)中,保罗·塞鲁描述了他在魁北克探索祖先根源的经历,如何演变成一部关于加拿大是什么以及它对居住在那里的人们意味着什么的跨国记录。加拿大人恰巧对美国非常了解;由于人口相对较少,仅有 4100 万,加拿大
真北(TRUE NORTH)
加拿大在路上(On the Road in Canada)
保罗·塞鲁 著
Mariner 出版社,423 pp. \$32.
长期以来出于必要性一直密切关注其庞大的邻居。(我出生在多伦多。)毋庸置疑,反之则不然,尽管美国历史上曾多次尝试吞并加拿大,但最终都无疾而终。“加拿大人是隔壁的陌生人,”塞鲁写道。这个国家“对大多数美国人来说是一片模糊”。
85岁的塞鲁将这本旅行书——他的第 12 本——视为最后一本。“这个星球上到处都是旅行者和游客,就像被撞伤的桃子上的蚂蚁一样,”他以其特有的脾气和活力写道。在之前的书籍中记录了前往巴塔哥尼亚和中国等遥远地方的旅程后,塞鲁说他现在更喜欢在夏威夷和鳕鱼角的家中闲逛,在那里他也可以坐在书桌前写他的(许多部)小说。作为一名自认的旅行者,他长期以来避开游客的舒适感,忍受“破旧巴士站”或“恶臭廉价旅馆”的折磨,以便与当地人交谈。
而他确实与当地人交谈了。《真北》的大部分内容讲述了他在加拿大各地的对话,仅偶尔提到纪念碑或博物馆这样显而易见的事物。他促使加拿大人对他们与美国人之间的差异进行“概括”,并得到了各种答案。有些答案很熟悉,比如加拿大人更尊重权威,更愿意为公共利益工作。另一些则更令人震惊。在安大略省贝尔维尔(塞鲁祖母的出生地),一名女性认为美国人是“一群恐惧的人”,并指出他们拥有如此多的枪支。她问塞鲁美国人在害怕什么。“这很明显,”他说,“他们害怕持有枪支的其他美国人。”
这本书和塞鲁的旅程一样,主要按地理位置组织,尽管
詹妮弗·萨莱是《纽约时报》的非虚构类评论员。
他以亚马斯卡(Yamaska)的一些家族史开始——这是魁北克省的一个微小市镇,300 多年前,一个名叫安托万的塞鲁与妻子和孩子在那里定居。这些加拿大祖先的漫长历史被深情地重建,且往往细节详尽得过分,直到保罗·塞鲁本人跨越边界,书的节奏才加快。
在 2022年初,他前往寒冷的渥太华,因为他听说抗议防疫措施的卡车司机们聚集在加拿大的首都,称之为“自由车队”。一些组织者发布了书面要求,要求更换政府。他在混乱中徘徊,对罕见的加拿大动乱景象感到惊讶。
与塞鲁交谈的非车队加拿大人几乎一致表示震惊。他还注意到,虽然大约 20 percent 的加拿大卡车司机是巴基斯坦人或锡克教徒,但从他看到的抗议者身上看不出来。事实证明,卡车司机抗议活动的捐款近一半来自美国。正如《伦敦书评》在 2022 年 4 月的一篇文章中所述,“美国人直接资助了一个公开目标是推翻邻国民主选举政府的运动。”
三年后,在特朗普开始其第二个任期后不久,塞鲁发现总统的一连串侮辱实际上将原本分歧严重的加拿大群体在爱国主义精神下团结了起来。背叛的刺痛感加剧了他们的愤怒。加拿大人非常看重公平;而那种“你们那儿是个不错国家”式的敲诈被广泛认为令人厌恶——尤其是当这种行径是由最亲密的盟友实施时,其恶劣程度更甚。正如一名多伦多的销售员告诉他的那样:“我们一直是个好朋友和好邻居,在你们所有的战争中我们都并肩作战——结果我们得到了什么?虐待。”
但《True North》并非一个单纯赞美加拿大英勇的单调叙事。塞鲁采访了原住民,他们分享了关于儿童被绑架并被送往该国臭名昭著的寄宿学校的毁灭性故事,其中最后一所学校于 1997 年关闭。他大声质疑,加拿大对待移民的方式——推广多元文化的“马赛克”而非同化式的“熔炉”——是否可能鼓励了一些新移民留在他们未被同化的“族群泡沫”中,而不是认同他们所采取的国家。“似乎没有哪个泡沫居住者会对美国总统将加拿大变成第 51 个州的威胁感到太困扰,”他写道。
话虽如此,那个“似乎”一词承载了极大的含义。《True North》不可避免地是一本印象派书籍,充满了塞鲁的观察和解读。他是个漫游者,将碎片化的内容交织在一起,并……
---
采访片段、新闻报道、历史和文学评论。他钦佩罗伯逊·戴维斯、玛格丽特·艾特伍德和梅维斯·加兰特的作品,尽管爱丽丝·门罗的故事一直让他感到冷漠。“我觉得它们太长且冗赘,”他抱怨道,“它们的景观过于理智、焦虑且局限于室内。”
就塞鲁而言,他通常很有魅力,即使在脾气暴躁时,或者在扮演那个自大的美国人、回忆加拿大人告诉他多么热爱他的作品时也是如此。
《真北》是塞鲁北美公路旅行三部曲的最后一本书,该系列始于《深南》,随后是关于他在墨西哥旅行的《在蛇之原》。在不列颠哥伦比亚省一次格外壮丽的驾驶过程中,他经历了“我所经历过的最接近精神觉醒的体验”。
他已经希望能再次返回。在跨越边境进入美国时,他注意到了和平拱门上的铭文,其崇高的情怀在现在看来像是一件令人心酸的纪念品:“共同之母的孩子们——愿这些大门永不关闭。” □
---
在本新书中,本·麦金泰尔讲述了一名在伊朗的俄罗斯间谍为了一个不同寻常的要求而背叛祖国的故事。
作者:约瑟夫·芬德(JOSEPH FINDER)
英国作家本·麦金泰尔(Ben Macintyre)凭借将尘封的政府档案转化为扣人心弦的非虚构惊悚小说而取得了辉煌的职业生涯。他的《肉馅行动》(Operation Mincemeat)被改编成了电影和舞台剧,而《朋友中的间谍》(A Spy Among Friends)则被拍成了电视剧。在他的最新作品《红杉》(Redwood)中,他再次做到了这一点。故事围绕克格勃少校弗拉基米尔·库齐奇金(Vladimir Kuzichkin)的叛逃展开,他在 1979 年伊朗革命后的混乱时期驻在德黑兰。
《红杉》(REDWOOD)
冷战中最非凡间谍的未讲述故事
作者:本·麦金泰尔
Crown 出版社。393 pp. $32.
他叛逃的原因并非意识形态或金钱,而是性。具体来说,他患有勃起功能障碍。库齐奇金确信原因是“解剖学”上的,即包皮过紧,而割礼可以解决这个问题。由于担心伊朗人或苏联人可能会发现他的缺陷,他坚持要求在西方进行手术。麦金泰尔写道:“库齐奇金是历史上第一个要求将割包皮作为叛逃代价的间谍。”麦金泰尔认为,这一坚持改变了中东的历史。
赌注极其巨大。沙阿的倒台使华盛顿失去了在该地区最亲密的盟友,人质危机切断了与德黑兰的关系,而苏联入侵邻国阿富汗则加剧了人们对克里姆林宫进一步扩张的恐惧。与苏联接壤且正与伊拉克交战的伊朗,显得尤为脆弱。西方情报机构尤其担心伊朗的亲苏共产党——图德党(Tudeh),该党已经渗透进政府和军队。他们不知道的是,这种渗透程度有多深,或者莫斯科打算何时利用它。
在 Oct. 1, 1981, 库齐奇金进入英国驻德黑兰大使馆,自称是一名有“紧急”事项需要讨论的副领事,并告诉英国驻德黑兰高级外交官尼古拉斯·巴灵顿(Nicholas Barrington),他想为英国工作。
军情六处(MI6)给他起了一个代号——“红杉”(REDWOOD)。他身高超过 6 英尺 4 英寸,比他的上线高出一个头;这个加密代号是根据世界上最高的树木选定的(正如麦金泰尔所观察到的,代号应不透露信息的标准规则被全球所有情报机构所忽略)。伦敦方面直到后来才注意到这个词还包含另一个双关含义——
约瑟夫·芬德(JOSEPH FINDER)经常撰写关于俄罗斯的文章,著有 17 部小说,最近的一部是《寡头之女》(The Oligarch's Daughter)。
——RED 代表共产主义,WOOD(木头)代表他无法实现的那个东西。
在八个月的时间里,库齐奇金在苏联大使馆内从事间谍活动,他提供的情报极其惊人。他的情报将图德党描绘成一个由苏联资助的傀儡,由克格勃指挥(且极有可能由其武装)。
麦金泰尔写道,令人震惊的是,军情六处将库齐奇金揭露的一切都交给了阿亚图拉——“每一个图德党领导人,每一个政府内部的线人,每一个军队地下组织的成员,每一个在伊朗的克格勃官员和间谍”——而库齐奇金本人在伊斯兰堡的一次秘密会议上提交了证据。
军情六处还将他们的来源和计划透露给了中央情报局(C.I.A.)局长威廉·凯西(William Casey)。在 1982, 凯西对该行动给予了“全力支持”,认为他由此在“签署伊朗共产党的死刑判决书”,麦金泰尔写道,这意味着将“数千人的生命置于危险之中”。
麦金泰尔解释说,凯西可能不仅向苏联人,而且向他自己的政府隐瞒了中央情报局的参与,这样总统里根就可以真正地声称对一个令人震惊的事实不知情:即美国在公开谴责霍梅尼政权的同时,却在秘密地与其合作。麦金泰尔谨慎地表示:“目前尚不清楚比尔·凯西是否寻求或获得了罗纳德·里根的授权。”
在麦金泰尔的叙述中,这位美国情报首脑是基于一份跨部门备忘录采取行动的,该备忘录警告称苏联可能在 9 到 14 周内占领伊朗,这种情况增加了美国采取核响应的可能性。但并非所有人都陷入恐慌。麦金泰尔本人怀疑莫斯科是否有意入侵。支持此类计划的证据十分匮乏。图德党(Tudeh Party)太弱,无法独立夺权;而且至少在短期内,克里姆林宫也有理由容忍霍梅尼:无论他对共产主义多么敌视,他对美国的敌视程度则更深。
麦金泰尔声称,为了防范一个可能在很大程度上是虚构的危险,有 6,000 到 10,000 名图德党成员被逮捕并关押,数百甚至数千人死亡。图德党的领导人遭到酷刑,被强迫在电视上认罪,在某些情况下被处决或私刑杀害。随后在 1988, 当霍梅尼

K.G.B. 特工弗拉基米尔·库齐奇金(Vladimir Kuzichkin)与妻子加琳娜(Galina)于 1977 在德黑兰的一座植物园内。
---
对那些“与上帝作战”的人发布了法特瓦(宗教禁令),已经服刑完毕的囚犯也被处决。“图德党(Tudeh)的确切死亡人数可能永远无法得知,”麦金泰尔写道,“行刑者并没有计数。”
麦金泰尔的结论是,“REDWOOD 案件既是成功也是失败,是一场以胜利和失败告终的计谋,是一项重大成就,也是一个严重的错误,证明了意外后果的反复无常。”他写道,通过煽动伊斯兰共和国的偏执与残暴,并帮助穆拉(伊斯兰教法学者)巩固权力,美国和英国“在无意中帮助创造了”他们现在所谴责的这个怪物。
麦金泰尔更宏大的观点——即 2026 年的伊朗在 1982 年的世纪屋(Century House)是无法预见的——是不容置疑的,而且他将其与在阿富汗武装穆贾希丁的类比也非常恰当。
但当然,后果是被预见到的,至少在执行该计划的部分人员心中是如此。两名高级官员表示他们将辞职。其中一人预测 REDWOOD 文件中点名的人将面临“惨烈的结局”。英国特工也预料到了这次镇压。他们被告知了这一点,但仍然继续执行。
这并不意味着凯西(Casey)和支持该计划的军情六处(MI6)成员对其成功的前景看得十分透彻。按照冷战逻辑,清除一群共产主义者几乎无关紧要,尤其是如果这样做能防止伊朗成为苏联的卫星国。
麦金泰尔较为大胆的结论之一是,如果 1981 年就有了伟哥,库齐奇金(Kuzichkin)可能就不会叛逃,而且在苏联火力支持下,图德党最终可能会发动一场成功的政变。冷战的结局可能会有所不同,或者演变成一场灾难。
这是一个令人震惊的虚拟假设,且在某种程度上与麦金泰尔自身对苏联威胁的怀疑相矛盾。事实上,图德党并不受欢迎,即使在伊朗破碎的左翼内部也是如此,尤其是在该党参与镇压那些在革命后立即反抗大阿亚图拉的独立世俗左翼和伊斯兰左翼之后。而且,尽管图德党表现出了忠诚,伊斯兰共和国很快就关闭了图德党运作的政治空间。到 20 世纪 80 年代初,该党的报纸被关闭,其官方保护也开始动摇。考虑到该党的孤立状态以及政权日益增强的权力掌控,图德党的接管远非必然。
书的最后几页是最令人悲伤的。库齐奇金以英国公民亚历山大·拉金(Alexander Larkin)的身份重新定居,他酗酒,咒骂杀手,有一次在萨默塞特的一个服务站被发现时全身赤裸。2009 年的一个晚上,他带着一瓶伏特加和电影《莫扎特传》(Amadeus)——一个关于背叛的故事——坐了下来。到了早晨,瓶子空了,库齐奇金也死了。(直到不久前,维基百科仍显示他活着。)麦金泰尔报道称,他在醉酒状态下,为他曾帮助送入坟墓的人们感到悲痛。这位叛逃者的结论比他的历史学家更为严苛。但两人之中,只有他曾在现场。
---
库尔特·安德森的小说将背景设定在 19 年后的未来,讲述了一个在内战导致国家破裂中艰难生存的家庭。

作者:乔纳森·迪 (JONATHAN DEE)
设定在未来的小说并非科幻小说的专属领域;焦虑的时代往往会产生焦虑且带有警示意味的文学反乌托邦,而你记得上一次没感到焦虑是什么时候吗?尤其是 20 世纪,这类愿景层出不穷,其中一些——如《使女的故事》,或出版于 1932 年且日益令人不安的《美丽新世界》——被证明比其他作品更具预言性。不过,将它们理解为对未来的真实押注并不合适,而应将其视为对当下时刻盲目波动之恐惧的梦幻式释放。
《分裂》(THE BREAKUP)
作者:库尔特·安德森 (Kurt Andersen)
随机屋出版社。556 页。$30.
库尔特·安德森在其新小说《分裂》中做了一些极少此类书籍会做的事情(我想到了乔恩·雷蒙德出色的 2022 年气候灾难小说《否认》);他设定的舞台并非某个我们的问题已成为历史的遥远世纪,而仅仅是 19 年后的现在,届时他的大多数读者可能依然在世。
为了推演 2026 年美国生活那令人恐惧的临界状态,他描绘了一个 2045 年的景象——在经历了一场短暂、肮脏且构思相当精妙的第二次美国内战几年后——这个国家分裂成了两个界限模糊但依然官方的实体:美利坚合众国(现在只剩下 39 个州)和自由美国共和国(F.A.R.),后者是一个在很大程度上由白人和基督徒组成、回归某些倒退理想的实体,而我们现在的所有人都对此感到忧郁地熟悉。
随着和平时期的建立,前美国的所有公民都被允许投票决定他们想要加入这两个实体中的哪一个。因此,这一次并没有像梅森-迪克逊线那样在地理和想象上如此整齐的界限;例如,穿行于南部各州的旅行者——那里的城市地区不想成为 F.A.R. 的一部分,正如 F.A.R. 也不想要它们一样——一直在不断地跨越和重新跨越“国家”边界。这不是脱离,而是“分联”:就解决方案而言,这是一团糟,但至少它停止了恐怖主义无人机袭击,以及军队为了在街头杀死反叛的美国公民而部署的机器人响应。目前如此。
引导我们进入这种新美国生活的向导是一个名为津巴利斯特 (Zimbalists) 的家庭,他们深知,自己内部的裂痕正是国家裂痕的缩影。在
乔纳森·迪 (JONATHAN DEE) 是八部小说的作者,最近的一部是《糖街》(Sugar Street),同时也是雪城大学研究生写作项目的主任。
2044 年,这个家庭从田纳西州搬到了旧金山,以便亚舍·津巴利斯特 (Asher Zimbalist) 能代表一个人管理一个定义模糊的“研究所”,而那个人可能是最难以捉摸的物种:利他主义亿万富翁。但亚舍的妻子娜塔莉 (Natalie) 无法忍受这种文化冲击。她竟然是个诗人,尽管她因某种直言不讳的、带有莱昂内尔·施里弗 (Lionel Shriver) 风格的对自由主义虔诚之道的攻击而获得了一些文化上的恶名;六个月前,她搬回了田纳西州。
那么他们是彻底分手了吗?政治是罪魁祸首吗?他们自己也不确定(他们的两个孩子也不确定),而现在,由于计划已久的为小儿子洛根 (Logan) 考察潜在大学的行程迫在眉睫,他们不得不面对现实。这次旅程将带他们穿过重新配置的美国心脏地带。
这是一个很好的设定。令人不解的是,这部小说在津巴利斯特(Zimbalist)一家的汽车引擎启动——以及小说的情节随之运转,并开启那段备受推崇的公路旅行——之前,竟然过去了 300 多页。在此之前,是一段漫长且戏剧性地停滞在原地的内容,也就是投机小说圈经常称之为“世界构建”的部分——这是安德森对未来 19 年美国历史愿景的一次完整、富有想象力且细节详尽的描绘。阅读这段内容很有趣,尤其是因为它涉及了许多当代名人的想象结局。(在数十次此类客串中,透露一个剧透应该无妨:埃隆·马斯克在前往火星的途中死于药物过量。)
作为一名小说家,安德森——其非虚构作品包括《幻想之地:美国如何陷入疯狂》(Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire)和《邪恶天才:美国的解体》(Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America)——与其说是情节创作者,不如说更像一名哲学家。当津巴利斯特一家的家庭剧(关于他们是否会和好)终于驶出车道时,其悬念感并不强;这非常像是在车里与三个对着一系列内部笑话大笑的人共度一周,然后他们向你解释为什么那些笑话很有趣。
---
但那又怎样?美国小说中早已充斥着家庭剧。在当前这个看似极化、愤怒不可持续,且美国公民机构与理想被肆意践踏的时刻,《分手》(The Breakup)的读者所追求的,是一个关于我们近期未来的愿景——它是暴力的、告诫性的、带有宣泄感的恐怖,但不知为何依然能够生存下去。就这一点而言,安德森提供了让他之前的作品成为畅销书的某种多巴胺快感。在他的 2045 年,依然有萨莉·鲁尼的新小说(一本标题非常有趣的小说),政府甚至向那些雇佣人类而非仅仅让 AI 担任文字编辑的图书出版商提供税收抵免。这种情况能有多反乌托邦? □
---
在 20 世纪 80 年代初,我母亲的一小群读者在参加她的一次签书会时穿着戏服。这是第一次发生这种情况。那次活动是在旧金山一家灯光温暖的小书店里举行的安静聚会。窗外,周围由宏伟市政建筑组成的混凝土景观,似乎与郁郁葱葱、橡树遍地的新奥尔良相隔万里——新奥尔良是安妮在当时已出版的几部小说中将其塑造为一个活生生的角色的故乡,而她的名字后来也与这座城市不可分割地联系在一起。
那天晚上人们随兴庆祝的书是一本厚如门挡的巨著,封面上印着印象派风格的天使。书名叫做《向苍天哭泣》(Cry to Heaven),探讨了 18 世纪意大利阉伶歌剧演员的生活。现场供应葡萄酒和奶酪。签书台前没有排队的人群。一些艺术家朋友和我父亲在旧金山州立大学的同事们陆续光顾——这与几年后出现的那些光彩夺目的七小时马拉松式签书会完全不同,在后者的活动中,精疲力竭的经理们为了容纳那些渴望为最新的《吸血鬼编年史》签名而排成长龙的、佩戴珠宝的哥特信徒,不得不让巨大的门店在关门时间之后仍保持营业。
毫无预兆地,三位穿着 18 世纪马甲、粗马尾用丝带扎起的英俊年轻人走了进来。我还小,但我认出了他们的服装。他们是我母亲文学处女作中的角色,那本书在我出生前不久出版。那是一本书,像个讨厌的幽灵一样纠缠着我们的生活——一部被评论界唾弃的失败之作,名为《吸血鬼采访》。
如果这个描述显得过于刻薄,请放心,这是我母亲对自己作品最初反响的评价,她在几十年后在 Facebook 上分享过这段看法。那天晚上,当她与英俊的仰慕者们合影时,书店内的气氛变得异常热烈。安妮脸红了。她的笑声带有一种炽热且毫无防备的特质。一群日益壮大的粉丝群体中首批自豪的“足兵”,就这样行进了这个格调高雅的文学派对之中,而此前,大多数客人被吸引前来主要是因为我父亲作为当地知名诗人的名气。
在那之前,安妮·赖斯被视为一名撰写情欲历史小说的、不完全属于流行类别的先锋作家;在她大胆地用严肃且深入的文学思考来书写一个吸血鬼对其漫长永生生活的叙述后,遭到了评论家的全面蔑视。著名的历史小说家詹姆斯·米切纳(James Michener)赞扬了其胆识,但最初的赞誉寥寥无几。在那个年代,将一部小说与漫画书相类比,在大多数读者心中就足以抹杀其文学价值,而《纽约时报》对我母亲的第一部小说正是如此。大多数未售出的副本在仓库中被销毁成纸浆,我母亲直到生命尽头仍会痛苦地回忆起那一刻。如今,那些称《吸血鬼采访》为“瞬间畅销书”的人,是在延续一个与小说本身一样持久的虚构故事。
但书籍走向成功的路径可能是曲折且不可预测的。在出版之初令人失望的几年后,一群边缘化的读者逐渐发现了《吸血鬼采访》。到 1982 年,他们的集体热情不仅在传播,而且强大到足以激发角色扮演(cosplay)。那个雾气弥漫的旧金山之夜,是我们所有人第一次清晰地意识到,我母亲的处女作正从一部失败之作转变为一部邪典经典。那些穿着戏服的男人就是证明——他们是路易(Louis)和莱斯特(Lestat)的优雅漫画版,穿着丝绸服装,从阴冷灰暗的夜晚步入室内。
几天后,我的家人聚集在我们在卡斯特罗区(Castro District)那栋爱德华时代风格住宅的厨房餐桌旁,带着兴奋的惊叹研究着我母亲及其仰慕者的照片。是的,那些男人确实引人注目。但这些照片让人感到灼热的原因则另有所在。它们证明了安妮(Anne)那部曾被冷落的处女作正在获得第二次生命,尤其是在那些被剥夺权利的人和局外人之中——比如酷儿(queer),尽管在那个年代,这个词在很大程度上仍是一个侮辱性词汇。
直到最近,我才想起《吸血鬼采访》(Interview)中的另一个角色是如何在那个夜晚从浓雾中走出来的,只不过是以一种更微妙、更间接的方式。
一位值得信赖的姨妈在那天晚上担任我的保姆。她领着我穿过商店,向我介绍我父母的老朋友们——那些在我出生前就经常参加他们在伯克利山(Berkeley Hills)举办的喧闹派对的诗人、教授、雕塑家和画家。我们来到一位以快嘴和嗜酒著称的朋友面前。他瞪大眼睛,咧嘴一笑,捏了捏我胖乎乎的脸颊。“他长得像小老鼠(Mouse)!”他喊道。
突然间,姨妈推着我穿过成年人的森林,而他则在我们身后重复着那个奇怪的词。

我长得像只老鼠?姨妈解释说,没必要为此感到难过。就像我父母的许多朋友一样,这家伙是个古怪的人。那一刻过去了。
几年后,这件事清晰地回到了我的记忆中。
有一天,在我那所极其前卫的小学里,我和同学们正在学习如何制作家族树。在一名孩子开玩笑说如何把去世的亲人加进去后,老师责备他缺乏同情心。“毕竟,”她说,“克里斯托弗(Christopher)有一个去世的姐姐。”
“我绝对没有,”我回答道,语气带着一个由两位自由派作家在成年人的餐桌旁抚养长大的早熟男孩特有的刻板严肃。我坚持重复这句话,让我的同学们陷入了歇斯底里的狂笑之中。“我绝对没有。”
我并不生气。我的老师很困惑,仅此而已。但她表情中渐渐流露出的沉重告诉我,我错了。在那一瞬间,我的整个世界改变了。
事实证明,“小老鼠”是我父母给米歇尔(Michele)起的昵称,那是他们在我就出生前不久失去的女儿。尽管我永远无法亲耳听到她的声音,但我现在依然在努力地将她称为我的姐姐。她那双巨大的棕色眼睛为她赢得了这个昵称。在她来到世上的前四年里,她是一个光彩照人、像洋娃娃一样的小女孩。然后有一天下午,她走进厨房说:“妈妈,我太累了,不想玩了,”这让我母亲低头看着她,心中充满了深层的恐惧。哪个4岁孩子会累到不想玩耍?
米歇尔与白血病的惨败,将我的父母推入了那段催生出《吸血鬼采访》的阴暗传奇之中。因此,在某种程度上,克劳迪娅(Claudia)——那个被冻结在青春年华、构成了小说中心悲剧三人组的儿童吸血鬼——也出现在旧金山的那场签售会上,即便她没有穿着戏服。
为什么他们对我隐瞒这个秘密?简单来说,他们因为一种血液疾病失去了一个孩子,而又得到了另一个被焦虑困扰的孩子。他们不想将自己所承受的悲剧释放给一个已经能歇斯底里地想象自己的床周围环绕着鲨鱼的儿子。但一旦我知道了,他们的反应是令人惊讶的慷慨与坦诚。他们隐藏的过去之门全部敞开了。
挂在我父亲家庭办公室墙上的那些粗糙画作?它们并不是前邻居孩子的作品,尽管他曾经这样告诉我。关于米歇尔的每一个问题,都得到了坦率且毫无保留的真实回答。她的声音听起来像什么,她喜欢吃什么。(我不知道一个教授和一个挣扎中的作家的孩子是怎么尝到蜗牛肉的,但那是其中之一

---
她最喜欢的东西)。在我寻求信息的过程中,唯一的障碍是我自己犹豫是否愿意听到母亲声音中传出的悲恸颤抖,或看到父亲眼中泛起的泪光。
多年来,我继续对我父母进行这场关于他们生命中决定性悲剧的断断续续的采访,而多年来,我的父母以温柔和诚实地回答了每一个问题。如果说这次采访有一个高潮,那么它发生在采访开始近十年后,当时我们三人坐在一间新奥尔良餐厅外的桌旁。母亲的成功让我们在 1988 年搬到了那里,那时我 10 岁。三年后,我终于鼓起勇气问了那个从一开始就困扰我的问题:“她去世的那天发生了什么?”
到那时,我们已经回顾了他们旅程中的许多其他部分。我知道顶尖癌症中心发来的信件中说我姐姐的情况没有希望。我知道在医生的建议下,父母从未告诉米歇尔确切的诊断结果或预后,只是不断地、温柔地重复她生病了,需要照顾。我甚至知道在她去世前一晚,她病床旁的一个血袋破裂了,以及当父亲承诺会清理干净时,她对他说的最后一句话:“为了我,你的宝贝,”她轻声说道。
但我不知道那个可怕的最后一天。
于是他们告诉了我。他们告诉我,当她的心跳降至一定频率以下时,警报响了。他们告诉我,医生在精疲力竭地进行心肺复苏后,悲伤地说:“我们是在自欺欺人。”他们告诉我,父亲在她的唇上轻轻地吻别,却被那迎面而来的、毫无生气的柔软触感惊到了。然后,在新奥尔良一条绿荫掩映、阳光普照的大道旁的桌边,我们三个人一起哭了。我们为“小鼠”而哭。但在很大程度上,我也在为我的父母而哭。
当时我并不知情,但我也能在他们的作品中找到我寻找的答案。成年后我发现,父亲将我姐姐最后一夜每一个可怕的瞬间,都凝固在了一首名为《Incanto》的灼人诗篇中。
安妮穿着蓝色长袍,两年后,依然,
在最后一刻,
惊愕。
母亲的作品则不那么直白。回忆录并非安妮的热情所在。她将回忆录作为她笔下永生者的虚构叙事形式,但她以超越她所谓的“经验中的平庸细节”而自豪。在我成为一名出版作家后,她有时会以一种无意中显得傲慢的方式赞赏我作品中的这些方面。“我永远写不出一本关于上高中的书,”她曾带着自豪的微笑告诉我。我至今仍不确定,她是更高兴于我确实这么做了,还是更满意于她自己坚决地拒绝这样做。
如果说《吸血鬼采访》中带有我姐姐患病时的任何痕迹——那些噩梦般的住院经历、残酷的治疗和财务上的毁灭(到最后我的父母穷困潦倒,米歇尔被埋葬时没有墓碑)——那么这些痕迹已被隐喻转化为既华丽又血腥的元素。
除了一个。
对于任何在了解安妮传记的情况下阅读此书的人来说,米歇尔就是儿童吸血鬼克劳迪娅的原型,这一点似乎显而易见。但这个暗示在很多年里都让我的母亲感到被冒犯。
最终,她终于豁然开朗。视角让她看到了他人所暗示的内容:一个永远无法在生理上长大的金发美少女,以及一个被困在令人沮丧的儿童身体中,却在经历永恒的、成熟的永生心理。如果这些并非刻意地成为米歇尔本身的隐喻,那么它们至少是由一位母亲的悲痛所塑造,由她渴望让女儿在没有成熟身体承载的情况下依然能生存并成长的欲望所驱动。
同样显而易见的是,我母亲的丧子之痛,开启了她笔下主角对世界数百年视角的广阔延伸:他那令人崩溃的愧疚,他对死亡的愤怒,以及他对定义尘世生存的掠夺性循环有时感到瘫痪般的绝望。路易·德·庞特·杜·拉克在被吸血鬼咬伤并转化为吸血鬼后,在必须夺取生命才能生存的诅咒中,与关于人类生存状况的深刻问题作斗争。安妮在眼睁睁看着生命中最珍贵、最脆弱的存在在她的无能为力中消逝时,同样面对着愤怒、痛苦和怀疑——正如我父亲所写,她是“震惊”的。
2021年,我的母亲因中风并发症去世,享年80岁。那时,她已经出版了37部小说,她的成功使她成为了家喻户晓的人物。管理她遗产的荣幸落在了我和她的挚友埃里克·肖·奎恩(Eric Shaw Quinn)身上,通过我们的制作公司 Dinner Partners 来执行,这家公司是安妮帮助我们创立的。(她是我们第一期播客节目的首位嘉宾。)新冠疫情没有夺走安妮,但疫情限制使我们无法举行大规模的公开追思会。尽管如此,她热情的粉丝们希望有一种集体哀悼的方式。在接下来的四年里,埃里克和我孜孜不倦地筹备了一场庆典,将戏剧与原创纪录片选集相结合,以讲述她的故事。
但安妮的故事究竟是什么?
有一些显而易见的线索,无数记者此前都曾追踪过。比如,她通过从吸血鬼的视角写作,改变了吸血鬼小说;比如,她描绘了两个男人在要求对其真实身份保密的阴暗且敌对的世界中尝试共同抚养孩子的场景,这是对酷儿身份的一次开创性呈现;比如,1994年由安妮撰写剧本的电影改编版《吸血鬼采访》至今仍是一部恐怖片经典,它是那个 bygone 时代的时光胶囊——在那个时代,奢华的制片厂电影探讨阴暗且复杂的主题,并因此在票房上获得回报。
这些内容我们肯定会包含在内。但这些真的就是安妮本人的故事吗?当然,我们知道米歇尔的去世将是阴郁的核心。但安妮的粉丝们计划前往新奥尔良并填满奥菲움剧院,并不是因为她失去了一个女儿。而是她对这次丧亲之痛的回应,才会吸引他们从世界各地赶来。在活动开始前几天,当我苦于为计划中的演讲寻找一个中心论点时,是埃里克以简单的清晰度提供了一个答案:“你的母亲将发生在她身上最糟糕的事情,变成了发生在她身上最好的事情。”
就是这样。安妮生命的主旋律不仅在于她最大的损失,而在于她如何忍受它。
如果说《吸血鬼编年史》随后的系列小说讲述的是安妮如何从可怕的丧亲之痛中幸存,那么《吸血鬼采访》则给了我们一个捕捉到她所经历之事的精神和心理基础的故事。在我姐姐去世的剧痛中,她编织了一个关于爱与愤怒、家庭、血缘与野蛮之美的世界,让我们所有人穿着从飘逸丝绸到赤裸奔放的各种服装舞至深夜,这是极少数人在一生中才能实现的成就。□
---
塞巴斯蒂安·巴里的这部小说巡礼了内战后的美国,在那里,残酷无处不在,但爱依然坚韧。

作者:伊恩·麦奎尔
爱尔兰作家塞巴斯蒂安·巴里的最新小说《The Newer World》延续了他早先的两部作品——《Days Without End》(2016)和《A Thousand Moons》(2020)。主角泰尼森·布格罗(Tennyson Bouguereau)是一名于 1840, 左右出生在田纳西州奴隶制下的黑人,他在前两本书中都是次要角色,而新小说前四分之一的大部分内容都在快速概括此前讲述过的事件。
对于那些已经熟悉其他卷次的读者来说,这些回顾将很有用,但对于新读者而言,这种必要的简洁可能会令人困惑。因此,尽管《The Newer World》作为一部独立小说当然是可以理解的,但将其作为三部曲的第三部分来阅读和欣赏可能是最好的方式。
巴里将他的故事分为三个大致相等的章节。第一部分迅速地讲述了泰尼森的童年,并且,
THE NEWER WORLD
作者:塞巴斯蒂安·巴里
Viking 出版社,259 pp. $28.
在他和妹妹罗莎莉(Rosalee)获得自由后,以内战后同情邦联者实际上重新控制田纳西州西部的时期结束。
在第二部分中,泰尼森因担心生命安全逃往纳什维尔,在那里进入了一所新成立的自由黑人学校。由于音乐天赋被认可,他加入了合唱团,并与一名同样是歌手的乔治(George)建立了深厚的友谊。他还爱上了一个名叫明妮(Minnie)的女人,她倔强且美丽,但并非完全值得信任。巴里在描写黑人音乐激发情感和引发共鸣的力量方面表现卓越,合唱团在种族主义观众面前表演的场景是小说中最强有力的部分。
在最后一部分中,出现了一个突然且有些令人不安的转变:乔治和泰尼森都离开了学校,加入了军队,然后——直接呼应了《Days Without End》中描述的事件——被派往西部与阿帕契人作战。
《The Newer World》、《A Thousand Moons》和《Days Without End》都设定在内战前、内战期间及内战后的南部和西部各州。除了有许多共同的角色和场景外,它们在主题上通过关注在这个国家历史的非凡时期中,黑人和美洲原住民所遭受的极端偏见、仇恨和暴力而联系在一起。在描述
伊恩·麦奎尔的最新小说是《White River Crossing》。
种族暴力行为时,巴里很少有所保留,这部三部曲的大部分力量来自于他讲述那些极度残酷行为时所采用的冷峻抒情风格。
《Days Without End》包含了对军队针对尤罗克人和苏族人进行种族灭绝行为的冗长且令人心碎的描述,而《A Thousand Moons》的情节则围绕着拉科塔女孩威诺娜·科尔(Winona Cole)遭受的暴力强奸展开。在《The Newer World》中,泰尼森的父母都被白人奴隶主谋杀,他及其妹妹也遭受了残酷的袭击。
但在这三部小说中,暴力虽然重要,却从未是故事的全部。同样核心且持久的是爱。在《Days Without End》的核心是叙述者托马斯·麦克纳尔蒂(Thomas McNulty)——一名能言善道、喜欢女装的爱尔兰移民——与他的四分之一印第安血统情人约翰·科尔(John Cole)之间的酷儿浪漫情缘。在《A Thousand
---
在《月亮》("Moons")中,年轻的温诺娜在同为孤儿的佩格怀中找到了慰藉。
在这两部小说中,巴里明确地表明,一种深层的家庭之爱(无论这种家庭形式多么非传统)可以抵消政治和社会上的残酷,使那些遭受过巨大创伤的人也能忍受生活。这种令人毛骨悚然的暴力与略显泛滥的情感之间不寻常的结合,赋予了这两部早期小说不可否认的原创性和魅力。
《新世界》("The Newer World")有时似乎准备重复其前作所建立的这种慰藉模式,尤其是在其相当古怪的第三部分中,但它未能令人满意地做到这一点。托马斯和温诺娜对爱人热情、全心全意且绝对忠诚,而泰尼森在与乔治和米妮错综复杂的关系中则犹豫不决且不确定。他似乎无法理解自己的欲望,并且经常无法解释自己已经做出或未能做出的决定。
如果我们觉得巴里充分理解并能够向读者传达其主角困惑和自我怀疑的原因,那么这不会成为一个问题,但在这里情况似乎并非如此。相反,这种困惑感觉是泛化的且未得到解决,这使得这部小说虽然力求在心理和情感上比前作更复杂,但最终感觉在稳健性和连贯性上明显逊色。
---
对于阿里·埃马纽埃尔来说,争吵、世仇和侮辱不过是日常工作的一部分,他在一部新回忆录中对其职业生涯进行了毫无掩饰的回顾。
作者:亚历山德拉·雅各布斯 (ALEXANDRA JACOBS)
忘掉《奥德赛》吧。在他那节奏短促、充满脏话且带有报复色彩的新书《Roll the Calls》中,阿里·埃马纽埃尔引用了荷马的前作《伊利亚特》,其首个词就是“愤怒”。而“忘掉”并不是他会使用的那个以 F 开头的脏词。
埃马纽埃尔是一位好莱坞超级经纪人——这个词现在被人工智能(A.I.)所挪用,而 A.I. 这一即将摧毁行业的威胁在本书中几乎没有被提及。宝贝,现在全都是 A.R.I. 的天下。
他代理过那些名气大到只需要一个名字的人,比如奥普拉,以及之前被称为“唐纳德”的那个人;而在 21 世纪初 HBO 的剧集《随从》(Entourage)播出后,他自己也变得出名且只需一个名字,剧中由杰里米·皮文饰演的阿里·戈德是一个极具戏剧张力且口无遮拦的角色。
他也是三个事业有成的埃马纽埃尔兄弟中最小的一个(齐克是医生,拉姆是政治家);阿里在书中主张,他在出生顺序中的位置以及在学校相对的挣扎,正是激励他成为最富有的人的原因。
“第三轨,”埃马纽埃尔告诉一位绰号为“冷静博士”的治疗师,解释被当作傻瓜对待是如何触发他那臭名昭著的脾气的。“这是我唯一能描述的方式。就像一股电荷穿过我的身体。滋!我完全失去了控制。”
近年来,像斯科特·鲁丁和威尔·史密斯这样的演艺圈大佬在经历了自己的“滋!”时刻后陷入低谷:职业生涯被暂停,并被迫为自己的行为道歉。
愤怒在形象上存在问题。但请让位吧,正念;告别吧,斯多葛主义:《Roll the Calls》试图将愤怒重新定义为一种潜在的提升力量,就像戈登·盖柯在《华尔街》中将贪婪定义为好事一样。
“愤怒可能无法解决每一个问题(或者任何问题),但它确实能让问题变得清晰,”埃马纽埃尔写道,或者说是口述道(在他的致谢名单中出现了 J.R. 莫林格,这位 A 级代笔作家曾与哈里王子合作)。“愤怒会让事情达到顶点。”
我的编辑禁止我再使用任何俏皮的合成词,就像埃马纽埃尔曾被禁止进入迪士尼工作室一样,但我打算效仿阿里,无论如何继续冲锋。这可能是世界上第一部“愤怒回忆录”(mad-moir),或者……“愤怒宣言”(mad-ifesto)。
这是一个患有阅读障碍和多动症(A.D.H.D.)的孩子如何崛起的的故事:从为极具文学气息的罗比·兰茨(其客户包括詹姆斯·鲍德温和卡森·麦卡勒斯)舔信封开始;到进入 CAA 的邮件室并一路晋升;到共同创立新兴机构 Endeavor;再到吞并威廉·莫里斯(William Morris)和 IMG。值得注意的是,他这碗巨大的“字母汤”在 TKO Group Holdings 的名下,现在还包括格斗巨头 U.F.C. 和 WWE。
亚历山德拉·雅各布斯是《纽约时报》的书评人,偶尔撰写特写文章。她于 2010 年加入《纽约时报》。
阿里在高中时是一名摔跤手,童年时曾与兄弟们搏斗(他称其为“两个暴力精神病患者”——这是少数几个听起来像玩笑的侮辱之词),他现在借此机会在文字中将对手钉在垫子上。
关于巴里·迪勒,在一次关于 Live Nation 的会议后:“这家伙就是老古董和糟糕想法的混合体。”而且进一步评价道:“无——聊。”
“那个虚伪的奉承者”和“那个 [哔] 蠢货”是对杰弗里·卡岑伯格的客气评价。
《ROLL THE CALLS》
作者:阿里·埃马纽埃尔 (Ari Emanuel)
Knopf 出版社。432 pp. $35.
而对于欧文·阿佐夫,在阿佐夫试图挖走一名客户后:“你本质上是个谎言之徒且自私……你可以欺骗别人并认为自己能逃脱。但在我这里行不通。我不是这个圈子里的人。我的根在别处,让我告诉你一件事:我不忘记,也不会忘记。我会记恨一辈子。”
而这仅仅是一次“侧翼冲突”!
埃马纽埃尔的根在芝加哥的中产阶级家庭,也在耶路撒冷——他的父亲本杰明后来成为一名儿科医生,出生于祖辈逃离乌克兰大屠杀之后。为了纪念被流弹杀死的哥哥埃马纽埃尔,家族姓氏由 Auerbach 改为现在的姓氏。阿里记得自己 7 岁时,在西岸的一次监狱袭击中尿了裤子。
他当时在参观监狱,因为他的母亲玛莎与当地警察局长是朋友。她是一位民权活动家,性格强悍——阿里在听说画家杰克逊·波洛克的母亲“情绪不稳定”且“吝于表达”时,感到了一种亲近感。她把阿里糟糕的成绩单和那些成绩更好的兄弟们的成绩单一起贴在冰箱上。“她不像其他母亲,”他写道,“她经常咒骂。”
埃马纽埃尔有一个患有残疾的养妹肖莎娜,但这本书主要是一场“众神之战”,我们几乎无法从中了解到关于她的信息,或者他与女性的关系。这些关系包括与莎拉·哈德威克·艾丁顿的长久第一段婚姻,两人育有三个儿子和一个女儿;以及与年轻得多的设计师莎拉·斯陶丁格的第二段婚姻,他称呼后者为其服装品牌的名称——Staud。
“你解雇了我,阿里,让我用一种你能理解的方式来说,”当阿里在令人难以置信地让“冷静博士”打电话给她要求复职后,斯陶告诉他,“如果我允许你重新雇佣我,我要升职。还要股权。否则我就辞职。”
埃马纽埃尔是个爱说话的人,而不是阅读者;在一次小组讨论中,当拉姆开玩笑说阿里读不进任何超过 200 页的东西时,他向拉姆竖起了中指。《Roll the Calls》超过 400 页,但得益于莫林格的写作,读起来很快,仿佛是对着语音备忘录应用大声吼出并由一名颤抖的助手转录而成的。iPhone 仅仅加速了埃马纽埃尔的这种势头。“我会像用 2x4 木方一样用我的远程计算机(teleputer)对付你,”他断言,这个词是由乔治·吉尔德在《电视之后的生活》(1990)中预见性地创造的。
噢,怀念 1990 年,那时仅仅在 Spago 餐厅点一份菜单外的菜肴就足以炫耀一番!
传奇经纪人萨姆·科恩吞噬纸张,天知道为什么。我们了解到,比尔·布洛克吃生大蒜是为了提高睾酮水平。而阿里·埃马纽埃尔?他每天摄入一杯活虫以解决他(毫无讽刺意味地)称之为“炎症”的问题,并向一个老对手迈克·奥维茨——他们现在都变得温和了——建议他也这么做。
但如今的好莱坞比起戈尔标志性的口头禅“拥抱和解(hugging it out)”,更关心的是 Hugging Face。在这个城市里,我们以后还能一起吃午餐吗? □

时尚设计师莎拉·斯陶丁格与人才经纪人阿里·埃马纽埃尔,2025年。
---
一名记者记录了华尔街亿万富翁莱昂·布莱克的兴衰,他曾向杰弗里·爱泼斯坦提供数百万美元。
作者:乔纳森·马勒 (JONATHAN MAHLER)

莱昂·布莱克 2024 年在现代艺术博物馆。
金融家莱昂·布莱克或许有资格在杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的帮凶“恶棍画廊”中占据一面独立的墙。在 2012 年至 2017年之间,布莱克向爱泼斯坦提供了惊人的 $1.58 亿美元——如果你把爱泼斯坦在 2019年于狱中自缢身亡时尚未偿还的一笔巨额贷款计算在内,这个数字将超过 $1.7 亿美元。这些款项的披露不仅提前结束了布莱克的华尔街生涯,还确保了他不会被人们记住为那个时代最伟大的交易撮合者之一,而是被视为爱泼斯坦最慷慨的客户。
在《挥金如土》(Money to Burn)一书中,记者威廉·D·科恩(William D. Cohen)详细讲述了布莱克的兴衰。科恩本人曾是一名投资银行家,他的工作极其彻底,《挥金如土》是一次报道上的重大胜利,基于对布莱克、其商业伙伴以及许多其他人的广泛采访,而这些人的话语在书中被大量引用,有时篇幅之长令人心累。
科恩实际上在讲述两个故事。一个是关于布莱克的。另一个关于他创建的私募股权公司——阿波罗全球管理 (Apollo Global Management)。该公司一直处于华尔街持续转型中心:从一个由相对稳健的银行和经纪公司主导的地方,转变为一个由自行筹集和出借资金的“替代资产管理人”统治的更阴暗的领域。
布莱克的经历几乎成了金钱腐蚀影响的一个完美寓言。他的父亲埃利(Eli)原本在长岛过着一名拉比的生活,但在 20 世纪 40 年代中期发生了转变。他认为,只要由“有德之人”掌权,金融业的成就可以与讲坛上的成就一样丰厚,而他在得出这个结论时显然没有意识到其中的讽刺。
埃利·布莱克取得了巨大的成功,他是一家名为联合品牌公司(United Brands Company)的国际企业集团的架构师兼首席执行官。但他的生命以悲剧收场:1975年初,在公司面临日益严重的财务问题和贿赂丑闻之际,他从曼哈顿泛美大厦 44 层办公室的窗户跳了下去。
这一切最终都没有阻止莱昂进入金融界。凭借两枚常春藤联盟学位(达特茅斯学院、哈佛商学院),他于 1977 年在德雷克塞尔-伯纳姆-兰伯特公司(Drexel Burnham Lambert)开始其职业生涯,那是一家垃圾债券巨头,而那里显然极度缺乏“有德之人”。
1990年,在经历了一场针对非法交易的长期联邦调查后,德雷克塞尔被迫破产,布莱克随后创立了阿波罗。他和他的新团队筹集了数亿美元作为启动资金。他们的计划是利用
乔纳森·马勒 (JONATHAN MAHLER) 是《纽约时报》杂志的特约撰稿人,其最新著作是《纽约之神:利己主义者、理想主义者、机会主义者与现代城市的诞生:1986-1990》。
---
《关于莱昂·布莱克、阿波罗全球管理以及新华尔街崛起的赤裸真相》,作者:威廉·D·科汉 (William D. Cohan)
Portfolio出版社。667页。$40。
利用这笔资金来控制陷入困境的公司,然后随心所欲地处置它们。
正如科汉所阐明的,从挣扎中的企业中榨取利润是一项艰巨的工作,通常涉及违背逻辑的金融工程手段和自我交易。毋庸置疑,布莱克及其合伙人在这些风险投资中的获益远高于他们所收购实体的员工或客户。在一家由阿波罗全球管理拥有的爱荷华州急性护理设施中发生的一系列性侵事件,促使参议院出具了一份报告,其标题——“利润高于患者:私募股权对美国医疗体系的有害影响”——已说明了诸多问题,但即便如此,可能仍低估了事态的严重性。
对于经营阿波罗全球管理的亿万富翁们来说,寻找廉价资产不仅是一项事业,更成了一种爱好。2011年,阿波罗全球管理的联合创始人、布莱克的门生乔什·哈里斯 (Josh Harris) 收购了一家 NBA 球队——当时运气不佳的费城76人队。另一位联合创始人马克·罗文 (Marc Rowan) 则将目光投向了长岛的冲浪小镇蒙托克 (Montauk),在那里,他将一家价格亲民的海鲜小屋变成了高端餐厅,令许多当地人愤怒不已;这家餐厅在 2019 年提供一份售价 $54 的龙虾考布沙拉 (lobster Cobb salad) 和每瓶 $795 的桃红葡萄酒。
我想每个人都需要一个爱好。布莱克的爱好是艺术。2012年,他花费近 $1.2 亿美元购买了爱德华·蒙克 1895 年的素描画《呐喊》。那时,布莱克与爱泼斯坦早已交好,两人在 1996 年的一场婚礼上相识。他最终向这位被定罪的恋童癖者和注册性犯罪者支付了数千万美元。
布莱克与科汉详细谈论了他与爱泼斯坦的往来,大概是认为这本书可能有助于他洗清名声。科汉也给了布莱克充足的空间来为自己辩护,无论这种辩护看起来多么荒谬:布莱克声称,他向爱泼斯坦支付这些巨额款项——科汉指出,这比一流的华尔街信托与遗产律师的收费高出许多倍——完全是为了获取其税务和遗产规划建议。
科汉对此似乎持怀疑态度,但他也并未完全认可另一种看似更可信的解释:即爱泼斯坦与其说是财务顾问,不如说是布莱克的私人“清理人”,帮助他处理与众多女性的非法关系。
布莱克与爱泼斯坦纠葛的消息最早于 2019 年曝光。随后,在 2021 年 3 月,一名年轻的俄罗斯女性古泽尔·加尼耶娃 (Guzel Ganieva) 在 Twitter 上写道,她曾遭到布莱克的性虐待,而布莱克曾向她支付数百万美元的封口费。
几天后,布莱克从阿波罗全球管理辞职,任命罗文——而非长期渴望接任他的哈里斯——为首席执行官。几个月后,布莱克对哈里斯和加尼耶娃提起了一项 RICO(反敲诈勒索与腐败组织法)诉讼,指控他们共谋公开她的性虐待指控,企图将他赶走。布莱克的诉状将哈里斯比作“莎士比亚笔下的伊阿古”,声称哈里斯在得知自己被阿波罗全球管理的高管职位否决后,便将愤怒转向了他的前导师。
“很难想象我们竟然陷入了这种境地,”面对布莱克的指控,困惑的哈里斯告诉科汉。事实上,读到布莱克关于哈里斯那些失控的理论时,人们会想到另一个莎士比亚角色:李尔王。该诉讼于 2022 年被曼哈顿的一名联邦法官驳回。然而一年后,布莱克在加尼耶娃对他提起的民事诉讼中获胜,该诉讼指控他诽谤和性侵。
在铺陈这段肮脏的传奇故事时,科汉提供了许多相互矛盾的说法。这是我对这本书唯一真正的不满:科汉过于专注于让他的采访对象发表意见——或许是为了充分利用他极高的接触权限——以至于他将太多的叙事权交给了他们,而不是由自己强有力地塑造叙事。
去年三月,《纽约时报》的几位同事提出了一个令人信服的论点,认为爱泼斯坦提供的服务包括帮助布莱克掩盖他支付给十几名女性的数百万美元,其中至少有几人与他发生过性关系;布莱克否认了这一报道。无论出于何种原因,在《Money to Burn》一书中,科汉并未就布莱克故事核心的谜团得出自己的结论:他究竟在为什么而向爱泼斯坦付费?由此导致布莱克与爱泼斯坦的关系——以及随之而来的布莱克本人——的形象变得模糊不清。
撇开这个问题不谈,《Money to Burn》是一部引人入胜且具有价值的作品,它刻画了一个男人及其所处环境,而他们对积累个人财富那永无止境的痴迷,可能会考验你对资本主义的信心。此外,如果布莱克希望科汉能帮他挽回名誉,他可能会对最终成品感到失望,因为书中详细记录了他堕入声名狼藉的卑劣过程。
然而,笑话可能在我们这边。自从布莱克离开后,阿波罗全球管理 (Apollo Global Management) 在私人信贷市场采取了更激进的行动,利用其相对于银行和经纪公司的优势,因为后者的债务规模和贷款实践受到更为严格的监管。业务正蓬勃发展。到 2029 年,阿波罗的目标是管理 1.5 万亿美元的资产——这超过了印度尼西亚的国内生产总值(G.D.P.)。布莱克在公众舆论的法庭上已彻底名誉扫地,但他仍然是阿波罗最大的个人股东。凭借估计约 150 亿美元的个人财富,他无疑比以往任何时候都更加富有。
---
一名记者将一群在那个决定性十年中大获成功的人物聚集在一起。

特朗普总统七月在椭圆形办公室。
作者:RICK PERLSTEIN
有人说,列夫·托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》拥有由数百个有名有姓的角色演绎的无数情节和子情节,根本算不上是一部真正的小说。相反,所有这些细致的叙事特异性,都成了书中论文式批判的素材,而这些批判才真正关乎作者所关注的问题:历史学家如何将历史简化为过于整洁的类别,以此解释事情是如何演变的。“历史科学的任何结论,如果没有批判的最小努力,就会像尘埃一样瓦解,不留任何痕迹,”他坚持认为,因为“任何选定的历史单位总是任意的”——包括我们所谓的历史“时期”。
当美国咆哮时
20世纪80年代如何拯救,随后又破坏了这个国家——并引导我们走向今天
乔纳森·考夫曼 (Jonathan Kaufman) 著
Viking. 294 pp. $35.
托尔斯泰会尤其鄙视在我们的时代,许多历史书如何孤立出单一的十年或单一的一年,来“解释我们现在如何生活”。如果我们能给这位大师呈上一本名为《1969:一切改变之年》的书,接着是一本名为《1968:震撼世界的 [ ]》,然后是《1967:火与冰之 [ ]》,接着是《1966:十年爆发之 [ ]》,最后是《最后的纯真 [ ]:1964年的美国》,他会指出我们都应该看到的一点:如果每 [ ] 都可以被说是最重要的,那么它们就都不是。(他可能还会说 1965 需要一个更好的文学经纪人。)
“十年”类书籍的问题也是如此。然而这类书籍却在激增,或许是因为在文学界利润空间收窄、拥有出版品牌的公司要求可预测回报的时代,绑定于特定年代的巨著比更细致的作品更容易销售。
乔纳森·考夫曼 (Jonathan Kaufman) 的《当美国咆哮时:20世纪80年代如何拯救,随后又破坏了这个国家——并引导我们走向今天》(When America Roared: How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today) 绝非此类作品中最糟糕的一部。其组织理念是合理的:在罗纳德·里根总统任职期间对市场活力的拥抱,突破了紧接其前的那些年份的停滞与疏离,但反过来又导致了我们这个时代的不平等、疏离和民粹主义不满。
考夫曼通过他认为具有代表性的几个人物相互交织的故事来构建他的叙事,包括通用电气 (G.E.) 的超级首席执行官杰克·韦尔奇 (Jack Welch),他致力于对抗劳工组织;黑人投资者约翰·罗杰斯 (John Rogers),考夫曼认为他在 1980s 芝加哥的崛起为巴拉克·奥巴马铺平了道路;前反越战活动人士凯伦·努斯鲍姆 (Karen Nussbaum),她组织秘书们成立名为“9to5”工会的辉煌成功,启发了 1980 年同名热门电影;以及耶鲁大学毕业生埃文·沃尔夫森 (Evan Wolfson),他在保守派的抵制(斯库拉)与极左运动激进分子(卡律布狄斯)之间周旋,将同性婚姻变成了一个在法律上可以想象的目标。沿途有一些有用的见解,尽管没有一个是令人震惊的,有些则平庸至极;而且有些是不正确的。
回顾韦尔奇的传奇故事总是很有趣,他是一个在强大的工会、具有社区意识的企业和积极政府所构建的战后繁荣中长大的工人阶级孩子,而他随后自豪且无情地摧毁了所有这一切,从而毁掉了随后几代工人阶级孩子的未来前景
RICK PERLSTEIN 是多本书的作者,包括《里根之地:美国 1976-1980年代 的右转》(Reaganland: America's Right Turn 1976-1980)。
---
在他之后。
纳斯鲍姆成为了韦尔奇在叙事上的主要陪衬。她在 20 世纪 70 年代试图将那些在类似《广告狂人》般的办公室世界中疲于奔命的受害者转化为一种政治力量,但很快就撞上了所有 20 世纪末工会组织者都遇到的那堵墙。考夫曼称,在里根入主白宫后不久的 1981 年,一场“前所未有的对工会的攻击”开始了。
这种表述的问题在于,这场攻击绝非前所未有(在 20 世纪 40 年代之前,劳工煽动者经常被枪杀);而且在吉米·卡特总统任期结束时,其相关机制已然就绪。历史学家及新政支持者亚瑟·施莱辛格认为卡特对劳工阶层的忽视如此之深,以至于他说卡特实际上“不是一个民主党人——至少在比格罗弗兰德时期的定义更近的意义上不是”。这是一个典型的例子,说明了“改变一切的十年”这一框架掩盖的事实多于它所启发的认知。
考夫曼最清新且最有趣的贡献是他对马克·福勒的刻画,后者是里根任内的首任美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)主席。从考夫曼对他进行的采访中得知,福勒致力于消除对电视和广播播出的监管(他认为这是自由历史上一次改变世界的干预),其热情竟然源于他在大学时代担任摇滚 DJ 时,对必须填写日志记录播放了哪些歌曲和公益广告的厌烦之情,这令人着迷。
然而,令人沮丧的是,考夫曼在看待这次去监管化带来的重要后果之一——如拉什·林博等右翼激进电台主持人的崛起——时,出现了诸多错误。本书将他们的成功归结为简单的阶级怨恨而非政治:考夫曼主张,林博的听众“绝大多数是中低阶层的白人男性”,他们在报纸和公共广播为了追求更富裕的受众而“抛弃他们”后被遗忘了。无论从社会学还是意图来看,这都是不正确的;林博本人在 1991 年曾吹嘘,他优先接听使用车载电话的听众,因为这些人一定很有钱。
当考夫曼抛弃由市场锻造的“十年”概念之枷锁,转而讲述自己的生活故事时,《当美国咆哮时》达到了最佳状态。作为 20 世纪 80 年代末的一名年轻记者,他是《波士顿环球报》在天安门广场事件后抵达现场的第二名记者。当时,活动人士在北京街头散布碎玻璃瓶,以嘲讽中国领导人邓小平,因为他的名字听起来像中文里“小瓶”的读音。随后,他被派往崩溃中的东欧集团,在反对共产主义统治的最后抗议期间,他听到传闻称莱比锡的医院一直在储备血液,担心会出现天安门广场式的镇压。
托尔斯泰最喜欢的关于历史变迁的比喻涉及海洋。他在《战争与和平》中写道:“尽管历史之海的表面看似静止,但人类的运动却像时间的流动一样永不停歇。”你可以描述漂浮在表面的迷人事物,但要把握将它们带到那里、在一年或十年间潜行、并在沉入泡沫之下以促成未来潮汐转变的底层隐形暗流,则是大师之作。有些人能做到这一点——《奇怪的叛逆者:1979 与 21 世纪的诞生》中的克里斯蒂安·卡里尔是我特别欣赏的一位——但考夫曼在这里并未完全实现。不过,如果是一本关于他在共产主义瓦解时期担任年轻记者的回忆录,那将是我想要阅读的书。
---
在三本新的绘本中,年幼的孩子们在混乱、‘黏稠’且充满养分的家庭纽带中品尝到了独立的滋味。
---
家庭:离不开,也相处不来。除了长期的心理分析对象,还有谁比那些通过反抗混乱、黏稠且——在最理想的情况下——充满养分的纽带来尝试独立的孩子更懂得这一点?这是一个贯穿了无数经典儿童文学作品的主题。
三本出色的新书——每一本在想象力、敏感度和工艺上都堪称奇迹——接过了这个接力棒。所有这些书的艺术表现形式在主题和视觉上都如此大胆,以至于我在第一次翻开书页时,如果没惊呼出声,也会默默地在口中说一声“哇”,或者纯粹因为欣喜而大笑。
在这三本书中,克里斯蒂安·罗宾逊 (Christian Robinson) 的《爸爸》(Dad) 面向最年幼的读者。罗宾逊是 21 世纪最顶尖的绘本创作者之一,他不仅为自己的故事作画,也为他人作画——尤其是马特·德·拉·佩尼亚 (Matt de la Peña) 的《市场街最后一站》(Last Stop on Market Street),罗宾逊因此获得了凯迪科特奖荣誉奖(而德·拉·佩尼亚则获得了纽伯瑞奖金奖)。他的新书文字和前提都很简单:用简短的句子描述父亲的特质,并将其与动物父亲(以及少数人类父亲)的插图并列,这些插图采用了他标志性的拼贴与绘画相结合的风格。
针对“爸爸很强壮”,罗宾逊画了一只眼神警觉的大猩猩,它的身体像亨利·摩尔 (Henry Moore) 的雕塑一样沉稳而优雅,守护在孩子身边。你可以感受到
布鲁斯·汉迪 (BRUCE HANDY) 是作者,近期作品包括青少年电影历史书《好莱坞高中》(Hollywood High) 以及由朱莉·权 (Julie Kwon) 绘图的绘本《气球》(Balloon)。

这只类人猿粗壮前臂中的力量,以及它背部和肩膀那遮蔽性的曲线中所蕴含的爱。
“爸爸紧紧抱着”描绘了一只海马爸爸,育儿袋里装着宝宝,尾巴卷着一根海草。海洋
《爸爸》(DAD)
作者:克里斯蒂安·罗宾逊 (Christian Robinson)
Balzer + Bray 出版社。48 页。$19.99。
(适用年龄:3 至 6 岁)
《穆埃加诺斯》(THE MUÉGANOS)
作者:雅克·茹尔斯 (Jaque Jours)
Transit Children's Editions 出版社。48 页。$20.95。
(适用年龄:3 岁及以上)
《只有我》(NOBODY BUT ME)
作者:萨拉·隆德伯格 (Sara Lundberg)
译者:B.J. 伍德斯坦 (B.J. Woodstein)
Triangle Square 出版社。64 页。$21.95。
(适用年龄:4 至 7 岁)
深处是乌黑的颜色,因此我们只能从弯曲的海草中感受到强电流的威胁,以及银色海马多刺身体中那种保护性的紧张感。这是一个绝妙的构图。
虽然《爸爸》更多地倾向于依恋而非考验家庭纽带,但罗宾逊明智地承认父亲也可能有缺点。“爸爸需要很多空间。”(插图:一只露出牙齿、 grimacing 的鲨鱼。)“爸爸让你失望。”(一只无忧无虑的长臂猿忽略了它照顾的对象。)
“爸爸不得不离开”描绘了两只被留在巢中的小鸮。在它们身后,一个锯齿状的开口通向天空,感觉像一道伤口。在随审阅本附带的一封信中,罗宾逊写道,他自己的父亲“在他在成长过程中不在身边,而我自己现在还不是一个父亲”。对我来说,这段背景故事让一本出色的书变得更加非凡。
我提到过混乱、黏稠的纽带吗?初次创作的作者兼插画师雅克·茹尔斯 (Jaque Jours) 在《穆埃加诺斯》(The Muéganos) 中将其具象化了。这是一本非常幽默的书,讲述了一个名为“穆埃加诺斯”的兔子家庭,这个名字源于一种“传统的墨西哥糖果,由小方块状的油炸小麦面团用蜂蜜或 pilon-cillo 糖浆粘在一起而成”。(犹太读者可能会联想到 teiglach。)
在茹尔斯的混合媒介艺术描绘中,五个穆埃加诺斯——爸爸、妈妈和三个孩子(包括我们的主角朱莉娅)——在肩膀处连接在一起,兔子的脚在空中滑稽地晃荡。“他们从未分开,”她写道,“穆埃加诺爸爸说蜂蜜把他们粘在一起。妈妈说这是爱。朱莉娅觉得有点无聊。”
而就在这里,小说研习者和儿童心理学学生们,你们找到了最原始的冲突!
有一天,在参观博物馆时,朱莉娅想要独自走开、随心所欲地观看的这种“简单冲动”如此强烈,以至于让“某些东西产生了裂痕”。《Jours》描绘了这个家庭开始分崩离析,随后,随着页面的翻转,出现了一个令人震撼的画面:身材娇小但眼睛圆睁的朱莉娅独自处于一片黑色虚空之中,这同时也暗示了一页被撕掉的纸。她是感到兴奋、恐惧,还是仅仅被惊吓到了?大概三种感觉都有。
回到家中,家人试图弥补裂痕,但“有些事情就是不可避免的”,《Jours》用破碎的代尔夫特风格陶器阐明了这个真理。不过,她的结局是幸福的。真正充满爱的家庭会学会给彼此留出呼吸的空间。
由 B.J. Woodstein 翻译的萨拉·隆德伯格(Sara Lundberg)的《Nobody but Me》是一部杰作,其中一段没有文字的中段内容难以用简单的语言概括。
一个夏日,一个小男孩和妈妈一起去湖边。他渴望独立做点事情,于是解开了一个小型充气筏并漂离而去——这既是字面意义上的漂离,同时也是。
---
也许,是在那种昏昏欲睡的意义上。温柔的(起初是这样)水流带着他进行一场如梦似幻的旅程,穿过一片包围四周的森林,然后进入更广阔的世界,在那里,他发现了爱情(或者至少是友谊)以及危险,除此之外还有其他事物。
但不必担心:三个穿着叶裙的森林孩子——也许是精灵——充当守护者,防止麻烦失控。男孩在改变中地保持着原样,漂回母亲身边,手里紧握着一颗种子,回到家后他将其种下。它也将生长。
伦德伯格(Lundberg)是一位深受喜爱且屡获殊荣的瑞典绘本创作者,她在本作中采用了生动、流畅且具有绘画感的风格,让我想起大卫·霍克尼(David Hockney)晚期的风景画;让人想要潜入其中。
《Nobody but Me》可能并不适合每一个孩子或成年人,但它会触动许多人的内心深处,即便他们还不知道那究竟是什么。□
上方是克里斯蒂安·罗宾逊(Christian Robinson)为《Dad》创作的艺术作品。下方是雅克·茹尔斯(Jaque Jours)为《The Muéganos》(左)以及萨拉·伦德伯格(Sara Lundberg)为《Nobody but Me》创作的艺术作品。
---
本周 | 上周< / > 小说< / > 在榜周数< / > | 1< / > < / > 《HOLLOW BONES》,作者 Jodi Picoult。(Ballantine) 一位负责罗德岛州应急准备部的女性及其身为警察测谎专家的丈夫,面临着婚姻危机。< / > 1< / >< / > 2< / > $^{2}$ < / > 《THEO OF GOLDEN》,作者 Allen Levi。(Atria) 一个男人前往南方的一个小镇,在那里他购买当地居民的铅笔画,并用它们交换故事。< / > 42< / >< / > 3< / > < / > 《THE THOROUGHBREDS》,作者 Elin Hilderbrand 和 Shelby Cunningham。(Little, Brown) “学院”系列的第二本书。亲密关系和寄宿学校的稳定性受到质疑。< / > 1< / >< / > 4< / > $^{4}$ < / > 《THE CALAMITY CLUB》,作者 Kathryn Stockett。(Spiegel & Grau) 随着大萧条时期的日子变得更加艰难,几位女性寻找改善自身境遇的方法。< / > 20< / >< / > 5< / > < / > 《DEAD BEAT》,作者 Leigh Bardugo。(Flatiron) “第九号屋”系列的第三本书。亚历克斯及其盟友与在纽黑文和耶鲁大学校园中发现的恶魔作战。< / > 1< / >< / > 6< / > < / > 《EXIT PARTY》,作者 艾米莉·圣约翰·曼德尔。(Knopf) 在不久的将来,美国在经历另一场内战后,阿里·韦克(Ari Waker)踏上旅程以寻求一个谜团的答案。< / > 1< / >< / > 7< / > < / > 《WE CHASE SHADOWS》,作者 Richard Osman。(Pamela Dorman) “我们解决谋杀案”系列的第二本书。艾米、罗茜和史蒂夫追捕一名在逃杀手。< / > 1< / >< / > 8< / > < / > 《GRIM TIDINGS》,作者 B.K. Borison。(Avon) “Ghosted”系列的第二本书。一名不愿造成伤害的死神与一名守护天使结成了意想不到的同盟。< / > 1< / >< / > 9< / > $^{7}$ < / > 《DUNGEON CRAWLER CARL》,作者 Matt Dinniman。(Ace) 一名叫卡尔的海岸警卫队退伍军人和他前女友的猫——甜甜圈公主,被困在一个奇幻地牢中。< / > 37< / >< / > 10< / > $^{13}$ < / > 《VERITY》,作者 Colleen Hoover。(Grand Central) 洛温·阿什利(Lowen Ashleigh)被一名受伤作家的丈夫雇佣,以完成其热门系列作品,并揭开了一个恐怖的真相;该书被改编为电影。< / > 101< / > |
销售周期:9月13日至19日
本周< / > 上周< / > 非小说< / > 在榜周数< / >< / > 1< / > < / > 《THE PERILOUS FIGHT》,作者 Colin Kaepernick 与 Nick Chiles 合著。(Legacy Lit) 这位超级碗四分卫兼民权活动家描述了他生命中的决定性时刻及其结果。< / > 1< / >< / > 2< / > < / > 《END TIMES FASCISM》,作者 Naomi Klein 和 Astra Taylor。(Farrar, Straus & Giroux) 一项关于宗教原教旨主义者、硅谷技术专家和族群民族主义者共同信仰的调查。< / > 1< / >< / > 3< / > < / > 《ONE MAN IN》,作者 Christian Craighead。(Threshold Editions) 一名英国特种部队前士兵讲述了他如何在内罗比的一家酒店和办公综合体中与一支索马里族恐怖分子部队作战的经历。< / > 1< / >< / > 4< / > < / > 《CONFRONTING AMERICA》,作者 Bill
O'Reilly 和 Josh Hammer。(St. Martin's) 这位保守派评论员分享了他对教育、家庭、药物、工作和宗教的看法。 | 1< / > | 5< / > $^{15}$ < / > THE NERD REICH,作者 Gil Durán。(Avid Reader) 一位独立记者描绘了一种将以企业统治取代选举政府的新政治秩序。< / > 5< / >< / > 6< / > < / > LIVE LAUGH LOVE,作者 Kristin Kobes Du Mez。(Liveright) 《耶稣与约翰·韦恩》的作者探讨了美国白人基督教女性身份的历史。< / > 1< / >< / > 7< / > < / > PROFILES IN COWARDICE,作者 Jacob Weisberg。(Penguin Press) 讲述了八个人如何可能在特朗普总统获取独裁权力过程中扮演了共犯角色。< / > 1< / >< / > 8< / > $^{1}$ < / > THE COUNTERREVOLUTION,作者 Victor Davis Hanson。(Basic) 探讨特朗普总统离任期间对其第二任期的影响。< / > 2< / >< / > 9< / > $^{11}$ < / > THIS IS ME,作者 Hayden Panettiere。(Grand Central) 这位已故女演员描述了她如何应对名声。< / > 6< / >< / > 10< / > < / > REDWOOD,作者 本·麦金泰尔。(Crown) 《间谍与叛徒》的作者描绘了一名 MI6 秘密特工在 1981 年协助一名隐藏秘密的俄罗斯双面间谍的工作经历。< / > 1< / > |
《纽约时报》畅销书名单由《纽约时报》新闻部门的畅销书编辑组编译并存档,与《纽约时报》公司的评论、文化、广告和商业部门相互独立。排名反映了在美国出版的、提供广泛大众兴趣书籍的供应商以机密方式报告的单位销量。在线查询:欲获取完整名单及我们方法论的详细说明,请访问 www.nytimes.com / books / best-sellers。
---

---
Kuang 是一位成功的奇幻小说作家,在这部关于一名在台湾漂泊的美国学生的现实主义小说中,她再次探讨了语言与帝国之间的联系。通过聚焦于期中考试、姐妹关系和性等日常戏剧,她证明了自己在文学小说方面的造诣与在投机小说(speculative fiction)领域一样高;如果你不提前了解,很难想象她还能写其他风格的作品。

---
在这部关于弗吉尼亚州 Blow 种植园的详尽研究中——该地距离 1831 年纳特·特纳(Nat Turner)起义的地点不远——普利策奖得主、历史学家 Taylor 试图将传统与真相区分开来,仔细审视美国奴隶主内心交织的高尚同情心与令人胆寒的残酷。其结果就像是非虚构版本的威廉·福克纳的《亚巴舍伦,亚巴舍伦!》。

《SWITZY》,Emma Cline 著。(Random House 出版,352 pp. $32.)
Cline 的新小说进入了一位患有认知障碍的坚毅商人的内心世界,他正飞往瑞士结束自己的生命——但在那之前,他要面对一名在心理上占据极大分量的寄宿学校室友。作为一名布克奖提名者,这部作品与 Cline 早期以女性和青少年为中心的小说相比有显著转向,《Switzy》在很多方面都做得非常出色;Cline 将现代性的荒诞碎片精美地汇编在一起。
---
---

[...OMITTED...]
一名英国特种部队士兵讲述了他与内罗比一家酒店及办公综合体内的索马里族恐怖分子单位战斗的经历。 | 1< / > | 5< / > < / > LIVE LAUGH LOVE,作者 Kristin Kobes Du Mez。(Liveright) 美国白人基督教女性地位的历史。< / > 1< / >< / > 6< / > 7< / > THIS IS ME,作者 Hayden Panettiere。(Grand Central) 已故女演员描述了她如何应对名声。< / > 6< / >< / > 7< / > 1< / > THE COUNTERREVOLUTION,作者 Victor Davis Hanson。(Basic) 探讨特朗普总统离任期间对其第二任期的影响。< / > 2< / >< / > 8< / > 15< / > THE NERD REICH,作者 Gil Durán。(Avid Reader) 一位独立记者描绘了一种将以企业统治取代民选政府的新政治秩序。< / > 5< / >< / > 9< / > < / > PROFILES IN COWARDICE,作者 Jacob Weisberg。(Penguin Press) 八个人是如何可能在特朗普总统获取独裁权力过程中扮演共犯角色的。< / > 1< / >< / > 10< / > 5< / > REGIME CHANGE,作者 Maggie Haberman 和 Jonathan Swan。(Simon & Schuster) 两位《纽约时报》白宫记者深入探讨特朗普总统第二任期的第一年。< / > 13< / > |
星号 (\*) 表示该书的销量与上方书籍几乎没有区别。剑号 (†) 表示部分书店报告收到大宗订单。
---

《影子票》(SHADOW TICKET),作者:托马斯·品钦 (Thomas Pynchon)。(企鹅出版社。304 pp. $20。)
在经济大萧条时期的威斯康星州,不情愿担任私家侦探的希克斯·麦克塔加特 (Hicks McTaggart) 接到了一项看似简单的任务:寻找并带回一名离家出走的奶酪继承人。这份工作将他带到了东欧,在那里,他陷入了一个由摇摆舞者、摩托车法外之徒、苏联特工和纳粹组成的世界,这些元素以典型的品钦式冗余风格呈现。

《巴塞尔之塔:掌控世界的秘密银行之阴暗历史》(TOWER OF BASEL: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank That Runs the World),作者:亚当·勒博 (Adam LeBor)。(公共事务出版社。416 pp. $22.99。)
国际结算银行,被勒博称为“中央银行的银行”,是一个鲜为人知但处于世界经济中心的至关重要机构。他的这部著作最初出版于 2013, 记录了该银行充满争议的过去——在第二次世界大战期间,它是纳粹政权的至关重要支持者——旨在揭示全球金融在政治和道德上的影响。

《荒野》(THE WILDERNESS),作者:安吉拉·弗卢诺伊 (Angela Flournoy)。(海员出版社。304 pp. $18.99。)
弗卢诺伊的小说采用视角切换的叙述方式,追踪了四位朋友——德西蕾 (Desiree)、詹妮瓦里 (January)、莫妮卡 (Monique) 和纳基亚 (Nakia) 从 2008, 开始的二十年生活,讲述他们如何应对成年生活的压力、友谊以及日益动荡的 21 世纪。我们的评论员尼拉·奥尔 (Niela Orr) 称这本书证明了“一个人的内心如何变成一座鬼屋,其私人的幽灵随时间而累积”。
本周 | 上周< / > 平装商业小说< / > 在榜周数< / > | 1< / > 1< / > 《黄金之西奥》(THEO OF GOLDEN),作者:艾伦·利维 (Allen Levi)。(Atria 出版社)一名男子前往南方的一个小镇,在那里购买当地居民的铅笔画,并用它们交换故事。< / > 43< / >< / > 2< / > < / > 《阴森预兆》(GRIM TIDINGS),作者:B. K. 鲍里森 (B. K. Borison)。(Avon 出版社)《被鬼魂纠缠》(Ghosted) 系列的第二本书。一名不愿造成伤害的死神与一名守护天使结成了意想不到的同盟。< / > 1< / >< / > 3< / > 2< / > 《地牢爬行者卡尔》(DUNGEON CRAWLER CARL),作者:马特·丁尼曼 (Matt Dinniman)。(Ace 出版社)一名叫卡尔的海岸警卫队退伍军人及其前女友的猫——甜甜圈公主 (Princess Donut),被困在一个奇幻地牢中。< / > 38< / >< / > 4< / > 3< / > 《真实》(VERITY),作者:科琳·胡佛 (Colleen Hoover)。(Grand Central 出版社)洛温·阿什利 (Lowen Ashleigh) 被一名受伤作家的丈夫雇佣,随后揭开了一个恐怖的真相;该书被改编为电影。< / > 162< / >< / > 5< / > 4< / > 《脑损伤》(BRAIN DAMAGE),作者:弗里达·麦克法登 (Freida McFadden)。(Poisoned Pen 出版社)一名头部中弹的皮肤科医生试图拼凑她的记忆,并确定身边的人是否构成威胁。< / > 5< / >< / > 6< / > < / > 《女性》(THE WOMEN),作者:克里斯汀·汉娜 (Kristin Hannah)。(St. Martin's Griffin 出版社)一名护士跟随她的哥哥在越南战争期间服役,并回到了一个分裂的美国。< / > 1< / >< / > 7< / > 6< / > 《挽救计划》(PROJECT HAIL MARY),作者:安迪·威尔 (Andy Weir)。(Ballantine 出版社)人类的命运落在赖兰·格雷斯 (Ryland Grace) 的肩上;该书被改编为电影。< / > 65< / >< / > 8< / > < / > 《麻雀之盾》(SHIELD OF SPARROWS),作者:德夫尼·佩里 (Devney Perry)。(Red Tower 出版社)一名公主在逐步进入自己选择的角色(而非被选择的
her. | 1< / > | 9< / > 8< / > 《卡尔的末日场景》(CARL'S DOOMSDAY SCENARIO),作者:马特·丁尼曼(Matt Dinniman)。(Ace 出版社)“地牢爬行者卡尔”(Dungeon Crawler Carl)系列的第二本书。< / > 7< / >< / > 10< / > 7< / > 《荒野暗岸》(WILD DARK SHORE),作者:夏洛特·麦康纳基(Charlotte McConaghy)。(Flatiron 出版社)一名女子被冲上南极附近的一座小岛,岛上唯一的居民是一名男子及其三个孩子。< / > 3< / >< / > 11< / > 10< / > 《恋爱假设》(THE LOVE HYPOTHESIS),作者:阿里·哈泽尔伍德(Ali Hazelwood)。(Berkley 出版社)一名年轻教授同意假装成一名三年级博士候选人的男友。< / > 45< / >< / > 12< / > 12< / > 《红色崛起》(RED RISING),作者:皮尔斯·布朗(Pierce Brown)。(Del Rey 出版社)在未来的火星社会中,一名处于最低阶层的人混入人类统治者之中,希望将其推翻。< / > 14< / >< / > 13< / > 9< / > 《我可怕的亲爱的》(MY DREADFUL DARLING),作者:H. D. 卡尔顿(H. D. Carlton)。(ZPN 出版社)
雷弗里·亚当斯(Reverie Adams)试图将黑暗的过去抛在脑后,但德雷德富尔·夏普(Dreadful Sharpe)的复仇欲望使其卷土重来。< / > 3< / >< / > 14< / > 13< / > 《荆棘与玫瑰之庭》(A COURT OF THORNS AND ROSES),作者:莎拉·J. 玛斯(Sarah J. Maas)。(Bloomsbury 出版社)费尔(Feyre)被带离家乡,置于精灵的世界之中。< / > 88< / >< / > 15< / > 14< / > 《离婚》(THE DIVORCE),作者:弗里达·麦法登(Freida McFadden)。(Poisoned Pen 出版社)在丈夫结束婚姻后,娜奥米(Naomi)怀疑自己可能处于危险之中。< / > 16< / > |
销量定义为在书籍正式出版之日或之后,供应商与个人最终用户之间完成的交易。书籍销量经过统计加权,以按比例代表并准确反映全国所有销售渠道的情况。报告零售商小组具有全面性,反映了美国境内数万家各种规模和人口统计特征门店的销售情况。在线详情:有关我们方法的完整说明,请访问 www.nytimes.com / books / best-sellers。
---
让忙碌的早晨不再如此手忙脚乱。
---

探索如“10分钟或更短时间搞定早餐”之类的食谱集。
报道来自每个大洲的气候消息。
---
这位获奖作家回忆起她将其视为最重要的文学导师之一的男人。
一位伟大的导师能给我们信心去展望自己的作品,而此时我们仍能感受到背后那只温柔的手,始终在帮助我们前行。在我的生命中,绝大部分时间里我都感受到温德尔·贝里的文学之手在我的肩胛之间,因此,在他 8 月以 92 岁之高龄去世后,醒来发现这个世界上再也没有他,这令我感到震惊。我现在唯一想读的文字就是他的。首先,《宣言:疯狂农民解放阵线》在今天早晨建议我,去询问那些没有答案的问题。去投资于千禧年。
... 种植红杉。
说你的主作物是那片
你并未种植、
且你无法活到收获之时的森林。
说叶片在腐烂成
霉层时便已收获。
将其称为利润。预言这样的回报。
该宣言进一步指示我,将信仰寄托于腐殖质,倾听腐肉之声,预见世界的终结并大笑。以起义的勇气,向更好的自我宣誓效忠:
一旦将军们和政客们能够预测你的思维动向,就抛弃它。将其作为标记虚假路径的迹象,即你没有走的那条路。像狐狸一样,留下比必要更多的足迹,其中一些指向错误的方向。实践复活。
温德尔和我相差一代人,但我们共同融入了一种极其重视邻里文明的文化。我们这些乡村人大多很有礼貌。这有助于我们相处,被再次邀请,有时还能在不经意间将反叛之意带进门。即便是在最奢华的社交场合,即便是在教堂里。这就是温德尔·贝里的力量。他是一个热情、幽默、温文尔雅的人,而且他知道什么是正确的——在我看来,他总是能准确把握。他在纸页上呈现这些观点时带有如此抒情的从容,以至于读者可能需要一段时间才能意识到其中蕴含的一连串内心爆炸。你最终面对的是新鲜的真理和一些需要清算的账目,并且能清晰地感觉到这是一份礼物。
作为一名作家,他很早就脱颖而出,首先是在斯坦福大学担任斯特格纳研究员,随后在纽约大学任教。他受到文人阶层的赞赏,但对他与家乡之间日益增长的距离感到不安。他的学术同行警告他不要离开文化之都;他们肯定认为,一个肯塔基州的农民诗人注定会在文学界籍籍无名。
事实证明,对于温德尔来说,“成为名人”的含义与他们不同。他在 1969 年出版的第一本随笔集《长腿屋》(The Long-Legged House)中,论证了人性中依赖于归属感的部分。如果没有塑造我们的那些人和地方,我们就有失去完整自我的风险。对于作家兼普通人温德尔·贝里来说,肯塔基州的一个农场就是上帝见证的真理。“我所支持的,就是我所立足的地方,”他说,并用余生证明了这一点。
对于乡村孩子来说,这是一条被走烂了的路:出去寻找你的财富。我自己也曾追随这条路,被对质朴生活的尴尬以及通常被称为“机遇”的光芒所诱导,从而离开了肯塔基州。然而,在进入这座神庙之后,我发现直到我能将我的家乡视为一种其自身具有惊人特质的文化之都时,我才找到了值得讲述的话题。我要感谢少数几位作家照亮了我回家的环形之路,但其中绝大部分要归功于温德尔·贝里。
生活和工作在基于土地的经济中的人们,早已习惯被那些更都市化的人称为落后,贝里的作品有时也承受了这种轻视。但他与落后恰恰相反;他是具有预见性的。《美国的动荡》(The Unsettling of America,1977年)是他关于我们与养育我们的土地之间疏离之危险的开创性著作,

2012 年的温德尔·贝里。
---
这在今天比他五十年前写下这段话时更具紧迫性。如果仍有读者怀疑一个农民能给他们带来多少启示,那是他们的损失。
他的散文、《安息日诗集》(Sabbath Poems)、波特威廉(Port William)系列小说——《汉娜·库尔特》(Hannah Coulter)、《杰伯·克罗》(Jayber Crow)、《老杰克的记忆》(The Memory of Old Jack),这些作品表面上都十分平静,实则是深藏惊艳之美的湖泊。在狭小空间中生活的可能性是世界的镜像,因为坦白说,任何地方在某种意义上都是狭小的。在拥有之物中寻找喜悦,而非渴求未有之物,是一种普世的宽慰;同样,考虑到“现在是我 / 的这块土地碎片”仅仅是在此经过,也能抚慰任何存在主义的恐惧:“它正处于 / 从一棵树、 / 一群鱼、一只鳖、 / 一群鸟的形态中 / 转换而来的途中。它将再次 / 经过所有这些形态。”
谁不想在未来的某一天成为一群鸟呢?回到《宣言》(Manifesto),我们都需要学习如何“在考虑了所有事实之后 / 依然保持快乐”。
他的小说在出生与死亡之间未铺砌的道路上行走,将人间喜剧与优雅融合得令人心碎。
他的诗作将神圣之物捧在掌心。为了追求某种可能被误认为简单的风格,他的逻辑流向清晰而复杂;他的散文包含着多元的内涵。他最著名的文章之一《我为什么不买电脑》挑战了我们对技术原教旨主义的崇拜——这并非因为贝里是一个卢德分子,或者未能意识到他的妻子塔尼娅(Tanya)作为编辑、打字员和不可或缺的伙伴的价值。他也不反对能帮助我们做好工作的工具。相反,他在那种认为新事物总是优于旧事物的信念中看到了危险。(如果你是一个凡人,你可能会思考这一点。)他看到了为了解决我们并不拥有的问题而无休止地购买解决方案的浪费,以及在一种建立在不断更换财产和自我的虚幻幸福之上的悲剧:对于那些负担不起的人来说,这是一种具有破坏性的教条,对于那些负担得起的人来说亦然。
最重要的是,他拥有罕见的洞察力,能够看待一件东西——任何东西——不仅是在获取的那一刻,而是看待它从矿产开采、制造与运输的混乱过程到消费者手中,以及之后被送往我们称之为“垃圾填埋场”的亵渎之地的整个过程。他促使我们也这样做,并鼓起勇气询问:“我的需求是否足够重要,以至于要给世界造成这样的伤害?”他没有说要做,或不要做。他只是说去观察。拓宽你的视野,再次观察。
我不记得有什么时候是我不知道温德尔·贝里的。在我还小到能想象出一匹高贵的挽马与我们嘈杂的约翰迪尔(John Deere)拖拉机之间的区别,并由衷同意“少即是多”的时候,我的祖母就谈论过“那个不喜欢拖拉机的家伙”。他和我的父亲——巧合的是两人都叫温德尔——曾共同努力帮助保护肯塔基州一些美丽且受到威胁的地区,因为他们共同相信这些荒野之地是神圣的。在我父亲去世后不久我见到他时,温德尔告诉我:“他们会回到我们身边的。”
这是我所知道的关于悲伤最真实、最温柔的劝慰,在他的诗作《挚爱之人》(The Loved Ones)中得到了完美的呈现。在最初的那些日子里,我们被匮乏感和失去本身所浸透:无论是意外、疾病还是最后的衰竭。只有随着时间的推移,“我们称之为死者的挚爱之人”才会以完整的自我回到我们的记忆和梦境中,然后:
我们感觉到,在我们没有想到他们的时候,他们一直就在身边。他们就那样在这里,在我们被各种义务分散注意力时,就那样等待着。最终我们明白了:他们现在生活在永恒的世界里。而我们才是缺席的人。
我今天就接受这份劝慰。他会回到我们身边的。他现在就在这里,就在这些文字之中。他的诗作《留在家里》(Stay Home)承诺道:
我将站在森林中,那里古老的树木仅随风而动,随后随重力而落。在树林的静谧中,我回到了家。不要跟我来。你也留在家里。
一棵巨树向重力屈服了。不,不是屈服,而是接纳。我将遵循温德尔的教诲,留在这些依然属于我的大地碎片之中,在能力范围内利用它们,去培育一个地方,一个家庭,一份精神寄托,一个邻里。将那里称为家,并继续前行。
芭芭拉·金索尔弗(BARBARA KINGSOLVER)著有 10 部小说,最近一部是获得普利策奖的《铜头蛇》(Demon Copperhead)。她的新小说《帕蒂塔》(Partita)将于本月出版。
---
小学时,我和一个富有想象力的伙伴曾试图把课间休息变成一场“卡尔文球”比赛。这项,呃,运动,出自比尔·沃特森那部令人愉悦的漫画《卡尔文与霍布斯》,它只有一条规则:“你不能两次以同样的方式进行比赛。”
也许正是随之而来的那种无政府状态,解释了为什么我在初中时会对《龙与地下城》的规则书如此痴迷。
我青少年时期的阅读口味偏向推想文学,倾向于那些遵循其世界精确规则的书籍。只要被某种逻辑所约束——无论这种逻辑多么古怪或奇妙——天马行空的想象都是极好的。在大量运用世界观构建的小说中,少量的规章制度总能起到很大作用。这两本截然不同的书都符合这一特点。
---
皮克或许是 20 世纪上半叶最具有风格的英国幻想作家——无论是在他的散文、着装还是姿态上。他被提及的次数远低于他应得的关注,不过每当他被提及时,通常是与同时代的 J.R.R. 托尔金和 C.S. 路易斯被一同提及。
这些并非完美的类比。皮克那部未完成的杰作——《戈门加斯特》系列的前两本书,其宏大程度堪比《指环王》或纳尼亚系列小说。但它们不采用宏大的寓言,而是交易一种哥特式的、荒诞主义的阶级讽刺。此外,书中没有魔法。
戈门加斯特是一座大得不可思议、迷宫般且破败的城堡,居住在其中的被一位《华盛顿邮报》评论家称为“阴险的狄更斯式怪胎”,他们拥有像阿尔弗雷德·普鲁内斯夸勒和阿比亚萨·斯韦尔特这样绝妙的名字。(猜猜哪个是厨师。)
然后是泰特斯·格罗恩,未来的戈门加斯特第 77 代伯爵。在该系列的第一本书中,他在婴儿期快结束时出生并继承了头衔。在他周围,古怪的成年人们过着由晦涩仪式主导的生活,这些仪式像囚禁他们的堡垒一样永恒且腐朽。甚至早餐都要遵循仪式:在整个早餐过程中,仪式大师会大声朗读当天剩余的仪式内容。
皮克自己的语言与其神话体系一样曲折。然而,它却在吟唱。“沉闷的仪式转动其轮盘,”他写道,“在这堵墙内,内心的躁动被每一寸沉睡的阴影所嘲弄。激情不过如烛火般微小,在时间的哈欠中闪烁,因为巨大的、阴森的戈门加斯特,将比一切都崩塌得更彻底。”
如果你喜欢聆听你的传说,西蒙·万斯的有声书演绎绝对值得你花时间。另外,也可以尝试运气去搜寻那部相当疯狂但被不公正诋毁的 BBC💡 迷你剧。
推荐人群:如果你喜欢苏珊娜·克拉克 的《乔纳森·斯特兰奇与诺瑞尔先生》;达芙妮·杜穆里埃 的《蝴蝶梦》;特别是《麦克白》中的女巫场景;以及带有烟草、石楠花和 / 或沼泽香桃木气味的蜡烛。
---
如果你之前读过这本书,请随时打断我:一名年轻女性与一条龙建立了心灵感应,在一家父权体制机构中崭露头角,并与一名强大的龙骑士陷入浪漫情缘。
但这并不是丽贝卡·亚罗斯(Rebecca Yarros)的畅销奇幻小说《第四翼》(Fourth Wing)。如果麦凯弗里今天还活着,她将年满100岁——如果你称她为“浪漫奇幻”(romantasy)作家,她向你喷出的火可能比她和亚罗斯笔下所有的龙加起来还要猛烈。
《龙骑士》开启了极具影响力的《Pern 的龙骑士》系列。尽管其设定类似于中世纪且有喷火怪兽,但麦凯弗里将其视为科学幻想小说。(这里也没有魔法。)
Pern 是一颗曾由航天地球人定居的行星,其起源和技术在很大程度上已随时间流逝而失传。这里的龙是经过基因工程改造的。一种无意识的、丝线状的外星孢子会从天而降,其时间间隔由其原生流浪行星的古怪轨道决定。此外,还涉及一些时间旅行。
大多数人都忘记了 许多法律存在的原因。距离上一次外星威胁已经过去了一个多世纪。 人为什么要担心石造封建领地缝隙中生长的小块草丛?你是什么意思,说那种地外物质会极其痛苦地吞噬其路径上的所有有机物?
在其他居民以致命的方式得知这些问题的答案之前,心怀复仇的孤儿莱莎(Lessa)必须与一条金色龙后建立纽带,并与一名冷漠的龙骑士 F'lar 合作以拯救世界。虽然赌注很高,但这并非传统的快节奏页翻书; 的历史和政治过于复杂,无法如此简单。但 世界的丰富性使得每次访问后都更难离开——即便你永远不想住在那里。
如果你喜欢以下内容,请阅读本书:梅赛德斯·拉克伊(Mercedes Lackey)的瓦尔德马(Valdemar)系列;克里斯托弗·保利尼(Christopher Paolini)的《遗产》(Inheritance Cycle)系列;领养宠物并瞬间成为它在地球上最喜爱之物的快感;以及关于乔治·R.R. 马丁的《冰与火之歌》系列是否秘密地属于科学幻想小说的无休止争论。
我们将最优秀的文学对话带给你。
纽约时报
书评
播客
“书评”播客由书评编辑吉尔伯特·克鲁兹(Gilbert Cruz)主持,由《纽约时报》提供支持。当今顶尖的作家和评论家将与来自全球最具影响力的书评编辑一起,探讨他们正在阅读的内容以及推动文学对话的动力。
每周更新。在任何你收听播客的平台订阅。nytimes.com / bookreviewpodcast
The New York Times

Oh, Canada! In "True North," the veteran travel writer Paul Theroux crisscrosses the country of his forebears for insights about how it differs from his own. BY JENNIFER SZALAI | PAGE 9
---


The New York Times
OCTOBER 4, 2026

---
6 Fantasy
Reviewed by Jennifer Harlan
8 EXIT PARTY
By Emily St. John Mandel
Reviewed by Lincoln Michel
11 THE BREAKUP
By Kurt Andersen
Reviewed by Jonathan Dee
14 THE NEWER WORLD
By Sebastian Barry
Reviewed by Ian McGuire
---
7 GONZO NEUROTIC
The Best (and Not So Best) of Jerry Stahl
By Jerry Stahl
CORNER BOY
Loiterings New and Old
By Nik Cohn
Reviewed by Dwight Garner
9 TRUE NORTH
On the Road in Canada
By Paul Theroux
Reviewed by Jennifer Szalai
10 REDWOOD The Untold Story of the Cold War's Most Extraordinary Spy By Ben Macintyre Reviewed by Joseph Finder
15 ROLL THE CALLS
A Memoir
By Ari Emanuel
Reviewed by Alexandra Jacobs
16 MONEY TO BURN
The Unvarnished Truth About Leon Black, Apollo, and the Rise of a New Wall Street
By William D. Cohan
Reviewed by Jonathan Mahler
17 WHEN AMERICA ROARED
How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today
By Jonathan Kaufman
Reviewed by Rick Perlstein
---
18 DAD By Christian Robinson
THE MUÉGANOS
By Jaque Jours
NOBODY BUT ME
By Sara Lundberg
Reviewed by Bruce Handy
---
5 By the Book
Katt Williams
12 Essay
"Interview With the Vampire" at 50
By Christopher Rice
22 Appraisal
Wendell Berry
By Barbara Kingsolver
23 Read Like the Wind Lessons in World-Building By John Maher
Etc.
4 Letters
19 Best-Seller Lists
19 Editors' Choice
20 Paperback Row
Cover illustration by Nada Hayek


Prepare today's college students to become tomorrow's global citizens.
Get campuswide access to The New York Times. Learn more at nytimes.com/campuswide

The New York Times
50
hours baking with stand mixers
24 batches of cookies
10 hours whipping cream by hand
Learn more at nytimes.com/hellowirecutter

The New York Times
Wirecutter
One easy way
to sweeten
your kitchen

The New York Times
Make prep time the new playtime.
Cooking

Explore recipe collections like Recipes to Cook With Your Kids.
nytcooking.com
Letters

Read It and Weep
TO THE EDITOR:
Regarding Erik Piepenburg's essay "How DNF Became A-OK" (Sept. 13): On the question of whether one has to finish a book once one has started it, Samuel Johnson had a characteristically robust view. "This is surely a strange advice," he pronounced. "You may as well resolve that whatever men you happen to get acquainted with, you are to keep to them for life." But to discover this you need to get to almost the very end of James Boswell's "The Life of Samuel Johnson" — Page 934 in the Penguin Classics edition. I can't help suspecting that Boswell was having a joke at the reader's expense.
ADRIAN JOHNS CHICAGO
---
TO THE EDITOR:
I would only add that if you really don't like that book, don't just put it on the DNF shelf. Rip it up — with gusto!
JUDITH JACKSON
IRASBURG, VT.
Moving Mountains
TO THE EDITOR:
W.M. Akers's review of "The Everest Mystery," by Julie Summers and Jochen Hemmleb (Sept. 6), adds to the growing fascination with George Mallory's early attempts to reach the summit of Everest.
Readers might also like to know about an acclaimed 2011 book by Wade Davis, "Into the Silence: The Great War, Mal-
lory, and the Conquest of Everest." It features the Canadian surveyor Oliver Wheeler, another overlooked and important character who figured out the route to the North Col, the main gateway to Everest's summit for Mallory, and created the first map of Everest. (Wheeler also introduced photo-topographical mapping techniques to the Himalayas.)
Davis looks at how Mallory's English upper-class upbringing influenced his treatment of Wheeler, who was from a former British colony. “Wheeler’s Everest,” a stunning documentary, is based on Davis's book and counts on the author's participation along with that of Wheeler's great-grandson Jeff.
HEATHER MACANDREW
VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA
Off Base
TO THE EDITOR:
Dwight Garner, in his review of “The Disappearers,” by Marlon James (Sept. 13), claims that “James is casually funny in a way Faulkner rarely is.” I’ve often found Faulkner “casually funny” even in his most tragic novels. One of my favorite moments comes in “The Sound and the Fury” when a paranoid Jason Compson, asked if he has his money on the Yankees after their Murderers’ Row season in 1927, says he’d never bet on any team with “that fellow Ruth” on it. That’s the same Ruth who hit a record-breaking 60 home runs in 1927.
RICHARD PETERSON
MAKANDA, ILL.
BOOKS@NYTIMES.COM


'Reading wasn't a hobby. It was my first hustle,' the comedian writes in 'Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines,' his new memoir, which also explains why he ran into trouble with Dr. Seuss.
---
By subject matter. I like knowing where to go when I'm looking for something specific. I've always looked at books as resources, not decoration. So the shelves have to make sense to me.
---
Most people probably don't know that I'm a gardener or how much I genuinely enjoy it, so they might be surprised by how many gardening books I have. There's something about growing things that teaches you patience. You have to understand what something needs, give it the right environment, and then let it become what it's supposed to become. I think there's a lesson in that.
---
As a kid, there were a lot of things I didn't have access to, but I had access to books. So if there was something I wanted to understand, I could go find a book about it. History, religion, business, science, people. I could teach myself. That's why I call it my first hustle. A hustle is figuring out how to use what you have to get what you need. What I had was the ability to read, the curiosity to keep going and enough sense to understand that knowing something other people didn't know could be an advantage.
---
"The Swiss Family Robinson" changed my life. There was something about the adventure, the ingenuity, this family having to figure out how to survive and create a whole world with what they had. "The Diary of Anne Frank" was another one. I was young, but I understood that I was reading the words of somebody who had actually lived this. That made it different.
And then there was Stephen King. At some point I had to admit: I respect how good you are, Mr. King, but I also enjoy sleeping.
---
If you've read seven or eight hundred autobiographies of other people, you assume that at some point you have to add your name to that conversation. And as incredible as a hundred million views may be, that work still belongs to the internet. We haven't had the internet for thousands of years. Books, we have. There's something different about putting your story in a form that can sit on a shelf, get passed from one person to another, and still be there long after whatever platform is popular today is gone.
---
By going around calling myself Katt in the Hat and making money doing it. Apparently, that will get you a cease-and-desist. I was just a young comedian trying to build a name for myself. I wasn't thinking about trademarks or intellectual property. I was thinking, "Katt in the Hat — that's funny." They were thinking something entirely different.
---
No, I was allowed to read pretty much anything I wanted. There was even a period in my life when all I wanted was to find the list of forbidden books so I could read every one. Because if you tell me a book is forbidden, now I need to know why. What kind of information could be so volatile that somebody decided I shouldn't have access to it?
---
The Torah. Everything. It reminded me that I don't think you can really read a book and not walk away with something.
---
J.R.R. Tolkien, Mark Twain and Jack London. Tolkien because I'd want to understand how somebody builds an entire world in their mind with that much detail and then convinces everybody else that it exists. Mark Twain because he understood how to use humor to tell the truth about society. Jack London because there was something fearless about his writing and his life. Put them at the table and I'm not even sure I'd say that much. I'd just want to see what they argued about.
BIG-TIME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL-PRESS PUBLISHERS
Independent publishers and authors of not-so-independent means receive special discounted advertising rates every Sunday in The New York Times Book Review.
For more information, please contact Kayla Chowdhury at kayla.chowdhury@nytimes.com
Reach an influential audience for less.
The New York Times
Book Review
nytimes.com/bookreview
We take the government to court year after year to make sure it can't hide information from taxpayers on topics like health, safety and education.
The New York Times
WORDLE, CONNECTIONS, SPELLING BEE, MINIS AND MORE!
Wordle, Connections,
Spelling Bee, Minis and more
The New York Times Games

EDITED BY JOEL FAGLIANO
200+ puzzles and games. Get Puzzle Mania! Today!
Available wherever books are sold.

puzzlemaniabook.com

New books from Lex Croucher, Mollyhall Seeley and Elizabeth DeLozier will whisk you away to magical new places.
READING THE UNMAGICAL LIFE OF BRIAR JONES (Harper Voyager, 447 pp., \$32) — the adult debut by Croucher, who has written several charming young adult novels — I completely lost my grip on time. I was so engrossed in the book, so immersed in the author's imagination, I forgot to eat dinner. When I finally emerged, I was exhausted, starving, a bit teary-eyed and totally exhilarated.
The novel follows Briar and Sebastian, inseparable childhood best friends who dreamed of attending the Temple School of Thaumaturgy — an upper-crust English institution whose curriculum is rumored to include sorcery — together. When the friends were 11, Seb was admitted to Temple, but Briar (who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns) was not, leaving Briar utterly crushed.
When the book picks up, it's seven years later, and Briar and Seb haven't spoken since. Then Briar takes a temp job at Temple. When they arrive, their hopes of magic's existence are realized — but they also discover that sensitive Seb has transformed into the
JENNIFER HARLAN is an editor, and the fantasy columnist, at the Book Review.
most powerful member of a gang of evil upperclassmen. Briar quickly finds their own group: the posh nerd Westby, dandy Tate and firecracker Hadley, who form a queer-friendly bubble within the traditionalist school. Something, Briar learns, is very rotten at the heart of Temple, and the four-some is determined to dismantle it.
Croucher is a deliciously witty writer, with a knack for seamless pop culture references, and is especially effective at writing about the camaraderie that blooms when you and your companions are running for your lives. Briar's story — part action adventure, part tender second-chance romance — is a moving meditation on friendship and trust, class and power, the terrible choices that do not have to define us. It's my favorite fantasy novel I've read all year. I would happily skip more meals to hang out with this gang again.
SEELEY TAKES A spikier approach to friendship in her debut novel, WE HEXED THE MOON (Saga Press, 215 pp., paperback, \$18). Jen, Goldie, Maycie and Harding are four best friends caught, in the summer of 2014, in that liminal space between senior year of high school and the rest of their lives. Like so many bored teenage girls before them, they decide to fill one of their waning days together with a ritual — complete with candles, blood offerings and an incantation courtesy of Tumblr — to summon the moon.
Unfortunately for them, the spell works. The moon vanishes from the sky, shows up in corporeal form in Jen's bedroom and refuses to return to her thankless perch, where nobody even sacrifices virgins to her anymore. The girls have 10 hours to find her replacement, she says, or the world as they know it will end.
The novel is written in the breathless rush of adolescence — a white-hot folie à quatre fueled by nostalgia and milkshakes. Things get messy (and I'm not just talking about the plotting, which I do wish had been tauter, especially given the book's brevity). But then, that's how these friendships go sometimes: burning impossibly bright and flaming out like a supernova.
"They'd never, never be as real," Goldie thinks, "never as fully alive as it was possible to be in Maycie's falling-down old house in a bed with your three best friends, still young, still hungry, still flayed alive on the altar of being a girl."
MUCH IS MADE of the symbiosis between fantasy and romance, but I would like to put in a plug for that other intoxicating hybrid: the fantasy mystery, which infuses the hairpin pleasures of a whodunit with a bit of magic. In THE WHITECHAPEL FULL MOON SOCIETY (Dutton, 354 pp., paperback, \$20), the thrills come from the hunt for the infamous Jack the Ripper. And you can probably guess, from the lycanthropic title, where the paranormal comes in.
Our heroine, Caroline, is the recently orphaned daughter of a debt-strapped nobleman. Forced to sell her family estate, she sets off for London hoping to find her beloved older brother, Charlie, who has stopped answering her letters.
The city is smog-choked and simmering with hysteria over a recent spate of murders. It's also seductive — especially for a novel-obsessed girl who has long dreamed of seeing the world beyond her manor. When Caroline arrives at Charlie's boarding-house, the titular Whitechapel Full Moon Society, he's not there. But there's something fishy about the way the landlady and boarders — especially Rab, Charlie's chemist best friend — dodge her questions. So Caroline gives them a fake last name and takes a job as the house's maid, determined to excavate their secrets.
Caroline is not the most competent sleuth, but DeLozier paints her and the other Whitechapel residents with such warmth I forgave her fumbling, even when it gummed up the mystery. The author also brings great humanity to the Ripper's victims, marrying supernatural terrors to the very real ones faced by women (especially single, economically vulnerable ones) — a story that tragically continues today.
Two career-spanning essay collections, from Nik Cohn and Jerry Stahl, revel in life's margins and recapture auras past.
By DWIGHT GARNER
"FIRST OF ALL," Michael Kinsley wrote in the preface to one of the collections of his columns, "I don't want any grief about throwing together a bunch of old articles and calling it a book." He liked this sort of volume (so do I) because they're a "way to recapture the flavor of the recent past."
Two longtime freelance scene-makers, Nik Cohn and Jerry Stahl, have new collections out soon. They're dissimilar writers in many ways, but read together, the commonalities really begin to pile up.
CORNER BOY
Loiterings New and Old
By Nik Cohn
ZE Books. 372 pp. \$35.
GONZO NEUROTIC
The Best (and Not-So-Best) of Jerry Stahl
By Jerry Stahl
ZE Books. 444 pp. \$24.
Neither is a mainstream type (their work doesn't go well with the furniture) and each practices a form of journalism that might be called loitering with intent. Each was born in the middle of the last century (Cohn in 1946, Stahl in 1953) and each wrote for a slew of music magazines, alt-weeklies, and slick and lowlife outlets that aren't around any longer. Each has admitted smuggling fiction into what appeared to be fact pieces.
Each was a drug addict, though only Stahl made a career out of it. His junkie memoir, “Permanent Midnight,” from 1995, was turned into a film with Ben Stiller. Each is Jewish. Each wrote more books than most people are aware of.
Each wants to semi-disown his most popular work. In Cohn's case, that's "Tribal Rites of a New Saturday Night," a 1976 New York magazine article about the disco and club scenes in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, that inspired the movie "Saturday Night Fever." He later admitted he'd made most of it up, and seemed surprised people hadn't known all along. In Stahl's case, he made a killing writing for "ALF," the late-1980s NBC sitcom about a furry alien.
Each took an interest in unknown and marginal souls and wrote profiles of people like boxers, preachers, night court defense lawyers, barbers and exuberant peddlers of bedspreads. Each speaks about having a heavy freight of impostor syndrome.
Each of their new, career-spanning collections — which include essays, reviews, profiles, think pieces and random blurts — is issued by ZE Books, the iconoclastic independent publishing house. Cohn's is called "Corner Boy." Stahl's is "Gonzo Neurotic."
I'm going to begin with "Corner Boy," be-
DWIGHT GARNER has been a book critic for The Times since 2008, and before that was an editor at the Book Review for a decade.

Nik Cohn
cause Cohn's stuff is more to my taste. He's cool to the touch, for the most part, while Stahl has an over-the-top, Hunter S. Thompson meets Anthony Bourdain meets Cosmo Kramer (he's always bumping into the things he's writing about) shtick, a maniacal style I dug when I was 17 but now mostly clangs on my ears.
Cohn grew up amid the rubble of post-World War II London and was in the exact demographic place to feel the detonation of Elvis Presley, the Beatles, the Rolling Stones and the Who across a formerly dull, gray landscape. He was a pioneering rock critic, the author of “Awopbopalooob Alopbamboom” (1970), a landmark early history of rock.
His music writing was ardent, fond and knowing, and it had bite. He mostly loathed Bob Dylan (“the whining dentist’s drill in his voice”). While the Stones were his favorite band — he wrote about them as crude, mean, vital liberators — he thought they’d gone soft and posh by the late 1960s. He infuriated Mick Jagger by writing that a) he’d gradually lose his hair and b) the band wasn’t meant to get old. “If they have any sense of neatness,” Cohn wrote, “they’ll get themselves killed in an air crash, three days before their 30th birthdays.”
There are profiles of Phil Spector, Grace Jones and Gary Stewart, the honky-tonk renegade who's back on the radar thanks to Jimmy McDonough's recent biography. But Cohn was more interested, ultimately, in trends and scenes, in what was happening on the streets. He wrote a book — “The Heart of the World” (1992) — about walking up Broadway, from Battery Park to
Times Square, and about those he met along the way.
This collection's best piece might be one about Teddy Boys, the truculent, middle-finger-giving subculture that sprang up in London after the war. The Teds, as they were often known, wore Edwardian-style jackets, drainpipe trousers, slim-jim ties and combed their greased hair into pompadours. They mattered, Cohn writes, because England's teens had previously been so bland and sheeplike and deferential to their elders. The Teds gave the world a blueprint for all future teen revolts.
Cohn bores down into fashion. Indeed, the Teddy Boys piece is adapted from his book "Today There Are No Gentlemen: The Changes in Englishmen's Clothes Since the War" (1971), now so scarce that the few extant copies sell for enormous sums.
Cohn returns repeatedly to New Orleans, where he has sometimes lived, and he has good antennae for how the city, mostly below sea level, pulls your spirit around with its strange tides. He describes walking the
Nik Cohn infuriated Mick Jagger by predicting that he'd lose his hair.

Jerry Stahl, right, with Ben Stiller in 1997.
French Quarter with Pete Townshend in 1972; Townshend is so blown away by the life-affirming chaos that all he can do is utter a long string of expletives.
Cohn was an aspiring rap producer in the city, and he wrote a good book about it — “Triksta: Life and Death and New Orleans Rap” (2005) — that’s excerpted here. He’s witty about all the things that can go wrong in a recording studio. The excerpt is strewed with lines like, "I'd seen dead men in coffins before, but none who'd been shot in the face."
Cohn has revised some of these old pieces, cutting them down and rewriting. He refers to this process as “remixing.” (Stahl has done the same thing.) I’m of two minds about this practice, but rare is the writer who can resist airbrushing old material and deleting idiocies.
YOU CAN INFER the tone of Stahl's book, "Gonzo Neurotic," by its title and by the first sentence of the author's note up front: "I would rather have testicle surgery, on horseback, performed by Special K-crazed lumberjacks, than sit down and read my old writing."
Well, that makes two of us, a reader is tempted to respond. In truth, Stahl is funny, self-aware and very much in on his own “professional ex-junkie” act. His pieces may fly off the tee like screaming bananas, to borrow a bit of golf slang. (I don’t play golf.) But he’s a more sober observer than he lets on.
There are essays here on the Miss America pageant — Stahl asks each contestant, hoping to shake them out of their canned responses, “What’s the worst thing that’s ever happened to you?” — and a nudist colony. Amid the meditation rooms and hydropools, he thinks to himself: “If I’m lucky I just might find Gay Talese’s wallet!”
Stahl writes about the making of “Café Flesh” (1982), the postapocalyptic porn film he co-wrote that became a cult classic. He profiles, or tries to profile (this book includes a lot of write-arounds), Marlon Brando, Benicio Del Toro, the wild-eyed TV host Tom Snyder and Hugh Grant’s short-term girlfriend Divine Brown. He wrote for “Twin Peaks” and says he was fired for turning in scripts with blood and hair on them. There are semi-believable pieces about being the Joey Chestnut of heroin.
He writes about honeymoon suites, religious television and appearing on “Oprah.” There’s a piece about ruining his liver (“my big pink organ”) that segues into a wildcat appreciation of the liver steak at Musso & Frank Grill in Los Angeles, “roughly the width of a car seat and the length of a baby’s forearm.”
Stahl is his own vivid comic invention. Life whooshes past him like arrows, and some of those arrows stick in his guts. He wonders if Ray Kroc, the McDonald's innovator, knows how much his restaurants have meant to generations of junkies. Stahl has a survivor's wariness and takes the long view. He asks, in what might be the best bit of self-help language I've ever stumbled across, "Maybe that's as close to happiness as you get — not making other people unhappy."
Ben Ratliff, the journalist and rock critic, edited Cohn's "Corner Boy." In his introduction he delivers a line that applies to both writers: "His writing on any subject is for anyone who believes that the best option is usually off the menu."
In Emily St. John Mandel's new novel, two versions of America's future crash into each other.

---
THESE DAYS AMERICANS of varying stripes worry the country faces a perilous future. Could the nation collapse into civil war? Or might it descend into a dystopian authoritarian state? In Emily St. John Mandel's ambitious and captivating new novel, "Exit Party," the answer is: maybe both.
“Exit Party” opens in a 2031 Los Angeles after “the United States had come undone following a coup d’état” where states seceded and “war had broken out within the month.” But for now, the fighting is over, the curfew in the Republic of California has been lifted, and people are ready to let loose.
Ari Waker, recently released from prison for attempted murder, joins her roommate
LINCOLN MICHEL is the author of the novels "Metallic Realms" and "The Body Scout." He writes the weekly newsletter Counter Craft.
Gloria in attending a party at her friend Kareem's apartment. Gloria is secretly pregnant with Kareem's child and traumatized by a loyalist suicide bombing that occurred at "a crowded house party" in the early days of the chaos. "When I think about parties, I think about bombs," she confesses.
EXIT PARTY
By Emily St. John Mandel
Knopf. 301 pp. \$32.
Still, the friends go . . . and then things get odd. Doppelgängers of some guests arrive while Kareem disappears without a trace. A painting, “Swan Dive,” materializes in the middle of the kitchen floor, but while Ari stares, it vanishes, “blinked out of existence.”
These events spawn a series of interlocking mysteries that the novel explores over 300 pages, a century of time and a large cast of characters. It is tricky to summarize this multilayered novel without spoiling the pleasures of its construction, but readers should know that “Exit Party” takes place in two crisscrossing universes with differing dark visions of America’s future. “There was a world where my homeland had fractured into disarray,” one character explains, “and another where my homeland had closed like a fist.”
In timeline A, Ari enters the post-collapse gig economy, taking odd jobs for militias vying for control of the former states. The narrative jumps to the future, where an older and wealthier Ari has settled in the “elite center of Paris” that’s encased in a weather-controlled dome shaped like “a series of giant soap bubbles,” protecting the rich from the ravages of climate change and pandemics. Ari lives a comfortable life as an art collector focused on “Post-Collapse Formalism.” One of her prized pieces is “Swan Dive,” which she purchased from a desperate Gloria. Then one day she is visited by Sebastian, Glo ria's now teenage son, who has come to steal the mysterious painting.
In timeline B, Ibari — Ari's double — lives a quite different life. Instead of a criminal, she's a government spy in the Internal Security Service of the authoritarian United States. While other countries in this multiverse “crumbled,” the State survived by knowing that “the difference between mayhem and order is control.” In this future, every neighbor is watching the other and if you attend “pro-democracy demonstrations” you might be turned into “a ghost” no longer “entitled to a home, or health care, or the protections of the law.”
Crafting memorable characters is always a challenge, and Mandel doubles the task for herself with her two timelines. Even so, she succeeds. Her characters are distinct in both worlds as the novel explores how circumstances determine our fates. The novel also sharply renders the psychology of formerly privileged Americans in a world turned, for them, upside down. “I just never wanted to be a part of history,” one party guest laments.
WHAT REMAINS MUDDIER are the two future Americas. Similar to Alex Garland's film "Civil War" (2024), "Exit Party" avoids discussing politics and ideology even when describing political upheaval and ideological struggle. America A is the product of an unexplained civil war along unclear fault lines. America B is a "surveillance state" of informants meeting in bureaucratic offices that could exist anywhere. Both feel more allegorical than extensions of America's specific history or its existing internecine and authoritarian tendencies, where partisan allegiances are loudly declared and surveillance is enabled via tech corporations and consumer complicity.
Still, “Exit Party” does so much so well — from tense action sequences to an inventive structure that switches up P.O.V. and form — that the novel will rightly entrance new readers while gripping Mandel’s existing ones. “Exit Party” feels like the culmination of her career so far, combining the thrills and mysteries of the author’s early crime novels with the expansive premises and speculative ruminations of later novels like “Station Eleven.” In addition to thematic connections to her prior books, there are literal ones: Ari Waker is a central character in “The Singer’s Gun” and the painter of “Swan Dive” appears in “The Glass Hotel.”
“If you live long enough,” Gloria’s double says, “you become a migrant from another timeline.” The world we know is always disappearing. “Exit Party” raises important questions about who people are when not just personal but societal circumstances change. Is everyone capable of murder or heroism? Crime or complicity? Despair or rebellion? As the narrator pointedly asks near the novel’s close, “Who will you be at the end of the world?”
The veteran travel writer Paul Theroux crisscrosses the country of his forebears for insights about how it differs from his own.

By JENNIFER SZALAI
AMONG Donald Trump's signature achievements when it comes to Canada — starting a trade war, threatening annexation, insulting its people, wrecking a longstanding alliance just because he could — the president has also managed to make a travel book about Canada improbably timely.
In “True North: On the Road in Canada,” Paul Theroux describes how an exploration of his ancestral roots in Quebec grew into a cross-country account of what Canada is and what it means to the people who live there. Canadians happen to know plenty about the United States; with its comparatively tiny population of 41 million, Canada
TRUE NORTH
On the Road in Canada
By Paul Theroux
Mariner. 423 pp. \$32.
has long paid close attention to its hulking neighbor as a matter of necessity. (I was born in Toronto.) Needless to say, the reverse hasn't been true, despite a history of American attempts to annex Canada that ended up going nowhere. “Canadians are the strangers next door,” Theroux writes. The country “is a blur to most Americans.”
Theroux, 85, presents this travel book — his 12th — as his last. “The planet is overrun with travelers and tourists, like ants on a bruised peach,” he writes, with his characteristic mix of grumpiness and verve. Having chronicled his far-flung journeys to places like Patagonia and China in previous books, Theroux says he now prefers puttering around his homes in Hawaii and on Cape Cod, where he can also sit at his desk and write his (many) novels. As a self-identified traveler, he long eschewed a tourist’s comforts, enduring the ordeal of a “decrepit bus station” or a “malodorous flophouse” in order to talk to the locals.
And talk to the locals he does. Most of “True North” recounts his conversations across Canada, with only the occasional mention of anything as obvious as a monument or a museum. He presses Canadians to “generalize” about differences between them and Americans, and gets a range of answers. Some are familiar, like the notion that Canadians are more deferential to authority and willing to work for the common good. Others are more striking. A woman in Belleville, Ontario, the birthplace of Theroux’s grandmother, considers Americans “a fearful people,” and points to the fact that they have so many guns. She asks Theroux what Americans are so afraid of. “That’s obvious,” he says. “They’re afraid of other Americans with guns.”
The book, like Theroux's journey, is mostly organized geographically, though
JENNIFER SZALAI is the nonfiction critic at The Times.
he begins with some family history in Yamaska — a tiny municipality in Quebec, where a Theroux named Antoine settled with his wife and children more than 300 years ago. The long history of these Canadian forebears is lovingly reconstructed, in often inordinate detail, and it's only when Paul Theroux himself crosses the border that the book's pace picks up.
He took a trip to freezing Ottawa in early 2022, after he heard that truckers protesting anti-pandemic measures had descended on Canada's capital in what they called a “Freedom Convoy.” Some of the organizers issued a written demand to replace the government. He wandered through the chaos, agape at the rare sight of Canadian disorder.
The non-convoy Canadians who talked to Theroux were almost unanimously appalled. He also notes that though about 20 percent of Canadian truckers are Pakistani or Sikh, you wouldn't know it from the protesters he saw. As it happened, nearly half the donations for the trucker protests came from the United States. As an article in The London Review of Books put it in April 2022, “Americans were directly funding a movement whose stated goal was to overthrow the democratically elected government of a neighboring country.”
Three years later, shortly after Trump began his second term, Theroux found that the president's barrage of insults had effectively united otherwise fractious groups of Canadians in their patriotism. Their rage has been sharpened by the sting of betrayal. Canadians put a lot of stock in fairness; a “nice country you’ve got there” shakedown is widely seen as repugnant — a violation all the more heinous when perpetrated by one’s closest ally. As one Toronto salesman tells him, “We’ve been a good friend and neighbor, we’ve fought side by side in all your wars — and what do we get for it? Abuse.”
But “True North” isn’t a flattering one-note narrative of Canadian valor. Theroux talks to Indigenous people who share devastating stories of children being abducted and sent to the country’s notorious residential schools, the last of which closed in 1997. He wonders aloud whether Canada’s approach to immigrants — promoting a “mosaic” of variegated cultures instead of a melting pot of assimilation — may have encouraged some newcomers to stay in their unassimilated “ethno-bubbles” rather than to identify with their adopted country. “No bubble dwellers seemed much troubled by the American president’s threat to make Canada the 51st state,” he writes.
Then again, that “seemed” is doing an awful lot of work. “True North” is inevitably an impressionistic book, filled with Theroux’s observations and interpretations. He’s a rambler, weaving in bits and
---
bobs of interviews, news reports, history and literary criticism. He admires the work of Robertson Davies, Margaret Atwood and Mavis Gallant, even if the stories of Alice Munro have always left him cold. "I find them overlong and wordy," he complains, "their landscapes cerebral and agitated and indoors."
Theroux, for his part, is usually charming, even when he's cranky, and even when acting the braggy American, recalling instances of Canadians telling him how much they love his work.
"True North" is the final book in Theroux's North American road trip trilogy, which began with "Deep South" and continued with "On the Plain of Snakes," about his travels in Mexico. During an especially spectacular drive in British Columbia, he has "as close to a spiritual experience as I'd ever had."
He is already hoping to return. Crossing the border into the United States, he notices the inscription on the Peace Arch, with its lofty sentiment that now reads like a poignant memento: “Children of a Common Mother — May These Gates Never Be Closed.” □
In his new book, Ben Macintyre tells the story of a Russian spy in Iran who betrayed his country in exchange for an unusual request.
By JOSEPH FINDER
THE BRITISH WRITER Ben Macintyre has made an illustrious career of taking dusty government archives and transforming them into propulsive nonfiction thrillers. His “Operation Mincemeat” was adapted for both screen and stage, and “A Spy Among Friends” became a TV series. With his latest, “Redwood,” he has done it again. The story centers on the defection of the K.G.B. major Vladimir Kuzichkin, who was stationed in Tehran during the chaos following the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
REDWOOD
The Untold Story of the Cold War's
Most Extraordinary Spy
By Ben Macintyre
Crown. 393 pp. \$32.
The reason for his defection wasn't ideology or money but sex. Specifically, he suffered from erectile dysfunction. Kuzichkin was sure that the cause was "anatomical," an overly tight foreskin, and that a circumcision would resolve it. Afraid that the Iranians or the Soviets might discover his impairment, he insisted the operation be performed in the West. "Kuzichkin was the first spy in history," Macintyre writes, "to demand, as the price of defection, the removal of his foreskin." That insistence, Macintyre argues, altered the history of the Middle East.
The stakes were enormous. The fall of the shah had deprived Washington of its closest ally in the region, the hostage crisis had severed relations with Tehran and the Soviet invasion of neighboring Afghanistan had increased fears of a greater Kremlin expansion. Iran, which shared a long border with the Soviet Union and was now at war with Iraq, seemed particularly vulnerable. Western intelligence was especially concerned about the Tudeh, Iran's pro-Soviet Communist Party, which had penetrated the government and the military. What they didn't know was how extensive the penetration was — or when Moscow intended to exploit it.
On Oct. 1, 1981, Kuzichkin entered the British Embassy in Tehran, presented himself as a vice consul with an “urgent” matter to discuss, and told Nicholas Barrington, Britain’s senior diplomat in Tehran, that he wanted to spy for Britain.
MI6 code-named him REDWOOD. He stood over 6 feet 4 inches, a head taller than his case officer; the cryptonym was chosen for the world's tallest tree (the standard rule that code names be unrevealing is, as Macintyre observes, ignored by every service on earth). Nobody in London noticed the additional double entendre
JOSEPH FINDER, who writes frequently about Russia, is the author of 17 novels including, most recently, "The Oligarch's Daughter."
until later — RED for communist, WOOD for the thing he could not achieve.
For eight months, Kuzichkin spied from the Soviet Embassy, and what he produced was extraordinary. His intelligence portrayed the Tudeh Party as a Soviet-funded puppet, directed (and very likely armed) by the K.G.B.
Astonishingly, Macintyre writes, MI6 gave everything that Kuzichkin revealed to the ayatollah — “every Tudeh leader, every informant inside the government, every member of the military underground, every K.G.B. officer and spy in Iran” — with Kuzichkin himself presenting the evidence at a secret meeting in Islamabad.
MI6 had also revealed their source and plans to the C.I.A. director William Casey. In 1982, Casey gave the operation "full-throated American support," believing that he was thereby "signing the death warrant of the Communist Party in Iran," Macintyre writes, which meant putting "the lives of several thousand people at risk."
Casey likely kept the C.I.A.'s involvement concealed not just from the Soviets but from his own government, Macintyre explains, so President Reagan could truly claim ignorance of the damning fact that the United States was publicly denouncing the Khomeini regime while secretly cooperating with it. "It is unclear," Macintyre hedges, "whether Bill Casey sought or obtained Ronald Reagan's authorization."
In Macintyre's telling, the American spy chief was working from an interagency memo warning that the Soviets could take Iran in nine to 14 weeks, a scenario that raised the possibility of an American nuclear response. But not everyone shared the panic. Macintyre himself doubts that Moscow intended to invade. The evidence for such a plan was thin. The Tudeh Party was too weak to seize power on its own, and, in the short term at least, the Kremlin also had reasons to tolerate Khomeini: However hostile he was to communism, he was even more hostile to the United States.
To forestall a danger that might have been largely imaginary, between 6,000 and 10,000 Tudeh members were apprehended and locked up, Macintyre claims, and hundreds or perhaps thousands of people died. Tudeh leaders were tortured, forced into televised confessions, and, in some cases, executed or lynched. A far wider wave of killings followed in 1988, when Khomeini

The K.G.B. agent Vladimir Kuzichkin with his wife, Galina, at a Tehran botanical garden in 1977.
---
issued a fatwa against those who “make war against God,” and prisoners who had already completed their sentences were put to death. “The exact Tudeh death toll may never be known,” Macintyre writes. “The executioners were not counting.”
Macintyre's verdict is that “the REDWOOD case was both a success and a failure, a ploy that ended in victory and defeat, a significant achievement and a grave mistake, proof of the fickle pattern of unintended consequences.” By stoking the Islamic Republic’s paranoia and brutality and helping the mullahs to consolidate power, America and Britain, he writes, “inadvertently helped create the monster” they now condemn.
Macintyre's larger point — that the Iran of 2026 was not foreseeable from Century
House in 1982 — is unarguable, and his parallel to the arming of the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan is well made.
But, of course, the consequences were foreseen, at least by some of the people who carried it out. Two senior officials said they would resign. One of them predicted that the people named in the REDWOOD files would meet “grisly ends.” British agents anticipated the crackdown. They were told, and yet they proceeded.
This doesn't mean that Casey and the MI6 members who backed the plan were cleareyed about its prospects for success. By Cold War logic, the liquidation of a bunch of communists barely mattered, especially if it could keep Iran from becoming a Soviet satellite.
One of Macintyre's more audacious conclusions is that had Viagra existed in 1981, Kuzichkin might not have defected, and there might have been a successful Tudeh coup after all with the help of Soviet firepower. The Cold War might have ended differently, or catastrophically.
It is a startling counterfactual, and one somewhat at odds with Macintyre's own skepticism about the Soviet threat. In fact, the Tudeh Party wasn't popular, even within Iran's fractured left, especially after the party joined a crackdown against independent secular and Islamist leftists who turned against the
ayatollah in the immediate aftermath of the revolution. And, despite this show of loyalty, the Islamic Republic was soon closing off the political space in which the Tudeh Party operated. By the early 1980s, its newspaper had been shut down and its official protection was wavering. Given the party's isolation and the regime's growing grip on power, a Tudeh takeover was far from inevitable.
The book's last pages are its saddest. Resettled as Alexander Larkin, a British citizen, Kuzichkin drank, ranted about hit men and was once picked up naked at a Somerset service station. One evening in 2009 he sat down with a bottle of vodka and the film "Amadeus," a story of betrayal. By morning there was nothing left in the bottle, and Kuzichkin was dead. (Until quite recently, Wikipedia still had him living.) "In his cups," Macintyre reports, he grieved the people he had helped send to their graves. The defector reached a harsher verdict than his historian does. But only one of them was there.
Set just 19 years in the future, Kurt Andersen's novel follows a family navigating a nation ruptured by civil war.

By JONATHAN DEE
NOVELS SET IN THE FUTURE aren't exclusively the province of science fiction; anxious times tend to generate anxious, cautionary literary dystopias, and when was the last time you can remember not feeling anxious? The 20th century in particular abounded in such visions, some of which — "The Handmaid's Tale," or "Brave New World," published in 1932 and getting spookier every day — have proved more prophetic than others. They're best understood, though, not as genuine bets on our future, but as dreamlike unleashings of present-day fear over the blind volatility of the moment.
THE BREAKUP
By Kurt Andersen
Random House. 556 pp. \$30.
Kurt Andersen, in his new novel “The Breakup,” does something few such books do (Jon Raymond’s excellent 2022 climate-disaster novel, “Denial,” comes to mind); he sets his stage not in some distant century when our own problems are the stuff of history, but a mere 19 years from now, when most of his readers are still likely to be around.
In an effort to game out the frightening liminality of American life in 2026, he depicts a 2045 in which — some years after a short, dirty, rather brilliantly imagined second American civil war — the country has fractured into two sloppily distinct but still official entities: the United States of America (now down to 39 states) and the Free American Republic, a largely white and Christian throwback to certain retrograde ideals with which we are all, here in the present, glumly familiar.
With peacetime established, the entirety of the former United States is allowed to vote on which of these two entities they want to join. Thus there is, this time around, nothing so geographically and imaginatively neat as a Mason-Dixon line; travelers through Southern states, for instance — where urban areas don't want to be part of the F.A.R. any more than the F.A.R. wants them — are crossing and recrossing “national” boundaries all the time. Not secession, but “disunion”: As solutions, go, it's a mess, but at least it's halted the terrorist drone attacks and the Army's responsive deployment of robots to kill rebellious American citizens in the streets. For now.
Our docents through this new American life are a family called the Zimbalists, whose own lines of fracture mirror the nation's, as they are very much aware. In
JONATHAN DEE is the author of eight novels, most recently "Sugar Street," and the director of the graduate writing program at Syracuse University.
2044, the family moved from Tennessee to San Francisco so that Asher Zimbalist could take a job running a hazily defined "Institute" on behalf of a person who may be that most elusive of species, the altruistic billionaire. But Asher's wife, Natalie, couldn't bear the culture shock. She's a poet, of all things, though one who has earned some cultural infamy as a sort of plain-spoken, Lionel Shriver-coded abuser of liberal pieties; six months ago, she moved back to Tennessee.
So have they broken up for good? Is politics to blame? They themselves aren't sure (nor are their two children), and now their hand is forced by the imminence of a long-planned tour of prospective colleges for their younger child, Logan. This tour will take them through the newly reconfigured heartland of America.
It's a good setup. What's puzzling is that more than 300 pages of the novel go by before the engine of the Zimbalist family car, and thus of the novel's plot, finally turns over, and the much-touted road trip begins. Before that comes a vast and dramatically static stretch of what speculative-fiction circles often call “world-building” — a full, inventive, elaborately detailed portrait of Andersen’s vision of the next 19 years of American history. It’s fun to read, particularly since it involves the imagined fates of a great many present-day famous people. (Among the many dozens of such cameos, surely one spoiler won’t hurt: Elon Musk dies of an overdose en route to Mars.)
As a novelist, Andersen — whose works of nonfiction include “Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire” and “Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America” — is more philosopher than plot maker. The will-they-or-won’t-they domestic drama of the Zimbalists, when it finally gets out of the driveway, is less than suspenseful; it is very much like spending a week in a car with three people laughing at a series of inside jokes and then explaining to you why those jokes are funny.
---
But so what? Domestic dramas are already thick on the ground in American fiction. What readers of “The Breakup” will come for, in this moment of what seems like unsustainable polarization and anger and wanton trampling of American civic institutions and ideals, is a vision of our near-term future that is violent and admonitory and cathartically terrible and yet somehow still survivable. On that score, Andersen delivers the dopamine hit that has made his previous work best sellers. In his 2045, there’s still a new Sally Rooney novel (one with a very funny title), and the government even offers tax credits to book publishers who hire human beings as copy editors instead of just letting A.I. do it. How dystopian can things be? □
IN THE EARLY 1980S, a small group of my mother's readers attended one of her book signings in costume. It was the first time this had ever happened. The event was a sedate gathering in a small, warmly lit San Francisco bookstore. Outside, the surrounding concrete landscape of imposing civic buildings was seemingly a world away from lush, oak-filled New Orleans, the hometown Anne had rendered as a living, breathing character in the few novels she'd published by then, a place to which her name would later become inextricably linked.
The book being casually celebrated that night was a spectacular doorstop of a novel with impressionistic angels on the cover. “Cry to Heaven,” it was called, and it explored the lives of castrato opera singers in 18th-century Italy. Wine and cheese were served. No line formed at the signing table. A slow drip of artist friends and my father’s colleagues from San Francisco State University stopped by — nothing like the glittering seven-hour marathons that would come a few years later, where exhausted managers would keep their giant stores open well past closing time to accommodate the snaking line of bejeweled Goths eager to get the latest Vampire Chronicle signed.
Without warning, in walked a trio of handsome young men in 18th-century waistcoats, their thick ponytails tied off with ribbon. I was young, but I recognized their costumes. They were characters from my mother's literary debut, published shortly before I was born. A book that haunted our lives like a pesky ghost — a critically reviled flop called “Interview With the Vampire.”
If that description seems harsh, rest assured it was my mother's own assessment of the initial reception to "Interview," which she shared on Facebook decades later. That night, as she posed for pictures with her handsome admirers, the atmosphere inside the store turned electric. Anne blushed. Her laughter took on a white-hot, unguarded quality. The first proud foot soldiers of a growing fandom had marched inside the rarefied air of a gussied-up literary party to which the guests had mostly been drawn by my father's local celebrity as a poet.
Until then, Anne Rice had been viewed as a transgressive, not-quite popular author of lusty historical fiction who had been roundly scorned by critics after daring to write a vampire's account of his long, immortal life with serious and probing literary consideration. The famous historical novelist James Michener had praised its audacity, but initial plaudits were few. These were the days when comparing a work of fiction to a comic book could erase its literary merit to most readers, and that's exactly what The New York Times did to my mother's first novel. Most of the unsold copies were pulped at the warehouse, a moment my mother would bitterly recall to the end of her life. Today, those who call "Interview With the Vampire" an "instant best seller" are carrying on a fiction as enduring as the novel itself.
But books can follow a twisty and unpredictable path to success. In the years after its disappointing publication, groups of marginalized readers gradually discovered “Interview With the Vampire.” By 1982, their collective passion was not only spreading, it was strong enough to inspire cosplay. That foggy San Francisco night was the first time it became clear to all of us that my mother's debut was being transformed from a flop into a cult classic. The costumed men were proof — elegant caricatures of Louis and Lestat, stepping out of the wet gray evening in their silky garb.
A few days later, my family gathered around the kitchen table of our Edwardian home in the Castro District, studying the photos of my mother and her admirers with excited wonder. Yes, the men were striking. But the pictures felt hot to the touch for a different reason. They were evidence that Anne's once-dismissed debut was gaining a second life, particularly among the dispossessed and outsiders — the queer, although the term was still very much a slur in those days.
Only recently did I remember how another character from “Interview” stepped out of the fog that evening, but in a more subtle and indirect way.
A trusted aunt had been my babysitter for the evening. She guided me through the store, introducing me to my parents' old friends who were there — the poets, professors, sculptors and painters who'd filled their raucous parties in the Berkeley Hills before my birth. We came to one friend particularly known for his loose lips and love of alcohol. With a wild-eyed grin he chucked my chubby cheek. "He looks like Mouse!" he cried.
Suddenly my aunt was pushing me through a forest of grown-ups as he repeated the strange words in our wake.

I looked like a mouse? No sense in getting my feelings hurt, my aunt explained. Like so many of my parents' friends, the guy was eccentric. The moment passed.
A few years later, it returned with clarity.
One day at my highly progressive elementary school, my classmates and I were learning how to make family trees. After one kid cracked a joke about how to include dead relatives, my teacher upbraided him for being insensitive. "After all," she said, "Christopher had a sister who died."
"I most certainly did not," I answered with the prim officiousness of a precocious boy raised at the adults' table by two liberal writers. I repeated the words with an insistence that brought my classmates to hysterics. "I most certainly did not."
I wasn't angry. My teacher was confused, that was all. But the wilting gravity in her expression told me I was wrong. In a moment, my entire world changed.
Mouse, as it turned out, had been my parents' nickname for Michele, the daughter they'd lost shortly before I was born, a girl I still refer to as my sister with some struggle given I will never know for myself what her voice sounded like. Her enormous brown eyes earned her the nickname. For her first four years on earth, she was a radiant, doll-like little girl. Then one afternoon she walked into the kitchen and said, "Mommy, I'm too tired to play," prompting my mother to gaze down at her with deepening dread. What 4-year-old is too tired to play?
Michele's losing battle with leukemia cast my parents in the dark saga that gave birth to "Interview With the Vampire." And so in a way, Claudia, the child vampire frozen in her youth who completes the tragic trio at the novel's center, made an appearance at that San Francisco book signing as well, even if she didn't come in costume.
Why did they keep the secret from me? Simply put, they'd lost one child to a blood-borne illness and been granted another beset by anxiety. They didn't want to unleash the tragedy of what they'd endured on a son who could already hysterically imagine his bed was circled by sharks. But once I knew, they reacted with stunning generosity and candor. All the doors to their hidden past opened.
The crude drawings that hung on the walls of my father's home office? They weren't the work of a former neighbor's child, as he'd once told me. My every question about Michele was answered with bracing, unguarded truth. What her voice sounded like, what foods she loved. (I don't know how the child of a professor and a struggling writer managed to taste escargot, but it was one of

---
her favorites.) The only barrier to my quest for information was my own hesitation to hear the quake of grief enter my mother's voice or watch a wet sheen appear in my father's eyes.
For years, I continued this halting interview of my parents about their defining tragedy, and for years my parents responded to every query with gentleness and honesty. If the interview had a climax, it came almost a decade after it began, when the three of us sat at a table outside a New Orleans restaurant. My mother's success had allowed us to move there in 1988 when I was 10. Three years later I had worked up the nerve to ask the question that had plagued me from the beginning. "What happened the day she died?"
We'd visited many other parts of their journey by then. I knew about the letters from leading cancer centers
that said my sister's case was hopeless. I knew that, at the doctor's recommendation, my parents never gave Michele her exact diagnosis or prognosis, just the constant, gentle refrain that she was ill and needed care. I even knew about the blood bag that burst next to her hospital bed the night before she died, and the last words she'd said to my father when he'd promised they would clean it up. "For me, your baby," she'd said softly.
But I didn't know about that awful, final day.
And so they told me. They told me about the alarm that went off when her heartbeat dropped below a certain rate. They told me about the doctor who exhausted himself performing CPR before he said sadly, "We're kidding ourselves here." They told me about the light kiss goodbye my father gave her on the lips, only to be startled by the soft give of lifelessness that greeted it. And together, at a table on a leafy, sun-drenched New Orleans avenue, the three of us cried. We cried for Mouse. But I, in no small part, cried for my parents as well.
I didn't know it then, but I could have found the answers I was looking for in their work as well. As an adult I would discover my father had enshrined every awful beat of my sister's last night into a single, searing poem called "Incanto."
Anne in her blue robe astonished, after two years, still,
at the last moment,
ASTONISHED.
My mother's work was less overt. Memoir was not Anne's passion. She adopted it as a form for the fictional accounts of her immortals, but she prided herself on transcending what she called the pedestrian details of experience. After I became a published author, she sometimes praised those aspects of my work in ways that came off as unintentionally conde-
scending. “I could never write a book about going to high school,” she once told me with a proud smile. I’m still not sure whether she was more pleased about my having done just that, or about her own determination to refuse.
If “Interview With the Vampire” bears any trace of my sister’s illness, with its nightmarish hospital stays, brutal treatments and financial devastation (my parents were so broke by the end, Michele was buried without a headstone), they have been transposed by metaphor into elements as gilded as they are bloody.
Except for one.
The idea that Michele was behind the child vampire Claudia seems bracingly obvious to anyone who reads the book with Anne's biography in mind. But the implication offended my mother for years.
Eventually, the scales fell from her eyes. Perspective allowed her to see what others had suggested: a beautiful golden-haired girl who can never physically age, and a psyche that undergoes the perpetual sophistication of immortality while trapped inside the infuriating confines of a child's body. If these are not intentionally a meta-
phor for Michele herself, they were at least crafted by a mother's grief, fueled by her desire to keep her daughter alive and growing even without a mature body in which to place her.
It's also apparent that my mother's loss blew open the wide expanse of her title character's centuries of perspective on the world: his crushing guilt, his rage at death, his sometimes crippling despair over the predatory cycles that define earthly existence. Louis de Pointe du Lac struggles with profound questions about the human condition after a vampire's bite converts him, condemning him to take life to survive. Anne too confronted rage and anguish and doubt after watching the most precious and vulnerable thing in her life waste away as she stood by helplessly — “astonished,” as my father wrote.
In 2021, my mother died of complications from a stroke at the age of 80. By then, she had published 37 novels and her success had turned her into a household name. The honor of caring for her estate passed to me and her dear friend Eric Shaw Quinn through our production company, Dinner Partners, which Anne helped us start. (She was the first guest on our first podcast episode.) Covid didn't take Anne, but pandemic restrictions prevented us from having a large public service. Still, her passionate fans wanted a collective way to mourn. Over the next four years, Eric and I worked tirelessly to produce a celebration that would blend theater and an anthology of original documentary films to tell her story.
But what was the story of Anne?
There were the obvious threads that countless journalists had followed before. That she transformed the vampire novel by writing from the vampire's perspective. That her portrait of two men attempting to raise a child together in a dark and hostile world that demands secrecy about their true nature was a groundbreaking representation of queerness. That the 1994 film adaptation of "Interview With the Vampire," for which Anne wrote the screenplay, remains a horror classic, a time capsule from a bygone era in which lavish studio films tackled dark, sophisticated themes and were rewarded for it at the box office.
We would include those, for sure. But were any of them really the story of Anne herself? Of course, we knew Michele's death would be the dark centerpiece. But Anne's fans weren't planning to travel to New Orleans and fill the Orpheum Theater because she'd lost a daughter. It was her response to that loss that would draw them from all over the world. Days before our event, as I struggled to find a central thesis for the speech I planned, it was Eric who offered one with simple clarity. "Your mother turned the worst thing that ever happened to her into the best thing that ever happened to her."
That was it. The dominant theme of Anne's life was not just her greatest loss, but how she endured it.
If the subsequent novels in the Vampire Chronicles tell the story of how Anne survived terrible loss, “Interview With the Vampire” gives us a story that captures the spiritual and psychological fundamentals of what she survived. Out of the agony of my sister’s death, she spun a world of love and rage, of family, blood and savage beauty, that had us all dancing until midnight in costumes ranging from the flowing silk to naked abandon, a feat only a remarkable few achieve during their lifetimes. □
Sebastian Barry's novel tours a post-Civil War America where cruelty is ever-present but love endures.

By IAN McGUIRE
"THE NEWER WORLD," the latest novel from the Irish writer Sebastian Barry, follows on from two of his earlier works, "Days Without End" (2016) and "A Thousand Moons" (2020). The protagonist, Tennyson Bouguereau, a Black man born into slavery in Tennessee around 1840, is a minor character in both books, and much of the first quarter of the new novel is taken up with brisk summaries of previously narrated events.
These catch-ups will be useful for those already familiar with the other volumes, but for new readers their necessary brevity will be confusing. For that reason, although “The Newer World” is certainly understandable as a stand-alone novel, it is probably best approached and appreciated as the third part of a trilogy.
Barry divides his story into three roughly equal sections. The first moves swiftly through Tennyson's childhood and,
THE NEWER WORLD
By Sebastian Barry
Viking. 259 pp. \$28.
after he and his sister, Rosalee, are freed, ends with the post-Civil War period in which Confederate sympathizers effectively retake control of western Tennessee.
In the second part, Tennyson, now fearing for his life, flees to Nashville, where he enters a newly established school for freedmen. Recognized for his musical talent, he joins the choir and develops an intense friendship with George, a fellow singer. He also falls in love with a woman named Minnie, who is headstrong and beautiful but not entirely trustworthy. Barry is excellent on the power of Black music to stir emotion and provoke empathy, and the scenes in which the choir performs before racist audiences are some of the strongest in the novel.
There is an abrupt and somewhat disconcerting shift in the final section, when George and Tennyson both leave the school, join the Army and then, in a direct echo of events described in “Days Without End,” are sent west to fight against the Apaches.
"The Newer World," "A Thousand Moons" and "Days Without End" are all set in the Southern and Western states in the years before, during and after the Civil War. As well as having many characters and scenes in common, they are linked thematically by their focus on the extreme prejudice, hatred and violence endured by Black people and Native Americans during this extraordinary period in the nation's history. When it comes to describing
IAN McGUIRE'S latest novel is "White River Crossing."
acts of racial violence, Barry rarely holds back, and a good deal of the trilogy's power comes from the stark lyricism with which he relates acts of enormous cruelty.
“Days Without End” contains lengthy and harrowing descriptions of the Army’s genocidal actions against the Yurok and Sioux, and the plot of “A Thousand Moons” centers on the violent rape of Winona Cole, a Lakota girl. In “The Newer World,” Tennyson’s parents are both murdered by white slave-owners, and he and his sister endure brutal assaults.
But the violence in these three novels, although important, is never the whole story. Just as central, and as persistent, is love. At the heart of “Days Without End” is the queer romance between the narrator, Thomas McNulty, a silver-tongued, cross-dressing Irish immigrant, and his quarter-Indian beau, John Cole. In “A Thousand
---
Moons" the youthful Winona finds comforts in the arms of Peg, a fellow orphan.
In both novels, Barry makes it clear that a form of deep familial love (however non-traditional that family may be) can balance out political and social brutality, making life bearable even for those who have suffered great trauma. This unusual conjunction of hair-raising violence and a slightly gushing emotionality is what gives the two earlier novels their undeniable originality and charm.
"The Newer World" seems ready on occasion, especially in its rather odd third movement, to repeat the comforting pattern established by its antecedents, but it is unable to do so satisfactorily. Whereas Thomas and Winona are passionate, wholehearted and utterly faithful to their lovers, Tennyson in his convoluted relations with George and Minnie is vacillating and uncertain. He seems unable to understand his own desires and is frequently at a loss to explain the decisions he has made or failed to make.
This would not be a problem if we felt that Barry fully understood and was able to communicate to the reader the reasons for his protagonist's confusion and self-doubt, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Instead, the puzzlement feels generalized and remains unresolved, which makes for a novel that strives to be more psychologically and emotionally complex than its precursors but ends up feeling significantly less sure-footed and coherent.
Fights, feuds and insults are all in a day's work for Ari Emanuel, who offers an unvarnished look at his career in a new memoir.
By ALEXANDRA JACOBS
FORGET THE "ODYSSEY." In his staccato, profane and vindictive new book, "Roll the Calls," Ari Emanuel invokes Homer's prequel, the "Iliad," whose first word is "rage." And "forget" is not the F-word he'd use.
Emanuel is a Hollywood superagent — that term now appropriated by A.I., the imminent industry crusher barely acknowledged in this book's pages. This is all A.R.I., baby.
He's represented people so famous they're one-named, like Oprah and the man formerly known as "the Donald," and became famous and one-named himself after "Entourage," the early-aughts HBO series featuring Ari Gold, the scenery-chewing-and-spewing character played by Jeremy Piven.
He's also youngest of the three high-achieving Emanuel brothers (Zeke, the doctor; Rahm, the politician); and his place in the birth order and relative struggles at school, Ari argues here, are what motivated him to become the richest.
“Third rail,” Emanuel tells a therapist nicknamed Dr. Calm, explaining how being treated as stupid sets off his notorious temper. “The only way I can describe it. Like an electric charge running through me. Zeerp! I lose all control.”
In recent years, showbiz bigwigs like Scott Rudin and Will Smith have been brought low after their own Zeerp! moments: furloughed from their careers and forced to apologize for their behavior.
Rage has an image problem. But move over, mindfulness; sayonara to stoicism: "Roll the Calls" wants to rebrand rage as potentially elevating, the way Gordon Gekko made greed good in "Wall Street."
“Rage might not solve every problem (or any problem), but it sure as hell clarifies the problem,” Emanuel writes, or dictates (nested in his acknowledgments is J.R. Moehringer, the A-list ghostwriter who worked with Prince Harry). “Rage brings things to a head.”
My editor has barred me from using any more cutesy portmanteaus, just as Emanuel was once barred from the studio lot at Disney, but I'm going to make like Ari and barrel forth anyway. This may be the world's first mad-moir. Or . . . mad-ifesto.
It's the story of how a kid with dyslexia and A.D.H.D. rose from licking envelopes for the very literary Robby Lantz, whose clients included James Baldwin and Carson McCullers; to the mailroom and upward at CAA; to cofounding the upstart agency Endeavor; to gobbling up William Morris and IMG. Notably, his jumbo bowl of alphabet soup, under the name TKO Group Holdings, now includes the fight giants U.F.C. and WWE.
ALEXANDRA JACOBS is a Times book critic and occasional features writer. She joined The Times in 2010.
A wrestler himself in high school after tussling in childhood with his brothers (“two violent psychopaths” — one of the few insults that seem like a joke), Ari has taken this opportunity to pin his opponents to the mat in print.
On Barry Diller, after a meeting about Live Nation: "The dude is just a mélange of old farts and bad ideas." And furthermore: "BORRRR-ing."
"That glad-handing phony" and "that [bleeping] putz" are the niceties leveled at Jeffrey Katzenberg.
ROLL THE CALLS
By Ari Emanuel
Knopf. 432 pp. \$35.
And to Irving Azoff, after Azoff tried to poach a client: "You are fundamentally a liar and selfish . . . You can lie to other people and think you'll get away with it. That's not happening with me. I'm not from this town. My roots are elsewhere and let me tell you something: I don't forget and won't forget. I keep grudges for a lifetime."
And this was a "side skirmish"!
Emanuel's roots are middle-class Chicago, but also Jerusalem, where his father, Benjamin, who became a pediatrician, was born after his forebears fled the pogroms in Ukraine. The family name was changed from Auerbach in honor of Benjamin's brother, Emanuel, who was killed by a stray bullet. Ari remembers wetting his pants during a prison attack in the West Bank when he was 7.
He was touring the prison because his mother, Marsha, was friends with the local police chief. She was a civil rights activist and tough cookie — Ari feels a kinship with Jackson Pollock upon hearing that the painter's mother was "volatile" and "withholding." She put his bad report cards on the refrigerator alongside those of his better-performing brothers. "She wasn't like other moms," he writes. "She cursed a lot."
Emanuel had an adopted younger sister with disabilities, Shoshana, but this book is primarily a Battle of the Gods in which we learn little of her, or his relationships with women. Those include a long first marriage to Sarah Hardwick Addington, with whom he has three sons and a daughter; and a second marriage to the much younger designer Sarah Staudinger, whom he refers to by the brand name of her clothing line, Staud.
"You fired me, Ari, and let me put this in a way you'll understand," Staud tells him when he wants her back after, incredibly, making Dr. Calm call her for a break. "If I let you rehire me, I want a promotion. And equity. Or else I quit."
Emanuel is a talker, not a reader; he gives Rahm the middle finger on a panel after he jokes Ari can't read anything over 200 pages. "Roll the Calls" is over 400, but goes fast, to Moehringer's credit, as if it were barked into a voice-memo app and transcribed by a quivering assistant. The iPhone has only accelerated Emanuel's roll. "I'll use my teleputer on you like a two-by-four," he asserts, using the word coined presciently by George Gilder in "Life After Television" (1990).
Oh, for 1990, when it was a flex merely to order off-menu at Spago!
The storied agent Sam Cohn devoured paper, who knows why. Bill Block popped raw garlic, we learn, to enhance his testosterone. Ari Emanuel? He ingests a daily cup of live worms to address what he calls (without irony) “inflammation,” recommending to an old antagonist, Mike Ovitz — how they’ve mellowed — that he do the same.
But these days Hollywood is less concerned with “hugging it out,” Gold’s signature catchphrase, than with Hugging Face. Will any of us eat lunch in this town again? □

The fashion designer Sarah Staudinger and talent agent Ari Emanuel in 2025.
A journalist charts the rise and fall of the Wall Street billionaire Leon Black, who gave millions to Jeffrey Epstein.
By JONATHAN MAHLER

Leon Black at the Museum of Modern Art in 2024.
THE FINANCIER Leon Black may be entitled to his own wall in the rogues' gallery of Jeffrey Epstein's enablers. Between 2012 and 2017, Black gave Epstein a staggering \$158 million — or more than \$170 million if you count a big loan that Epstein had not made good on when he hanged himself in his jail cell in 2019. Not only did the revelations of these payments put a premature end to Black's Wall Street career, they ensured that he would be remembered not as one of the great dealmakers of his time but as Epstein's most generous client.
In “Money to Burn,” the journalist William D. Cohen offers a detailed account of Black’s rise and fall. A former investment banker himself, Cohen is nothing if not thorough, and “Money to Burn” is a coup of reporting, based on extensive interviews with Black, his business partners and many others who are often quoted at great, and at times trying, length.
Cohan is telling two stories, really. One is about Black. The other is about the private equity firm he built, Apollo Global Management, which has been at the center of Wall Street's ongoing transformation from a place dominated by relatively staid banks and brokerage houses to a more shadowy realm ruled by “alternative asset managers” who raise and lend their own capital.
Black's arc makes for an almost perfect parable for the corrupting influence of money. His father, Eli, was settling into life as a Long Island rabbi when he pivoted in the mid-1940s. A career in finance, he reasoned without apparent irony, could be just as rewarding as one in the pulpit, as long as “men of virtue” were in charge.
Eli Black became enormously successful, the architect and chief executive of an international conglomerate called the United Brands Company. But his life ended tragically: In early 1975, with the company facing mounting financial problems and a bribery scandal, he leaped out the window of his 44th-floor office in Manhattan's Pan Am Building.
None of this ultimately deterred Leon from going into finance. Armed with a pair of Ivy League degrees (Dartmouth College, Harvard Business School), he started his career in 1977 at Drexel Burnham Lambert, the junk-bond powerhouse where men of virtue were in distinctly short supply.
When Drexel was forced into bankruptcy in 1990, following a protracted federal investigation into illegal trading, Black launched Apollo. He and his new team raised hundreds of millions of dollars to get started. Their plan was to leverage
JONATHAN MAHLER is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and the author, most recently, of "The Gods of New York: Egotists, Idealists, Opportunists, and the Birth of the Modern City: 1986-1990."
---
The Unvarnished Truth About Leon Black, Apollo, and the Rise of a New Wall Street By William D. Cohan
Portfolio. 667 pp. \$40.
this money to gain control of distressed companies and then have their way with them.
As Cohen makes clear, sucking profits out of struggling businesses was hard work that often entailed logic-defying feats of financial engineering and self-dealing. Needless to say, Black and his partners fared a lot better in these ventures than the employees or customers of the entities they bought. A series of sexual assaults at an Apollo-owned acute-care facility in Iowa helped prompt a Senate report, whose title — “Profits Over Patients: The Harmful Effects of Private Equity on the U.S. Health Care System” — speaks volumes and yet may still understate the matter.
Bargain hunting became not just a career but an avocation for the billionaires who ran Apollo. In 2011, Josh Harris, an Apollo co-founder and Black protégé, bought a big stake in an N.B.A. franchise, the down-on-their-luck Philadelphia 76ers. Another co-founder, Marc Rowan, set his sights on the Long Island surf town of Montauk, where, to the fury of many locals, he turned an affordable seafood shack into an upmarket one that, in 2019, served a \$54 lobster Cobb salad and \$795 bottles of rosé.
I guess everyone needs a hobby. Black's was art. In 2012, he spent nearly \$120 million for Edvard Munch's 1895 drawing of "The Scream." By then, Black had long been friendly with Epstein, whom he had met at a wedding in 1996. He would eventually fork over tens of millions of dollars to the convicted pedophile and registered sex offender.
Black spoke at length to Cohen about his interactions with Epstein, presumably believing that this book might help him clear his name. And Cohen gives Black plenty of room to mount his defense, however preposterous it may seem: Black claims that he paid Epstein these exorbitant sums — many multiples of what a first-rate Wall Street trusts-and-estates lawyer would charge, as Cohen notes — solely for his tax-and estate-planning advice.
Cohan seems skeptical, but neither does he fully endorse the alternative and seemingly far more credible explanation: that Epstein was less financial adviser than personal fixer for Black, helping him manage his illicit relationships with numerous women.
The news of Black's entanglement with Epstein first broke in 2019. Then, in March 2021, Guzel Ganieva, a young Russian woman to whom Black had paid millions of dollars in hush money, wrote on Twitter that she'd been sexually abused by him.
Days later, Black stepped down from Apollo, naming Rowan — not Harris, who had long aspired to succeed him — as chief executive. A few months after that, Black filed a RICO suit against Harris and Ganieva, accusing them of conspiring to make her sexual-abuse claims public in an effort to push him out. Black's complaint compares Harris to "Shakespeare's lago," alleging that once Harris knew he was being passed over for the big job at Apollo, he turned his wrath on his former mentor.
“It’s hard to imagine that that’s where we’re at,” a befuddled Harris told Cohan about Black’s charges. Indeed, reading Black’s unhinged theories about Harris, a different Shakespeare character comes to mind: King Lear. The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in Manhattan in 2022. A year later, though, Black prevailed in a civil suit that Ganieva had filed against him, accusing him of defamation and sexual assault.
In laying out this sordid saga, Cohan offers a lot of conflicting claims. It's my one real gripe with this book: Cohan is so focused on allowing his subjects to have their say — and, perhaps, on making the most of his considerable access — that he delegates too much of the storytelling to them rather than forcefully shaping the narrative himself.
Last March, a few of my colleagues at The New York Times made a convincing case that Epstein's services included helping Black obscure millions of dollars that he paid to a dozen women, at least some of whom he had sexual encounters with, a report that Black denied. For whatever reason, in "Money to Burn," Cohan doesn't reach his own conclusion about the mystery at the heart of Black's story: What, exactly, was he paying Epstein for? The resulting picture of Black's relationship with Epstein — and, in turn, of Black himself — is blurry.
Setting this issue aside, “Money to Burn” is an engaging and valuable work, a portrait of a man and a milieu whose inexhaustible devotion to the accumulation of personal wealth may test your faith in capitalism. What’s more, if Black’s hope was that Cohan would help redeem his character, he may be disappointed with the final product, which closely chronicles his tawdry descent into infamy.
And yet the joke may be on us. Since Black's departure, Apollo has moved more aggressively into the private-credit markets, exploiting its advantage over banks and brokerage houses, whose debt loads and lending practices are much more heavily regulated. Business is booming. By 2029, Apollo aims to have \$1.5 trillion in assets under management — more than the G.D.P. of Indonesia. Black has been thoroughly disgraced in the court of public opinion, but he is still Apollo's largest individual shareholder. With an estimated personal fortune of around \$15 billion, he is surely richer than ever.
A reporter draws together a bushel of figures who thrived in one fateful decade.

President Trump in the Oval Office in July.
By RICK PERLSTEIN
SOME SAY Leo Tolstoy's “War and Peace,” with its scores of plots and subplots carried out by hundreds of named characters, is not a proper novel at all. Instead, all that fine-grained narrative specificity is grist for the book’s essayistic critiques of what actually concerns the author: the way historians reduce history to over-tidy categories that explain how things turned out. “Any conclusion of historical science, without the least effort on the part of criticism, falls apart like dust, leaving nothing be-
WHEN AMERICA ROARED
How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today
By Jonathan Kaufman
Viking. 294 pp. \$35.
hind," he insisted, because "any chosen historical unit is always arbitrary" — including what we call a historical "period."
Tolstoy would especially despise the way many history books, in our own time, isolate a single decade or a single year to “explain how we live now.” Were we able to place before the master a book called “1969: The Year Everything Changed,” then one called “1968: The Year That Rocked the World,” then “1967: The Year of Fire and Ice,” then “1966: The Year the Decade Exploded,” then “The Last Innocent Year: America in 1964,” he would point out what we all should see: If every year can be said to have been the most important, then none of them were. (He might also say 1965 needs a better literary agent.)
The problem is the same with “decade” books. And yet they proliferate, perhaps because, in a time when profit margins are tight in the literary world and the corporations that own publishing imprints demand predictable returns, decade-bound tomes are easier to sell than more nuanced stuff.
Jonathan Kaufman's “When America Roared: How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today” is hardly the worst of the genre. The organizing idea is sound: The embrace of market dynamism during the years of Ronald Reagan's presidency broke through the stagnation and alienation of the years that immediately preceded it, but led in turn to inequality and alienation and populist discontent of our own time.
Kaufman assembles his narrative out of the interlocking stories of several figures he finds exemplary, including G.E.'s superstar C.E.O. Jack Welch, who fought against labor organizing; the Black investor John Rogers, whose rise in 1980s Chicago, Kauf-
RICK PERLSTEIN is the author of several books, including "Reaganland: America's Right Turn 1976-1980."
man argues, paved the way for Barack Obama; the former anti-Vietnam War activist Karen Nussbaum, whose spectacular success organizing secretaries into a union called 9to5 inspired the hit 1980 film of the same name; and Evan Wolfson, the Yale grad who navigated between the Scylla of conservative resistance and the Charybdis of ultraleft movement radicals to turn gay marriage into a legally imaginable goal. There are useful insights along the way, though none are mind-blowing, and some are banal; and some are incorrect.
It is always interesting to review the saga of Welch, a working-class child of a postwar prosperity built on strong unions, community-minded corporations and activist government who proceeded proudly and ruthlessly to decimate all of that and thus ruin the future prospects of the generations of working-class children who came
---
after him.
Nussbaum serves as Welch's main narrative foil. Her efforts in the 1970s turning harried victims of an office world that resembled “Mad Men” into a political force soon hit the same wall all late-20th-century union organizers hit, in the midst of the “unprecedented assault on unions” that Kaufman says began in 1981, shortly after Reagan moved into the White House.
The problem with this formulation is that the assault was anything but unprecedented (before the 1940s, labor agitators were frequently shot); and its pieces were well in place by the end of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, whom the historian and New Deal partisan Arthur Schlesinger found so neglectful of labor that he said Carter was, actually, “not a Democrat — at least in anything more recent than the Grover Cleveland sense of the word”: a good example of how the “decade that changed everything” frame obscures more than it enlightens.
Kaufman's freshest and most interesting contribution is his portrait of Mark Fowler, Reagan's first chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. It's fascinating to learn, from Kaufman's interviews with him, that Fowler's passion for obliterating regulation of TV and radio broadcasts, which he considered a world-altering intervention in the history of liberty, was borne out of an irritation with having to fill out logbooks to document what songs and public-service announcements he played, in his college days as a rock D.J.
It is frustrating, however, to see how much Kaufman gets wrong about one of the important consequences of this deregulation: the rise of right-wing shock jocks like Rush Limbaugh. This telling imputes their success not to politics but to a simplistic class resentment: Limbaugh's listeners were, Kaufman contends, "overwhelmingly middle- and lower-class white men" left behind once newspapers and public radio "abandoned them" for more affluent audiences. This is incorrect, as a matter of both sociology and intent; Limbaugh himself, in 1991, boasted that he prioritized callers with car phones, because they must be rich.
"When America Roared" is best once Kaufman abandons the market-forged manacles of the "decade" conceit and turns to his own life story. As a young journalist in the late 1980s, he was The Boston Globe's second reporter on the scene after the massacre in Tiananmen Square, where activists had littered Beijing streets with broken bottles to taunt the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, whose name sounds like the Mandarin words for "little bottle." Then he was sent to the crumbling Eastern bloc, where during the final protests against Communist rule he heard rumors that Leipzig hospitals had been stocking up on blood, fearing a Tiananmen Square-style crackdown.
Tolstoy's favorite metaphors for historical change involved oceans. “Though the surface of the historical sea seemed immobile, mankind moved as ceaselessly as the movement of time,” he wrote in “War and Peace.” You can describe the fascinating things that float on the surface, but grasping the underlying, invisible currents that brought them there, over a year or a decade, before they sink below the froth to contribute to future tidal shifts, is a task for masters. Some can do it — Christian Caryl in “Strange Rebels: 1979 and the Birth of the 21st Century” is my particular favorite — but Kaufman doesn't quite pull it off here. A memoir about his stint as a young reporter as Communism was falling apart, though: That's a book I'd want to read.

In three new picture books, young offspring taste independence from messy, ‘sticky’ and nurturing family bonds.

---
FAMILIES: Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. And who, besides long-term analysands, knows that better than kids tasting independence by pushing against those messy, sticky and — best-case scenario — nurturing bonds? It's a theme that underscores shelves and shelves' worth of classic children's literature.
Three terrific new books — each a marvel of imagination, sensitivity and craft — take up the baton. All contain art so thematically and visually audacious that, if I didn't quite gasp when I first turned the pages, I mouthed a silent “whoa.” Or laughed out of sheer delight.
Among the trio, Christian Robinson's "Dad" addresses the youngest audience. Robinson is one of the 21st century's foremost picture-book makers, illustrating his own stories as well as others' — notably Matt de la Peña's "Last Stop on Market Street," for which Robinson was a Caldecott honoree (and de la Peña won a Newbery Medal). His new book's text and premise are simple: Short sentences detailing fatherly attributes are juxtaposed with illustrations of animal dads (and a few human ones) rendered in his trademark mix of collage and paint.
For “Dad is strong,” Robinson offers a wary-looking gorilla, his body as heavy and graceful as a Henry Moore sculpture, standing guard over his child. You can feel
BRUCE HANDY is the author, most recently, of "Hollywood High," a history of teen movies, and "Balloon," a picture book illustrated by Julie Kwon.

the strength in the ape's massive forearms, and the love in the sheltering curves of his back and shoulders.
"Dad holds on tight" depicts a papa sea-horse with a baby in his pouch, his tail clutching a strand of seaweed. The ocean
DAD
By Christian Robinson
Balzer + Bray. 48 pp. \$19.99.
(Ages 3 to 6)
THE MUÉGANOS
By Jaque Jours
Transit Children's Editions. 48 pp. \$20.95.
(Ages 3 and up)
NOBODY BUT ME
By Sara Lundberg
Translated by B.J. Woodstein
Triangle Square. 64 pp. \$21.95.
(Ages 4 to 7)
depths are ebony black, so we can only sense the threat of a strong current in the bending seaweed and the protective tension in the silvery seahorse's spiny body. It's a sublime composition.
Though “Dad” leans more into attachment than testing family bonds, Robinson wisely acknowledges that fathers may have shortcomings. “Dad needs lots of space.” (Illustration: a toothy, grimacing shark.) “Dad lets you down.” (A carefree gibbon ignoring his charge.)
“Dad had to go away” depicts two owlets left behind in their nest. Behind them, a jagged opening to the sky feels like a wound. In a letter included with reviewers' copies, Robinson writes that his own father “wasn’t around growing up, and I am not yet a dad myself.” For me, that bit of back story makes a remarkable book even more remarkable.
Did I mention messy, sticky bonds? The debut author-illustrator Jaque Jours makes them literal in “The Muéganos,” a wonderfully droll book about a rabbit family named for a “traditional Mexican candy made of small, square pieces of fried wheat dough, stuck together with honey or pilon-cillo syrup.” (Jewish readers may be reminded of teiglach.)
As portrayed in Jours's mixed-media art, the five Muéganos — Papá, Mamá and three children, including Julia, our protagonist — are joined together at the shoulders, the bunnies' feet dangling amusingly in the air. "They are never apart," she writes. "Papá Muégano says honey glues them together. Mamá says it's love. Julia thinks it is a little boring."
And there, fiction workshoppers and child-psychology students, is your primal conflict!
One day, while visiting a museum, Julia's "simple urge" to wander off by herself and see what she wants to see is so strong that it makes "something crack." Jours depicts the family starting to splinter and then, with the page turn, a stunning image: a tiny but big-eyed Julia alone in a black void that also suggests a torn page. Is she exhilarated, terrified or merely startled? Probably all three.
Back home, the family tries to repair the breach, but “some things are just inevitable,” a truth Jours illustrates with broken Delft-style crockery. Her ending is a happy one, though. Genuinely loving families learn to allow breathing room.
Sara Lundberg's "Nobody but Me," translated by B.J. Woodstein, is a masterpiece with a wordless middle section that defies easy summary.
One summer day a little boy visits a lake with his mom. Itching to do something by himself, he unties a small inflatable raft and drifts off — in the literal sense but also,
---
maybe, in the sleepy sense. Gentle (at first) waters carry him on a dreamlike journey through an enveloping forest and then into the wider world, where, among other things, he finds love (or at least friendship) and danger.
But don't worry: A trio of forest children in leaf skirts — sprites, perhaps — serve as guardians and keep trouble from getting out of hand. Changed but unchanged, the boy drifts back to his mom clutching a seed, which he plants when they return home. It too will grow.
Lundberg, a beloved and well-honored Swedish picture-book maker, works here in a vivid, liquid, painterly style that reminds me of David Hockney's late-period landscapes; you want to dive in.
“Nobody but Me” won’t be for every kid, or adult, but it will touch something in many, even if they don’t yet know what that something is. □
Above, Christian Robinson's art from "Dad." Below, art by Jaque Jours from "The Muéganos" (left) and Sara Lundberg from "Nobody but Me."
---
---

---
Kuang, a successful fantasy writer, once again explores the link between language and empire in this realistic novel about an American student adrift in Taiwan. By homing in on everyday dramas of midterms and sisters and sex, she shows she's as skilled at literary fiction as she is at its speculative cousin; if you didn't know better it would be hard to imagine her writing in any other register.

---
In this rich study of the Blow plantation in Virginia — not far from the site of Nat Turner's 1831 uprising — the Pulitzer-winning historian Taylor endeavors to separate tradition from the truth, attending carefully to the mix of high-minded sympathy and chilling cruelty that churned inside American slave owners. The result is like a nonfiction version of William Faulkner's "Absalom, Absalom!"

SWITZY, by Emma Cline. (Random House. 352 pp. \$32.)
Cline's new novel gets inside the head of a stoic businessman with dementia, who is flying to Switzerland to end his life — but not before confronting the boarding-school roommate who has held an outsize place in his psyche. A Booker nominee, and a significant swerve from Cline's female- and youth-centric earlier fiction, "Switzy" does so much so very well; Cline collates beautifully the absurd detritus of modernity.
---
---

---
Choose from a variety of gift subscriptions — there's one to suit nearly everyone.
Visit nytimes.com/gift or call 855-698-5273.

---

SHADOW TICKET, by Thomas Pynchon. (Penguin Books. 304 pp. \$20.)
In Depression-era Wisconsin, Hicks McTaggart, a reluctant private eye, is tasked with what appears to be a straightforward
assignment: to find and return a wandering cheese heiress. The job takes him to Eastern Europe, where he becomes entangled in a world of swing dancers, motorcycle outlaws, Soviet agents and Nazis rendered with classic Pynchonian excess.

TOWER OF BASEL: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank That Runs the World, by Adam LeBor. (Public-Affairs. 416 pp. \$22.99.)
The Bank of International Settlements, a "bank for central banks," as LeBor calls it, is a little-known but crucial
institution at the center of the world's economy. His account, first published in 2013, chronicles the bank's checkered past — it was a vital supporter of the Nazi regime during World War II — to shed light on the political and moral ramifications of global finance.

THE WILDERNESS, by Angela Flournoy. (Mariner. 304 pp. \$18.99.)
Narrated in shifting perspectives, Flournoy's novel traces the lives of four friends — Desiree, January, Monique and Nakia — over two decades
beginning in 2008, as they grapple with the demands of adulthood, friendship and an increasingly volatile 21st century. Our reviewer, Niela Orr, called it a book that attests to “the ways a person’s mind can become a haunted house, its private ghosts compounding with time.” | THIS WEEK | LAST WEEK | Paperback Trade Fiction | WEEKS ON LIST | 1 | 1 | THEO OF GOLDEN, by Allen Levi. (Atria) A man travels to a small Southern town, where he purchases pencil drawings of local residents and exchanges them for stories. | 43 | 2 | GRIM TIDINGS, by B. K. Borison. (Avon) The second book in the Ghosted series. A Grim Reaper looking to not do harm forms an unexpected alliance with a Guardian Angel. | 1 | 3 | 2 | DUNGEON CRAWLER CARL, by Matt Dinniman. (Ace) A Coast Guard vet named Carl and his ex-girlfriend's cat, Princess Donut, are trapped in a fantasy dungeon. | 38 | 4 | 3 | VERITY, by Colleen Hoover. (Grand Central) Lowen Ashleigh is hired by the husband of an injured writer and uncovers a horrifying truth; the basis of the movie. | 162 | 5 | 4 | BRAIN DAMAGE, by Freida McFadden. (Poisoned Pen) A dermatologist who took a bullet through her skull tries to piece together her memories and determine if someone close to her is a threat. | 5 | 6 | THE WOMEN, by Kristin Hannah. (St. Martin's Griffin) A nurse follows her brother to serve during the Vietnam War and returns to a divided America. | 1 | 7 | 6 | PROJECT HAIL MARY, by Andy Weir. (Ballantine) The fate of humanity rests on Ryland Grace's shoulders; the basis of the movie. | 65 | 8 | SHIELD OF SPARROWS, by Devney Perry. (Red Tower) A princess deals with various adversaries as she moves into the role she chooses for herself, not the one chosen for her. | 1 | 9 | 8 | CARL'S DOOMSDAY SCENARIO, by Matt Dinniman. (Ace) The second book in the "Dungeon Crawler Carl" series. | 7 | 10 | 7 | WILD DARK SHORE, by Charlotte McConaghy. (Flatiron) A woman washes ashore on a tiny island near Antarctica, where the only inhabitants are a man and his three children. | 3 | 11 | 10 | THE LOVE HYPOTHESIS, by Ali Hazelwood. (Berkley) A young professor agrees to pretend to be a third-year Ph.D. candidate's boyfriend. | 45 | 12 | 12 | RED RISING, by Pierce Brown. (Del Rey) A member of the lowest rung of a society on Mars in the future mixes in with humanity's overlords in the hopes of taking them down. | 14 | 13 | 9 | MY DREADFUL DARLING, by H. D. Carlton. (ZPN) Reverie Adams attempts to put her dark past behind her but Dreadful Sharpe's desire for revenge brings it back. | 3 | 14 | 13 | A COURT OF THORNS AND ROSES, by Sarah J. Maas. (Bloomsbury) Feyre is taken from her home and placed inside the world of the Fae. | 88 | 15 | 14 | THE DIVORCE, by Freida McFadden. (Poisoned Pen) After her husband ends their marriage, Naomi suspects she might be in danger. | 16 | Sales are defined as completed transactions between vendors and individual end users during the period on or after the official publication date of a title. Sales of titles are statistically weighted to represent and accurately reflect all outlets proportionally nationwide. The panel of reporting retailers is comprehensive and reflects sales in tens of thousands of stores of all sizes and demographics across the United States. ONLINE: For a full explanation of our methodology, visit www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers.
---
Make busy mornings less of a scramble.

Explore recipe collections like Breakfast in 10 Minutes or Less.
nytcooking.com
Reporting on climate from every continent.
The New York Times

Oh, Canada! In "True North," the veteran travel writer Paul Theroux crisscrosses the country of his forebears for insights about how it differs from his own. BY JENNIFER SZALAI | PAGE 9
---


The New York Times
OCTOBER 4, 2026

---
6 Fantasy
Reviewed by Jennifer Harlan
8 EXIT PARTY
By Emily St. John Mandel
Reviewed by Lincoln Michel
11 THE BREAKUP
By Kurt Andersen
Reviewed by Jonathan Dee
14 THE NEWER WORLD
By Sebastian Barry
Reviewed by Ian McGuire
---
7 GONZO NEUROTIC
The Best (and Not So Best) of Jerry Stahl
By Jerry Stahl
CORNER BOY
Loiterings New and Old
By Nik Cohn
Reviewed by Dwight Garner
9 TRUE NORTH
On the Road in Canada
By Paul Theroux
Reviewed by Jennifer Szalai
10 REDWOOD The Untold Story of the Cold War's Most Extraordinary Spy By Ben Macintyre Reviewed by Joseph Finder
15 ROLL THE CALLS
A Memoir
By Ari Emanuel
Reviewed by Alexandra Jacobs
16 MONEY TO BURN
The Unvarnished Truth About Leon Black, Apollo, and the Rise of a New Wall Street
By William D. Cohan
Reviewed by Jonathan Mahler
17 WHEN AMERICA ROARED
How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today
By Jonathan Kaufman
Reviewed by Rick Perlstein
---
18 DAD By Christian Robinson
THE MUÉGANOS
By Jaque Jours
NOBODY BUT ME
By Sara Lundberg
Reviewed by Bruce Handy
---
5 By the Book
Katt Williams
12 Essay
"Interview With the Vampire" at 50
By Christopher Rice
22 Appraisal
Wendell Berry
By Barbara Kingsolver
23 Read Like the Wind Lessons in World-Building By John Maher
Etc.
4 Letters
19 Best-Seller Lists
19 Editors' Choice
20 Paperback Row
Cover illustration by Nada Hayek


Prepare today's college students to become tomorrow's global citizens.
Get campuswide access to The New York Times. Learn more at nytimes.com/campuswide

The New York Times
50
hours baking with stand mixers
24 batches of cookies
10 hours whipping cream by hand
Learn more at nytimes.com/hellowirecutter

The New York Times
Wirecutter
One easy way
to sweeten
your kitchen

The New York Times
Make prep time the new playtime.
Cooking

Explore recipe collections like Recipes to Cook With Your Kids.
nytcooking.com
Letters

Read It and Weep
TO THE EDITOR:
Regarding Erik Piepenburg's essay "How DNF Became A-OK" (Sept. 13): On the question of whether one has to finish a book once one has started it, Samuel Johnson had a characteristically robust view. "This is surely a strange advice," he pronounced. "You may as well resolve that whatever men you happen to get acquainted with, you are to keep to them for life." But to discover this you need to get to almost the very end of James Boswell's "The Life of Samuel Johnson" — Page 934 in the Penguin Classics edition. I can't help suspecting that Boswell was having a joke at the reader's expense.
ADRIAN JOHNS CHICAGO
---
TO THE EDITOR:
I would only add that if you really don't like that book, don't just put it on the DNF shelf. Rip it up — with gusto!
JUDITH JACKSON
IRASBURG, VT.
Moving Mountains
TO THE EDITOR:
W.M. Akers's review of "The Everest Mystery," by Julie Summers and Jochen Hemmleb (Sept. 6), adds to the growing fascination with George Mallory's early attempts to reach the summit of Everest.
Readers might also like to know about an acclaimed 2011 book by Wade Davis, "Into the Silence: The Great War, Mal-
lory, and the Conquest of Everest." It features the Canadian surveyor Oliver Wheeler, another overlooked and important character who figured out the route to the North Col, the main gateway to Everest's summit for Mallory, and created the first map of Everest. (Wheeler also introduced photo-topographical mapping techniques to the Himalayas.)
Davis looks at how Mallory's English upper-class upbringing influenced his treatment of Wheeler, who was from a former British colony. “Wheeler’s Everest,” a stunning documentary, is based on Davis's book and counts on the author's participation along with that of Wheeler's great-grandson Jeff.
HEATHER MACANDREW
VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA
Off Base
TO THE EDITOR:
Dwight Garner, in his review of “The Disappearers,” by Marlon James (Sept. 13), claims that “James is casually funny in a way Faulkner rarely is.” I’ve often found Faulkner “casually funny” even in his most tragic novels. One of my favorite moments comes in “The Sound and the Fury” when a paranoid Jason Compson, asked if he has his money on the Yankees after their Murderers’ Row season in 1927, says he’d never bet on any team with “that fellow Ruth” on it. That’s the same Ruth who hit a record-breaking 60 home runs in 1927.
RICHARD PETERSON
MAKANDA, ILL.
BOOKS@NYTIMES.COM


'Reading wasn't a hobby. It was my first hustle,' the comedian writes in 'Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines,' his new memoir, which also explains why he ran into trouble with Dr. Seuss.
---
By subject matter. I like knowing where to go when I'm looking for something specific. I've always looked at books as resources, not decoration. So the shelves have to make sense to me.
---
Most people probably don't know that I'm a gardener or how much I genuinely enjoy it, so they might be surprised by how many gardening books I have. There's something about growing things that teaches you patience. You have to understand what something needs, give it the right environment, and then let it become what it's supposed to become. I think there's a lesson in that.
---
As a kid, there were a lot of things I didn't have access to, but I had access to books. So if there was something I wanted to understand, I could go find a book about it. History, religion, business, science, people. I could teach myself. That's why I call it my first hustle. A hustle is figuring out how to use what you have to get what you need. What I had was the ability to read, the curiosity to keep going and enough sense to understand that knowing something other people didn't know could be an advantage.
---
"The Swiss Family Robinson" changed my life. There was something about the adventure, the ingenuity, this family having to figure out how to survive and create a whole world with what they had. "The Diary of Anne Frank" was another one. I was young, but I understood that I was reading the words of somebody who had actually lived this. That made it different.
And then there was Stephen King. At some point I had to admit: I respect how good you are, Mr. King, but I also enjoy sleeping.
---
If you've read seven or eight hundred autobiographies of other people, you assume that at some point you have to add your name to that conversation. And as incredible as a hundred million views may be, that work still belongs to the internet. We haven't had the internet for thousands of years. Books, we have. There's something different about putting your story in a form that can sit on a shelf, get passed from one person to another, and still be there long after whatever platform is popular today is gone.
---
By going around calling myself Katt in the Hat and making money doing it. Apparently, that will get you a cease-and-desist. I was just a young comedian trying to build a name for myself. I wasn't thinking about trademarks or intellectual property. I was thinking, "Katt in the Hat — that's funny." They were thinking something entirely different.
---
No, I was allowed to read pretty much anything I wanted. There was even a period in my life when all I wanted was to find the list of forbidden books so I could read every one. Because if you tell me a book is forbidden, now I need to know why. What kind of information could be so volatile that somebody decided I shouldn't have access to it?
---
The Torah. Everything. It reminded me that I don't think you can really read a book and not walk away with something.
---
J.R.R. Tolkien, Mark Twain and Jack London. Tolkien because I'd want to understand how somebody builds an entire world in their mind with that much detail and then convinces everybody else that it exists. Mark Twain because he understood how to use humor to tell the truth about society. Jack London because there was something fearless about his writing and his life. Put them at the table and I'm not even sure I'd say that much. I'd just want to see what they argued about.
BIG-TIME OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL-PRESS PUBLISHERS
Independent publishers and authors of not-so-independent means receive special discounted advertising rates every Sunday in The New York Times Book Review.
For more information, please contact Kayla Chowdhury at kayla.chowdhury@nytimes.com
Reach an influential audience for less.
The New York Times
Book Review
nytimes.com/bookreview
We take the government to court year after year to make sure it can't hide information from taxpayers on topics like health, safety and education.
The New York Times
WORDLE, CONNECTIONS, SPELLING BEE, MINIS AND MORE!
Wordle, Connections,
Spelling Bee, Minis and more
The New York Times Games

EDITED BY JOEL FAGLIANO
200+ puzzles and games. Get Puzzle Mania! Today!
Available wherever books are sold.

puzzlemaniabook.com

New books from Lex Croucher, Mollyhall Seeley and Elizabeth DeLozier will whisk you away to magical new places.
READING THE UNMAGICAL LIFE OF BRIAR JONES (Harper Voyager, 447 pp., \$32) — the adult debut by Croucher, who has written several charming young adult novels — I completely lost my grip on time. I was so engrossed in the book, so immersed in the author's imagination, I forgot to eat dinner. When I finally emerged, I was exhausted, starving, a bit teary-eyed and totally exhilarated.
The novel follows Briar and Sebastian, inseparable childhood best friends who dreamed of attending the Temple School of Thaumaturgy — an upper-crust English institution whose curriculum is rumored to include sorcery — together. When the friends were 11, Seb was admitted to Temple, but Briar (who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns) was not, leaving Briar utterly crushed.
When the book picks up, it's seven years later, and Briar and Seb haven't spoken since. Then Briar takes a temp job at Temple. When they arrive, their hopes of magic's existence are realized — but they also discover that sensitive Seb has transformed into the
JENNIFER HARLAN is an editor, and the fantasy columnist, at the Book Review.
most powerful member of a gang of evil upperclassmen. Briar quickly finds their own group: the posh nerd Westby, dandy Tate and firecracker Hadley, who form a queer-friendly bubble within the traditionalist school. Something, Briar learns, is very rotten at the heart of Temple, and the four-some is determined to dismantle it.
Croucher is a deliciously witty writer, with a knack for seamless pop culture references, and is especially effective at writing about the camaraderie that blooms when you and your companions are running for your lives. Briar's story — part action adventure, part tender second-chance romance — is a moving meditation on friendship and trust, class and power, the terrible choices that do not have to define us. It's my favorite fantasy novel I've read all year. I would happily skip more meals to hang out with this gang again.
SEELEY TAKES A spikier approach to friendship in her debut novel, WE HEXED THE MOON (Saga Press, 215 pp., paperback, \$18). Jen, Goldie, Maycie and Harding are four best friends caught, in the summer of 2014, in that liminal space between senior year of high school and the rest of their lives. Like so many bored teenage girls before them, they decide to fill one of their waning days together with a ritual — complete with candles, blood offerings and an incantation courtesy of Tumblr — to summon the moon.
Unfortunately for them, the spell works. The moon vanishes from the sky, shows up in corporeal form in Jen's bedroom and refuses to return to her thankless perch, where nobody even sacrifices virgins to her anymore. The girls have 10 hours to find her replacement, she says, or the world as they know it will end.
The novel is written in the breathless rush of adolescence — a white-hot folie à quatre fueled by nostalgia and milkshakes. Things get messy (and I'm not just talking about the plotting, which I do wish had been tauter, especially given the book's brevity). But then, that's how these friendships go sometimes: burning impossibly bright and flaming out like a supernova.
"They'd never, never be as real," Goldie thinks, "never as fully alive as it was possible to be in Maycie's falling-down old house in a bed with your three best friends, still young, still hungry, still flayed alive on the altar of being a girl."
MUCH IS MADE of the symbiosis between fantasy and romance, but I would like to put in a plug for that other intoxicating hybrid: the fantasy mystery, which infuses the hairpin pleasures of a whodunit with a bit of magic. In THE WHITECHAPEL FULL MOON SOCIETY (Dutton, 354 pp., paperback, \$20), the thrills come from the hunt for the infamous Jack the Ripper. And you can probably guess, from the lycanthropic title, where the paranormal comes in.
Our heroine, Caroline, is the recently orphaned daughter of a debt-strapped nobleman. Forced to sell her family estate, she sets off for London hoping to find her beloved older brother, Charlie, who has stopped answering her letters.
The city is smog-choked and simmering with hysteria over a recent spate of murders. It's also seductive — especially for a novel-obsessed girl who has long dreamed of seeing the world beyond her manor. When Caroline arrives at Charlie's boarding-house, the titular Whitechapel Full Moon Society, he's not there. But there's something fishy about the way the landlady and boarders — especially Rab, Charlie's chemist best friend — dodge her questions. So Caroline gives them a fake last name and takes a job as the house's maid, determined to excavate their secrets.
Caroline is not the most competent sleuth, but DeLozier paints her and the other Whitechapel residents with such warmth I forgave her fumbling, even when it gummed up the mystery. The author also brings great humanity to the Ripper's victims, marrying supernatural terrors to the very real ones faced by women (especially single, economically vulnerable ones) — a story that tragically continues today.
Two career-spanning essay collections, from Nik Cohn and Jerry Stahl, revel in life's margins and recapture auras past.
By DWIGHT GARNER
"FIRST OF ALL," Michael Kinsley wrote in the preface to one of the collections of his columns, "I don't want any grief about throwing together a bunch of old articles and calling it a book." He liked this sort of volume (so do I) because they're a "way to recapture the flavor of the recent past."
Two longtime freelance scene-makers, Nik Cohn and Jerry Stahl, have new collections out soon. They're dissimilar writers in many ways, but read together, the commonalities really begin to pile up.
CORNER BOY
Loiterings New and Old
By Nik Cohn
ZE Books. 372 pp. \$35.
GONZO NEUROTIC
The Best (and Not-So-Best) of Jerry Stahl
By Jerry Stahl
ZE Books. 444 pp. \$24.
Neither is a mainstream type (their work doesn't go well with the furniture) and each practices a form of journalism that might be called loitering with intent. Each was born in the middle of the last century (Cohn in 1946, Stahl in 1953) and each wrote for a slew of music magazines, alt-weeklies, and slick and lowlife outlets that aren't around any longer. Each has admitted smuggling fiction into what appeared to be fact pieces.
Each was a drug addict, though only Stahl made a career out of it. His junkie memoir, “Permanent Midnight,” from 1995, was turned into a film with Ben Stiller. Each is Jewish. Each wrote more books than most people are aware of.
Each wants to semi-disown his most popular work. In Cohn's case, that's "Tribal Rites of a New Saturday Night," a 1976 New York magazine article about the disco and club scenes in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, that inspired the movie "Saturday Night Fever." He later admitted he'd made most of it up, and seemed surprised people hadn't known all along. In Stahl's case, he made a killing writing for "ALF," the late-1980s NBC sitcom about a furry alien.
Each took an interest in unknown and marginal souls and wrote profiles of people like boxers, preachers, night court defense lawyers, barbers and exuberant peddlers of bedspreads. Each speaks about having a heavy freight of impostor syndrome.
Each of their new, career-spanning collections — which include essays, reviews, profiles, think pieces and random blurts — is issued by ZE Books, the iconoclastic independent publishing house. Cohn's is called "Corner Boy." Stahl's is "Gonzo Neurotic."
I'm going to begin with "Corner Boy," be-
DWIGHT GARNER has been a book critic for The Times since 2008, and before that was an editor at the Book Review for a decade.

Nik Cohn
cause Cohn's stuff is more to my taste. He's cool to the touch, for the most part, while Stahl has an over-the-top, Hunter S. Thompson meets Anthony Bourdain meets Cosmo Kramer (he's always bumping into the things he's writing about) shtick, a maniacal style I dug when I was 17 but now mostly clangs on my ears.
Cohn grew up amid the rubble of post-World War II London and was in the exact demographic place to feel the detonation of Elvis Presley, the Beatles, the Rolling Stones and the Who across a formerly dull, gray landscape. He was a pioneering rock critic, the author of “Awopbopalooob Alopbamboom” (1970), a landmark early history of rock.
His music writing was ardent, fond and knowing, and it had bite. He mostly loathed Bob Dylan (“the whining dentist’s drill in his voice”). While the Stones were his favorite band — he wrote about them as crude, mean, vital liberators — he thought they’d gone soft and posh by the late 1960s. He infuriated Mick Jagger by writing that a) he’d gradually lose his hair and b) the band wasn’t meant to get old. “If they have any sense of neatness,” Cohn wrote, “they’ll get themselves killed in an air crash, three days before their 30th birthdays.”
There are profiles of Phil Spector, Grace Jones and Gary Stewart, the honky-tonk renegade who's back on the radar thanks to Jimmy McDonough's recent biography. But Cohn was more interested, ultimately, in trends and scenes, in what was happening on the streets. He wrote a book — “The Heart of the World” (1992) — about walking up Broadway, from Battery Park to
Times Square, and about those he met along the way.
This collection's best piece might be one about Teddy Boys, the truculent, middle-finger-giving subculture that sprang up in London after the war. The Teds, as they were often known, wore Edwardian-style jackets, drainpipe trousers, slim-jim ties and combed their greased hair into pompadours. They mattered, Cohn writes, because England's teens had previously been so bland and sheeplike and deferential to their elders. The Teds gave the world a blueprint for all future teen revolts.
Cohn bores down into fashion. Indeed, the Teddy Boys piece is adapted from his book "Today There Are No Gentlemen: The Changes in Englishmen's Clothes Since the War" (1971), now so scarce that the few extant copies sell for enormous sums.
Cohn returns repeatedly to New Orleans, where he has sometimes lived, and he has good antennae for how the city, mostly below sea level, pulls your spirit around with its strange tides. He describes walking the
Nik Cohn infuriated Mick Jagger by predicting that he'd lose his hair.

Jerry Stahl, right, with Ben Stiller in 1997.
French Quarter with Pete Townshend in 1972; Townshend is so blown away by the life-affirming chaos that all he can do is utter a long string of expletives.
Cohn was an aspiring rap producer in the city, and he wrote a good book about it — “Triksta: Life and Death and New Orleans Rap” (2005) — that’s excerpted here. He’s witty about all the things that can go wrong in a recording studio. The excerpt is strewed with lines like, "I'd seen dead men in coffins before, but none who'd been shot in the face."
Cohn has revised some of these old pieces, cutting them down and rewriting. He refers to this process as “remixing.” (Stahl has done the same thing.) I’m of two minds about this practice, but rare is the writer who can resist airbrushing old material and deleting idiocies.
YOU CAN INFER the tone of Stahl's book, "Gonzo Neurotic," by its title and by the first sentence of the author's note up front: "I would rather have testicle surgery, on horseback, performed by Special K-crazed lumberjacks, than sit down and read my old writing."
Well, that makes two of us, a reader is tempted to respond. In truth, Stahl is funny, self-aware and very much in on his own “professional ex-junkie” act. His pieces may fly off the tee like screaming bananas, to borrow a bit of golf slang. (I don’t play golf.) But he’s a more sober observer than he lets on.
There are essays here on the Miss America pageant — Stahl asks each contestant, hoping to shake them out of their canned responses, “What’s the worst thing that’s ever happened to you?” — and a nudist colony. Amid the meditation rooms and hydropools, he thinks to himself: “If I’m lucky I just might find Gay Talese’s wallet!”
Stahl writes about the making of “Café Flesh” (1982), the postapocalyptic porn film he co-wrote that became a cult classic. He profiles, or tries to profile (this book includes a lot of write-arounds), Marlon Brando, Benicio Del Toro, the wild-eyed TV host Tom Snyder and Hugh Grant’s short-term girlfriend Divine Brown. He wrote for “Twin Peaks” and says he was fired for turning in scripts with blood and hair on them. There are semi-believable pieces about being the Joey Chestnut of heroin.
He writes about honeymoon suites, religious television and appearing on “Oprah.” There’s a piece about ruining his liver (“my big pink organ”) that segues into a wildcat appreciation of the liver steak at Musso & Frank Grill in Los Angeles, “roughly the width of a car seat and the length of a baby’s forearm.”
Stahl is his own vivid comic invention. Life whooshes past him like arrows, and some of those arrows stick in his guts. He wonders if Ray Kroc, the McDonald's innovator, knows how much his restaurants have meant to generations of junkies. Stahl has a survivor's wariness and takes the long view. He asks, in what might be the best bit of self-help language I've ever stumbled across, "Maybe that's as close to happiness as you get — not making other people unhappy."
Ben Ratliff, the journalist and rock critic, edited Cohn's "Corner Boy." In his introduction he delivers a line that applies to both writers: "His writing on any subject is for anyone who believes that the best option is usually off the menu."
In Emily St. John Mandel's new novel, two versions of America's future crash into each other.

---
THESE DAYS AMERICANS of varying stripes worry the country faces a perilous future. Could the nation collapse into civil war? Or might it descend into a dystopian authoritarian state? In Emily St. John Mandel's ambitious and captivating new novel, "Exit Party," the answer is: maybe both.
“Exit Party” opens in a 2031 Los Angeles after “the United States had come undone following a coup d’état” where states seceded and “war had broken out within the month.” But for now, the fighting is over, the curfew in the Republic of California has been lifted, and people are ready to let loose.
Ari Waker, recently released from prison for attempted murder, joins her roommate
LINCOLN MICHEL is the author of the novels "Metallic Realms" and "The Body Scout." He writes the weekly newsletter Counter Craft.
Gloria in attending a party at her friend Kareem's apartment. Gloria is secretly pregnant with Kareem's child and traumatized by a loyalist suicide bombing that occurred at "a crowded house party" in the early days of the chaos. "When I think about parties, I think about bombs," she confesses.
EXIT PARTY
By Emily St. John Mandel
Knopf. 301 pp. \$32.
Still, the friends go . . . and then things get odd. Doppelgängers of some guests arrive while Kareem disappears without a trace. A painting, “Swan Dive,” materializes in the middle of the kitchen floor, but while Ari stares, it vanishes, “blinked out of existence.”
These events spawn a series of interlocking mysteries that the novel explores over 300 pages, a century of time and a large cast of characters. It is tricky to summarize this multilayered novel without spoiling the pleasures of its construction, but readers should know that “Exit Party” takes place in two crisscrossing universes with differing dark visions of America’s future. “There was a world where my homeland had fractured into disarray,” one character explains, “and another where my homeland had closed like a fist.”
In timeline A, Ari enters the post-collapse gig economy, taking odd jobs for militias vying for control of the former states. The narrative jumps to the future, where an older and wealthier Ari has settled in the “elite center of Paris” that’s encased in a weather-controlled dome shaped like “a series of giant soap bubbles,” protecting the rich from the ravages of climate change and pandemics. Ari lives a comfortable life as an art collector focused on “Post-Collapse Formalism.” One of her prized pieces is “Swan Dive,” which she purchased from a desperate Gloria. Then one day she is visited by Sebastian, Glo ria's now teenage son, who has come to steal the mysterious painting.
In timeline B, Ibari — Ari's double — lives a quite different life. Instead of a criminal, she's a government spy in the Internal Security Service of the authoritarian United States. While other countries in this multiverse “crumbled,” the State survived by knowing that “the difference between mayhem and order is control.” In this future, every neighbor is watching the other and if you attend “pro-democracy demonstrations” you might be turned into “a ghost” no longer “entitled to a home, or health care, or the protections of the law.”
Crafting memorable characters is always a challenge, and Mandel doubles the task for herself with her two timelines. Even so, she succeeds. Her characters are distinct in both worlds as the novel explores how circumstances determine our fates. The novel also sharply renders the psychology of formerly privileged Americans in a world turned, for them, upside down. “I just never wanted to be a part of history,” one party guest laments.
WHAT REMAINS MUDDIER are the two future Americas. Similar to Alex Garland's film "Civil War" (2024), "Exit Party" avoids discussing politics and ideology even when describing political upheaval and ideological struggle. America A is the product of an unexplained civil war along unclear fault lines. America B is a "surveillance state" of informants meeting in bureaucratic offices that could exist anywhere. Both feel more allegorical than extensions of America's specific history or its existing internecine and authoritarian tendencies, where partisan allegiances are loudly declared and surveillance is enabled via tech corporations and consumer complicity.
Still, “Exit Party” does so much so well — from tense action sequences to an inventive structure that switches up P.O.V. and form — that the novel will rightly entrance new readers while gripping Mandel’s existing ones. “Exit Party” feels like the culmination of her career so far, combining the thrills and mysteries of the author’s early crime novels with the expansive premises and speculative ruminations of later novels like “Station Eleven.” In addition to thematic connections to her prior books, there are literal ones: Ari Waker is a central character in “The Singer’s Gun” and the painter of “Swan Dive” appears in “The Glass Hotel.”
“If you live long enough,” Gloria’s double says, “you become a migrant from another timeline.” The world we know is always disappearing. “Exit Party” raises important questions about who people are when not just personal but societal circumstances change. Is everyone capable of murder or heroism? Crime or complicity? Despair or rebellion? As the narrator pointedly asks near the novel’s close, “Who will you be at the end of the world?”
The veteran travel writer Paul Theroux crisscrosses the country of his forebears for insights about how it differs from his own.

By JENNIFER SZALAI
AMONG Donald Trump's signature achievements when it comes to Canada — starting a trade war, threatening annexation, insulting its people, wrecking a longstanding alliance just because he could — the president has also managed to make a travel book about Canada improbably timely.
In “True North: On the Road in Canada,” Paul Theroux describes how an exploration of his ancestral roots in Quebec grew into a cross-country account of what Canada is and what it means to the people who live there. Canadians happen to know plenty about the United States; with its comparatively tiny population of 41 million, Canada
TRUE NORTH
On the Road in Canada
By Paul Theroux
Mariner. 423 pp. \$32.
has long paid close attention to its hulking neighbor as a matter of necessity. (I was born in Toronto.) Needless to say, the reverse hasn't been true, despite a history of American attempts to annex Canada that ended up going nowhere. “Canadians are the strangers next door,” Theroux writes. The country “is a blur to most Americans.”
Theroux, 85, presents this travel book — his 12th — as his last. “The planet is overrun with travelers and tourists, like ants on a bruised peach,” he writes, with his characteristic mix of grumpiness and verve. Having chronicled his far-flung journeys to places like Patagonia and China in previous books, Theroux says he now prefers puttering around his homes in Hawaii and on Cape Cod, where he can also sit at his desk and write his (many) novels. As a self-identified traveler, he long eschewed a tourist’s comforts, enduring the ordeal of a “decrepit bus station” or a “malodorous flophouse” in order to talk to the locals.
And talk to the locals he does. Most of “True North” recounts his conversations across Canada, with only the occasional mention of anything as obvious as a monument or a museum. He presses Canadians to “generalize” about differences between them and Americans, and gets a range of answers. Some are familiar, like the notion that Canadians are more deferential to authority and willing to work for the common good. Others are more striking. A woman in Belleville, Ontario, the birthplace of Theroux’s grandmother, considers Americans “a fearful people,” and points to the fact that they have so many guns. She asks Theroux what Americans are so afraid of. “That’s obvious,” he says. “They’re afraid of other Americans with guns.”
The book, like Theroux's journey, is mostly organized geographically, though
JENNIFER SZALAI is the nonfiction critic at The Times.
he begins with some family history in Yamaska — a tiny municipality in Quebec, where a Theroux named Antoine settled with his wife and children more than 300 years ago. The long history of these Canadian forebears is lovingly reconstructed, in often inordinate detail, and it's only when Paul Theroux himself crosses the border that the book's pace picks up.
He took a trip to freezing Ottawa in early 2022, after he heard that truckers protesting anti-pandemic measures had descended on Canada's capital in what they called a “Freedom Convoy.” Some of the organizers issued a written demand to replace the government. He wandered through the chaos, agape at the rare sight of Canadian disorder.
The non-convoy Canadians who talked to Theroux were almost unanimously appalled. He also notes that though about 20 percent of Canadian truckers are Pakistani or Sikh, you wouldn't know it from the protesters he saw. As it happened, nearly half the donations for the trucker protests came from the United States. As an article in The London Review of Books put it in April 2022, “Americans were directly funding a movement whose stated goal was to overthrow the democratically elected government of a neighboring country.”
Three years later, shortly after Trump began his second term, Theroux found that the president's barrage of insults had effectively united otherwise fractious groups of Canadians in their patriotism. Their rage has been sharpened by the sting of betrayal. Canadians put a lot of stock in fairness; a “nice country you’ve got there” shakedown is widely seen as repugnant — a violation all the more heinous when perpetrated by one’s closest ally. As one Toronto salesman tells him, “We’ve been a good friend and neighbor, we’ve fought side by side in all your wars — and what do we get for it? Abuse.”
But “True North” isn’t a flattering one-note narrative of Canadian valor. Theroux talks to Indigenous people who share devastating stories of children being abducted and sent to the country’s notorious residential schools, the last of which closed in 1997. He wonders aloud whether Canada’s approach to immigrants — promoting a “mosaic” of variegated cultures instead of a melting pot of assimilation — may have encouraged some newcomers to stay in their unassimilated “ethno-bubbles” rather than to identify with their adopted country. “No bubble dwellers seemed much troubled by the American president’s threat to make Canada the 51st state,” he writes.
Then again, that “seemed” is doing an awful lot of work. “True North” is inevitably an impressionistic book, filled with Theroux’s observations and interpretations. He’s a rambler, weaving in bits and
---
bobs of interviews, news reports, history and literary criticism. He admires the work of Robertson Davies, Margaret Atwood and Mavis Gallant, even if the stories of Alice Munro have always left him cold. "I find them overlong and wordy," he complains, "their landscapes cerebral and agitated and indoors."
Theroux, for his part, is usually charming, even when he's cranky, and even when acting the braggy American, recalling instances of Canadians telling him how much they love his work.
"True North" is the final book in Theroux's North American road trip trilogy, which began with "Deep South" and continued with "On the Plain of Snakes," about his travels in Mexico. During an especially spectacular drive in British Columbia, he has "as close to a spiritual experience as I'd ever had."
He is already hoping to return. Crossing the border into the United States, he notices the inscription on the Peace Arch, with its lofty sentiment that now reads like a poignant memento: “Children of a Common Mother — May These Gates Never Be Closed.” □
In his new book, Ben Macintyre tells the story of a Russian spy in Iran who betrayed his country in exchange for an unusual request.
By JOSEPH FINDER
THE BRITISH WRITER Ben Macintyre has made an illustrious career of taking dusty government archives and transforming them into propulsive nonfiction thrillers. His “Operation Mincemeat” was adapted for both screen and stage, and “A Spy Among Friends” became a TV series. With his latest, “Redwood,” he has done it again. The story centers on the defection of the K.G.B. major Vladimir Kuzichkin, who was stationed in Tehran during the chaos following the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
REDWOOD
The Untold Story of the Cold War's
Most Extraordinary Spy
By Ben Macintyre
Crown. 393 pp. \$32.
The reason for his defection wasn't ideology or money but sex. Specifically, he suffered from erectile dysfunction. Kuzichkin was sure that the cause was "anatomical," an overly tight foreskin, and that a circumcision would resolve it. Afraid that the Iranians or the Soviets might discover his impairment, he insisted the operation be performed in the West. "Kuzichkin was the first spy in history," Macintyre writes, "to demand, as the price of defection, the removal of his foreskin." That insistence, Macintyre argues, altered the history of the Middle East.
The stakes were enormous. The fall of the shah had deprived Washington of its closest ally in the region, the hostage crisis had severed relations with Tehran and the Soviet invasion of neighboring Afghanistan had increased fears of a greater Kremlin expansion. Iran, which shared a long border with the Soviet Union and was now at war with Iraq, seemed particularly vulnerable. Western intelligence was especially concerned about the Tudeh, Iran's pro-Soviet Communist Party, which had penetrated the government and the military. What they didn't know was how extensive the penetration was — or when Moscow intended to exploit it.
On Oct. 1, 1981, Kuzichkin entered the British Embassy in Tehran, presented himself as a vice consul with an “urgent” matter to discuss, and told Nicholas Barrington, Britain’s senior diplomat in Tehran, that he wanted to spy for Britain.
MI6 code-named him REDWOOD. He stood over 6 feet 4 inches, a head taller than his case officer; the cryptonym was chosen for the world's tallest tree (the standard rule that code names be unrevealing is, as Macintyre observes, ignored by every service on earth). Nobody in London noticed the additional double entendre
JOSEPH FINDER, who writes frequently about Russia, is the author of 17 novels including, most recently, "The Oligarch's Daughter."
until later — RED for communist, WOOD for the thing he could not achieve.
For eight months, Kuzichkin spied from the Soviet Embassy, and what he produced was extraordinary. His intelligence portrayed the Tudeh Party as a Soviet-funded puppet, directed (and very likely armed) by the K.G.B.
Astonishingly, Macintyre writes, MI6 gave everything that Kuzichkin revealed to the ayatollah — “every Tudeh leader, every informant inside the government, every member of the military underground, every K.G.B. officer and spy in Iran” — with Kuzichkin himself presenting the evidence at a secret meeting in Islamabad.
MI6 had also revealed their source and plans to the C.I.A. director William Casey. In 1982, Casey gave the operation "full-throated American support," believing that he was thereby "signing the death warrant of the Communist Party in Iran," Macintyre writes, which meant putting "the lives of several thousand people at risk."
Casey likely kept the C.I.A.'s involvement concealed not just from the Soviets but from his own government, Macintyre explains, so President Reagan could truly claim ignorance of the damning fact that the United States was publicly denouncing the Khomeini regime while secretly cooperating with it. "It is unclear," Macintyre hedges, "whether Bill Casey sought or obtained Ronald Reagan's authorization."
In Macintyre's telling, the American spy chief was working from an interagency memo warning that the Soviets could take Iran in nine to 14 weeks, a scenario that raised the possibility of an American nuclear response. But not everyone shared the panic. Macintyre himself doubts that Moscow intended to invade. The evidence for such a plan was thin. The Tudeh Party was too weak to seize power on its own, and, in the short term at least, the Kremlin also had reasons to tolerate Khomeini: However hostile he was to communism, he was even more hostile to the United States.
To forestall a danger that might have been largely imaginary, between 6,000 and 10,000 Tudeh members were apprehended and locked up, Macintyre claims, and hundreds or perhaps thousands of people died. Tudeh leaders were tortured, forced into televised confessions, and, in some cases, executed or lynched. A far wider wave of killings followed in 1988, when Khomeini

The K.G.B. agent Vladimir Kuzichkin with his wife, Galina, at a Tehran botanical garden in 1977.
---
issued a fatwa against those who “make war against God,” and prisoners who had already completed their sentences were put to death. “The exact Tudeh death toll may never be known,” Macintyre writes. “The executioners were not counting.”
Macintyre's verdict is that “the REDWOOD case was both a success and a failure, a ploy that ended in victory and defeat, a significant achievement and a grave mistake, proof of the fickle pattern of unintended consequences.” By stoking the Islamic Republic’s paranoia and brutality and helping the mullahs to consolidate power, America and Britain, he writes, “inadvertently helped create the monster” they now condemn.
Macintyre's larger point — that the Iran of 2026 was not foreseeable from Century
House in 1982 — is unarguable, and his parallel to the arming of the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan is well made.
But, of course, the consequences were foreseen, at least by some of the people who carried it out. Two senior officials said they would resign. One of them predicted that the people named in the REDWOOD files would meet “grisly ends.” British agents anticipated the crackdown. They were told, and yet they proceeded.
This doesn't mean that Casey and the MI6 members who backed the plan were cleareyed about its prospects for success. By Cold War logic, the liquidation of a bunch of communists barely mattered, especially if it could keep Iran from becoming a Soviet satellite.
One of Macintyre's more audacious conclusions is that had Viagra existed in 1981, Kuzichkin might not have defected, and there might have been a successful Tudeh coup after all with the help of Soviet firepower. The Cold War might have ended differently, or catastrophically.
It is a startling counterfactual, and one somewhat at odds with Macintyre's own skepticism about the Soviet threat. In fact, the Tudeh Party wasn't popular, even within Iran's fractured left, especially after the party joined a crackdown against independent secular and Islamist leftists who turned against the
ayatollah in the immediate aftermath of the revolution. And, despite this show of loyalty, the Islamic Republic was soon closing off the political space in which the Tudeh Party operated. By the early 1980s, its newspaper had been shut down and its official protection was wavering. Given the party's isolation and the regime's growing grip on power, a Tudeh takeover was far from inevitable.
The book's last pages are its saddest. Resettled as Alexander Larkin, a British citizen, Kuzichkin drank, ranted about hit men and was once picked up naked at a Somerset service station. One evening in 2009 he sat down with a bottle of vodka and the film "Amadeus," a story of betrayal. By morning there was nothing left in the bottle, and Kuzichkin was dead. (Until quite recently, Wikipedia still had him living.) "In his cups," Macintyre reports, he grieved the people he had helped send to their graves. The defector reached a harsher verdict than his historian does. But only one of them was there.
Set just 19 years in the future, Kurt Andersen's novel follows a family navigating a nation ruptured by civil war.

By JONATHAN DEE
NOVELS SET IN THE FUTURE aren't exclusively the province of science fiction; anxious times tend to generate anxious, cautionary literary dystopias, and when was the last time you can remember not feeling anxious? The 20th century in particular abounded in such visions, some of which — "The Handmaid's Tale," or "Brave New World," published in 1932 and getting spookier every day — have proved more prophetic than others. They're best understood, though, not as genuine bets on our future, but as dreamlike unleashings of present-day fear over the blind volatility of the moment.
THE BREAKUP
By Kurt Andersen
Random House. 556 pp. \$30.
Kurt Andersen, in his new novel “The Breakup,” does something few such books do (Jon Raymond’s excellent 2022 climate-disaster novel, “Denial,” comes to mind); he sets his stage not in some distant century when our own problems are the stuff of history, but a mere 19 years from now, when most of his readers are still likely to be around.
In an effort to game out the frightening liminality of American life in 2026, he depicts a 2045 in which — some years after a short, dirty, rather brilliantly imagined second American civil war — the country has fractured into two sloppily distinct but still official entities: the United States of America (now down to 39 states) and the Free American Republic, a largely white and Christian throwback to certain retrograde ideals with which we are all, here in the present, glumly familiar.
With peacetime established, the entirety of the former United States is allowed to vote on which of these two entities they want to join. Thus there is, this time around, nothing so geographically and imaginatively neat as a Mason-Dixon line; travelers through Southern states, for instance — where urban areas don't want to be part of the F.A.R. any more than the F.A.R. wants them — are crossing and recrossing “national” boundaries all the time. Not secession, but “disunion”: As solutions, go, it's a mess, but at least it's halted the terrorist drone attacks and the Army's responsive deployment of robots to kill rebellious American citizens in the streets. For now.
Our docents through this new American life are a family called the Zimbalists, whose own lines of fracture mirror the nation's, as they are very much aware. In
JONATHAN DEE is the author of eight novels, most recently "Sugar Street," and the director of the graduate writing program at Syracuse University.
2044, the family moved from Tennessee to San Francisco so that Asher Zimbalist could take a job running a hazily defined "Institute" on behalf of a person who may be that most elusive of species, the altruistic billionaire. But Asher's wife, Natalie, couldn't bear the culture shock. She's a poet, of all things, though one who has earned some cultural infamy as a sort of plain-spoken, Lionel Shriver-coded abuser of liberal pieties; six months ago, she moved back to Tennessee.
So have they broken up for good? Is politics to blame? They themselves aren't sure (nor are their two children), and now their hand is forced by the imminence of a long-planned tour of prospective colleges for their younger child, Logan. This tour will take them through the newly reconfigured heartland of America.
It's a good setup. What's puzzling is that more than 300 pages of the novel go by before the engine of the Zimbalist family car, and thus of the novel's plot, finally turns over, and the much-touted road trip begins. Before that comes a vast and dramatically static stretch of what speculative-fiction circles often call “world-building” — a full, inventive, elaborately detailed portrait of Andersen’s vision of the next 19 years of American history. It’s fun to read, particularly since it involves the imagined fates of a great many present-day famous people. (Among the many dozens of such cameos, surely one spoiler won’t hurt: Elon Musk dies of an overdose en route to Mars.)
As a novelist, Andersen — whose works of nonfiction include “Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire” and “Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America” — is more philosopher than plot maker. The will-they-or-won’t-they domestic drama of the Zimbalists, when it finally gets out of the driveway, is less than suspenseful; it is very much like spending a week in a car with three people laughing at a series of inside jokes and then explaining to you why those jokes are funny.
---
But so what? Domestic dramas are already thick on the ground in American fiction. What readers of “The Breakup” will come for, in this moment of what seems like unsustainable polarization and anger and wanton trampling of American civic institutions and ideals, is a vision of our near-term future that is violent and admonitory and cathartically terrible and yet somehow still survivable. On that score, Andersen delivers the dopamine hit that has made his previous work best sellers. In his 2045, there’s still a new Sally Rooney novel (one with a very funny title), and the government even offers tax credits to book publishers who hire human beings as copy editors instead of just letting A.I. do it. How dystopian can things be? □
IN THE EARLY 1980S, a small group of my mother's readers attended one of her book signings in costume. It was the first time this had ever happened. The event was a sedate gathering in a small, warmly lit San Francisco bookstore. Outside, the surrounding concrete landscape of imposing civic buildings was seemingly a world away from lush, oak-filled New Orleans, the hometown Anne had rendered as a living, breathing character in the few novels she'd published by then, a place to which her name would later become inextricably linked.
The book being casually celebrated that night was a spectacular doorstop of a novel with impressionistic angels on the cover. “Cry to Heaven,” it was called, and it explored the lives of castrato opera singers in 18th-century Italy. Wine and cheese were served. No line formed at the signing table. A slow drip of artist friends and my father’s colleagues from San Francisco State University stopped by — nothing like the glittering seven-hour marathons that would come a few years later, where exhausted managers would keep their giant stores open well past closing time to accommodate the snaking line of bejeweled Goths eager to get the latest Vampire Chronicle signed.
Without warning, in walked a trio of handsome young men in 18th-century waistcoats, their thick ponytails tied off with ribbon. I was young, but I recognized their costumes. They were characters from my mother's literary debut, published shortly before I was born. A book that haunted our lives like a pesky ghost — a critically reviled flop called “Interview With the Vampire.”
If that description seems harsh, rest assured it was my mother's own assessment of the initial reception to "Interview," which she shared on Facebook decades later. That night, as she posed for pictures with her handsome admirers, the atmosphere inside the store turned electric. Anne blushed. Her laughter took on a white-hot, unguarded quality. The first proud foot soldiers of a growing fandom had marched inside the rarefied air of a gussied-up literary party to which the guests had mostly been drawn by my father's local celebrity as a poet.
Until then, Anne Rice had been viewed as a transgressive, not-quite popular author of lusty historical fiction who had been roundly scorned by critics after daring to write a vampire's account of his long, immortal life with serious and probing literary consideration. The famous historical novelist James Michener had praised its audacity, but initial plaudits were few. These were the days when comparing a work of fiction to a comic book could erase its literary merit to most readers, and that's exactly what The New York Times did to my mother's first novel. Most of the unsold copies were pulped at the warehouse, a moment my mother would bitterly recall to the end of her life. Today, those who call "Interview With the Vampire" an "instant best seller" are carrying on a fiction as enduring as the novel itself.
But books can follow a twisty and unpredictable path to success. In the years after its disappointing publication, groups of marginalized readers gradually discovered “Interview With the Vampire.” By 1982, their collective passion was not only spreading, it was strong enough to inspire cosplay. That foggy San Francisco night was the first time it became clear to all of us that my mother's debut was being transformed from a flop into a cult classic. The costumed men were proof — elegant caricatures of Louis and Lestat, stepping out of the wet gray evening in their silky garb.
A few days later, my family gathered around the kitchen table of our Edwardian home in the Castro District, studying the photos of my mother and her admirers with excited wonder. Yes, the men were striking. But the pictures felt hot to the touch for a different reason. They were evidence that Anne's once-dismissed debut was gaining a second life, particularly among the dispossessed and outsiders — the queer, although the term was still very much a slur in those days.
Only recently did I remember how another character from “Interview” stepped out of the fog that evening, but in a more subtle and indirect way.
A trusted aunt had been my babysitter for the evening. She guided me through the store, introducing me to my parents' old friends who were there — the poets, professors, sculptors and painters who'd filled their raucous parties in the Berkeley Hills before my birth. We came to one friend particularly known for his loose lips and love of alcohol. With a wild-eyed grin he chucked my chubby cheek. "He looks like Mouse!" he cried.
Suddenly my aunt was pushing me through a forest of grown-ups as he repeated the strange words in our wake.

I looked like a mouse? No sense in getting my feelings hurt, my aunt explained. Like so many of my parents' friends, the guy was eccentric. The moment passed.
A few years later, it returned with clarity.
One day at my highly progressive elementary school, my classmates and I were learning how to make family trees. After one kid cracked a joke about how to include dead relatives, my teacher upbraided him for being insensitive. "After all," she said, "Christopher had a sister who died."
"I most certainly did not," I answered with the prim officiousness of a precocious boy raised at the adults' table by two liberal writers. I repeated the words with an insistence that brought my classmates to hysterics. "I most certainly did not."
I wasn't angry. My teacher was confused, that was all. But the wilting gravity in her expression told me I was wrong. In a moment, my entire world changed.
Mouse, as it turned out, had been my parents' nickname for Michele, the daughter they'd lost shortly before I was born, a girl I still refer to as my sister with some struggle given I will never know for myself what her voice sounded like. Her enormous brown eyes earned her the nickname. For her first four years on earth, she was a radiant, doll-like little girl. Then one afternoon she walked into the kitchen and said, "Mommy, I'm too tired to play," prompting my mother to gaze down at her with deepening dread. What 4-year-old is too tired to play?
Michele's losing battle with leukemia cast my parents in the dark saga that gave birth to "Interview With the Vampire." And so in a way, Claudia, the child vampire frozen in her youth who completes the tragic trio at the novel's center, made an appearance at that San Francisco book signing as well, even if she didn't come in costume.
Why did they keep the secret from me? Simply put, they'd lost one child to a blood-borne illness and been granted another beset by anxiety. They didn't want to unleash the tragedy of what they'd endured on a son who could already hysterically imagine his bed was circled by sharks. But once I knew, they reacted with stunning generosity and candor. All the doors to their hidden past opened.
The crude drawings that hung on the walls of my father's home office? They weren't the work of a former neighbor's child, as he'd once told me. My every question about Michele was answered with bracing, unguarded truth. What her voice sounded like, what foods she loved. (I don't know how the child of a professor and a struggling writer managed to taste escargot, but it was one of

---
her favorites.) The only barrier to my quest for information was my own hesitation to hear the quake of grief enter my mother's voice or watch a wet sheen appear in my father's eyes.
For years, I continued this halting interview of my parents about their defining tragedy, and for years my parents responded to every query with gentleness and honesty. If the interview had a climax, it came almost a decade after it began, when the three of us sat at a table outside a New Orleans restaurant. My mother's success had allowed us to move there in 1988 when I was 10. Three years later I had worked up the nerve to ask the question that had plagued me from the beginning. "What happened the day she died?"
We'd visited many other parts of their journey by then. I knew about the letters from leading cancer centers
that said my sister's case was hopeless. I knew that, at the doctor's recommendation, my parents never gave Michele her exact diagnosis or prognosis, just the constant, gentle refrain that she was ill and needed care. I even knew about the blood bag that burst next to her hospital bed the night before she died, and the last words she'd said to my father when he'd promised they would clean it up. "For me, your baby," she'd said softly.
But I didn't know about that awful, final day.
And so they told me. They told me about the alarm that went off when her heartbeat dropped below a certain rate. They told me about the doctor who exhausted himself performing CPR before he said sadly, "We're kidding ourselves here." They told me about the light kiss goodbye my father gave her on the lips, only to be startled by the soft give of lifelessness that greeted it. And together, at a table on a leafy, sun-drenched New Orleans avenue, the three of us cried. We cried for Mouse. But I, in no small part, cried for my parents as well.
I didn't know it then, but I could have found the answers I was looking for in their work as well. As an adult I would discover my father had enshrined every awful beat of my sister's last night into a single, searing poem called "Incanto."
Anne in her blue robe astonished, after two years, still,
at the last moment,
ASTONISHED.
My mother's work was less overt. Memoir was not Anne's passion. She adopted it as a form for the fictional accounts of her immortals, but she prided herself on transcending what she called the pedestrian details of experience. After I became a published author, she sometimes praised those aspects of my work in ways that came off as unintentionally conde-
scending. “I could never write a book about going to high school,” she once told me with a proud smile. I’m still not sure whether she was more pleased about my having done just that, or about her own determination to refuse.
If “Interview With the Vampire” bears any trace of my sister’s illness, with its nightmarish hospital stays, brutal treatments and financial devastation (my parents were so broke by the end, Michele was buried without a headstone), they have been transposed by metaphor into elements as gilded as they are bloody.
Except for one.
The idea that Michele was behind the child vampire Claudia seems bracingly obvious to anyone who reads the book with Anne's biography in mind. But the implication offended my mother for years.
Eventually, the scales fell from her eyes. Perspective allowed her to see what others had suggested: a beautiful golden-haired girl who can never physically age, and a psyche that undergoes the perpetual sophistication of immortality while trapped inside the infuriating confines of a child's body. If these are not intentionally a meta-
phor for Michele herself, they were at least crafted by a mother's grief, fueled by her desire to keep her daughter alive and growing even without a mature body in which to place her.
It's also apparent that my mother's loss blew open the wide expanse of her title character's centuries of perspective on the world: his crushing guilt, his rage at death, his sometimes crippling despair over the predatory cycles that define earthly existence. Louis de Pointe du Lac struggles with profound questions about the human condition after a vampire's bite converts him, condemning him to take life to survive. Anne too confronted rage and anguish and doubt after watching the most precious and vulnerable thing in her life waste away as she stood by helplessly — “astonished,” as my father wrote.
In 2021, my mother died of complications from a stroke at the age of 80. By then, she had published 37 novels and her success had turned her into a household name. The honor of caring for her estate passed to me and her dear friend Eric Shaw Quinn through our production company, Dinner Partners, which Anne helped us start. (She was the first guest on our first podcast episode.) Covid didn't take Anne, but pandemic restrictions prevented us from having a large public service. Still, her passionate fans wanted a collective way to mourn. Over the next four years, Eric and I worked tirelessly to produce a celebration that would blend theater and an anthology of original documentary films to tell her story.
But what was the story of Anne?
There were the obvious threads that countless journalists had followed before. That she transformed the vampire novel by writing from the vampire's perspective. That her portrait of two men attempting to raise a child together in a dark and hostile world that demands secrecy about their true nature was a groundbreaking representation of queerness. That the 1994 film adaptation of "Interview With the Vampire," for which Anne wrote the screenplay, remains a horror classic, a time capsule from a bygone era in which lavish studio films tackled dark, sophisticated themes and were rewarded for it at the box office.
We would include those, for sure. But were any of them really the story of Anne herself? Of course, we knew Michele's death would be the dark centerpiece. But Anne's fans weren't planning to travel to New Orleans and fill the Orpheum Theater because she'd lost a daughter. It was her response to that loss that would draw them from all over the world. Days before our event, as I struggled to find a central thesis for the speech I planned, it was Eric who offered one with simple clarity. "Your mother turned the worst thing that ever happened to her into the best thing that ever happened to her."
That was it. The dominant theme of Anne's life was not just her greatest loss, but how she endured it.
If the subsequent novels in the Vampire Chronicles tell the story of how Anne survived terrible loss, “Interview With the Vampire” gives us a story that captures the spiritual and psychological fundamentals of what she survived. Out of the agony of my sister’s death, she spun a world of love and rage, of family, blood and savage beauty, that had us all dancing until midnight in costumes ranging from the flowing silk to naked abandon, a feat only a remarkable few achieve during their lifetimes. □
Sebastian Barry's novel tours a post-Civil War America where cruelty is ever-present but love endures.

By IAN McGUIRE
"THE NEWER WORLD," the latest novel from the Irish writer Sebastian Barry, follows on from two of his earlier works, "Days Without End" (2016) and "A Thousand Moons" (2020). The protagonist, Tennyson Bouguereau, a Black man born into slavery in Tennessee around 1840, is a minor character in both books, and much of the first quarter of the new novel is taken up with brisk summaries of previously narrated events.
These catch-ups will be useful for those already familiar with the other volumes, but for new readers their necessary brevity will be confusing. For that reason, although “The Newer World” is certainly understandable as a stand-alone novel, it is probably best approached and appreciated as the third part of a trilogy.
Barry divides his story into three roughly equal sections. The first moves swiftly through Tennyson's childhood and,
THE NEWER WORLD
By Sebastian Barry
Viking. 259 pp. \$28.
after he and his sister, Rosalee, are freed, ends with the post-Civil War period in which Confederate sympathizers effectively retake control of western Tennessee.
In the second part, Tennyson, now fearing for his life, flees to Nashville, where he enters a newly established school for freedmen. Recognized for his musical talent, he joins the choir and develops an intense friendship with George, a fellow singer. He also falls in love with a woman named Minnie, who is headstrong and beautiful but not entirely trustworthy. Barry is excellent on the power of Black music to stir emotion and provoke empathy, and the scenes in which the choir performs before racist audiences are some of the strongest in the novel.
There is an abrupt and somewhat disconcerting shift in the final section, when George and Tennyson both leave the school, join the Army and then, in a direct echo of events described in “Days Without End,” are sent west to fight against the Apaches.
"The Newer World," "A Thousand Moons" and "Days Without End" are all set in the Southern and Western states in the years before, during and after the Civil War. As well as having many characters and scenes in common, they are linked thematically by their focus on the extreme prejudice, hatred and violence endured by Black people and Native Americans during this extraordinary period in the nation's history. When it comes to describing
IAN McGUIRE'S latest novel is "White River Crossing."
acts of racial violence, Barry rarely holds back, and a good deal of the trilogy's power comes from the stark lyricism with which he relates acts of enormous cruelty.
“Days Without End” contains lengthy and harrowing descriptions of the Army’s genocidal actions against the Yurok and Sioux, and the plot of “A Thousand Moons” centers on the violent rape of Winona Cole, a Lakota girl. In “The Newer World,” Tennyson’s parents are both murdered by white slave-owners, and he and his sister endure brutal assaults.
But the violence in these three novels, although important, is never the whole story. Just as central, and as persistent, is love. At the heart of “Days Without End” is the queer romance between the narrator, Thomas McNulty, a silver-tongued, cross-dressing Irish immigrant, and his quarter-Indian beau, John Cole. In “A Thousand
---
Moons" the youthful Winona finds comforts in the arms of Peg, a fellow orphan.
In both novels, Barry makes it clear that a form of deep familial love (however non-traditional that family may be) can balance out political and social brutality, making life bearable even for those who have suffered great trauma. This unusual conjunction of hair-raising violence and a slightly gushing emotionality is what gives the two earlier novels their undeniable originality and charm.
"The Newer World" seems ready on occasion, especially in its rather odd third movement, to repeat the comforting pattern established by its antecedents, but it is unable to do so satisfactorily. Whereas Thomas and Winona are passionate, wholehearted and utterly faithful to their lovers, Tennyson in his convoluted relations with George and Minnie is vacillating and uncertain. He seems unable to understand his own desires and is frequently at a loss to explain the decisions he has made or failed to make.
This would not be a problem if we felt that Barry fully understood and was able to communicate to the reader the reasons for his protagonist's confusion and self-doubt, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Instead, the puzzlement feels generalized and remains unresolved, which makes for a novel that strives to be more psychologically and emotionally complex than its precursors but ends up feeling significantly less sure-footed and coherent.
Fights, feuds and insults are all in a day's work for Ari Emanuel, who offers an unvarnished look at his career in a new memoir.
By ALEXANDRA JACOBS
FORGET THE "ODYSSEY." In his staccato, profane and vindictive new book, "Roll the Calls," Ari Emanuel invokes Homer's prequel, the "Iliad," whose first word is "rage." And "forget" is not the F-word he'd use.
Emanuel is a Hollywood superagent — that term now appropriated by A.I., the imminent industry crusher barely acknowledged in this book's pages. This is all A.R.I., baby.
He's represented people so famous they're one-named, like Oprah and the man formerly known as "the Donald," and became famous and one-named himself after "Entourage," the early-aughts HBO series featuring Ari Gold, the scenery-chewing-and-spewing character played by Jeremy Piven.
He's also youngest of the three high-achieving Emanuel brothers (Zeke, the doctor; Rahm, the politician); and his place in the birth order and relative struggles at school, Ari argues here, are what motivated him to become the richest.
“Third rail,” Emanuel tells a therapist nicknamed Dr. Calm, explaining how being treated as stupid sets off his notorious temper. “The only way I can describe it. Like an electric charge running through me. Zeerp! I lose all control.”
In recent years, showbiz bigwigs like Scott Rudin and Will Smith have been brought low after their own Zeerp! moments: furloughed from their careers and forced to apologize for their behavior.
Rage has an image problem. But move over, mindfulness; sayonara to stoicism: "Roll the Calls" wants to rebrand rage as potentially elevating, the way Gordon Gekko made greed good in "Wall Street."
“Rage might not solve every problem (or any problem), but it sure as hell clarifies the problem,” Emanuel writes, or dictates (nested in his acknowledgments is J.R. Moehringer, the A-list ghostwriter who worked with Prince Harry). “Rage brings things to a head.”
My editor has barred me from using any more cutesy portmanteaus, just as Emanuel was once barred from the studio lot at Disney, but I'm going to make like Ari and barrel forth anyway. This may be the world's first mad-moir. Or . . . mad-ifesto.
It's the story of how a kid with dyslexia and A.D.H.D. rose from licking envelopes for the very literary Robby Lantz, whose clients included James Baldwin and Carson McCullers; to the mailroom and upward at CAA; to cofounding the upstart agency Endeavor; to gobbling up William Morris and IMG. Notably, his jumbo bowl of alphabet soup, under the name TKO Group Holdings, now includes the fight giants U.F.C. and WWE.
ALEXANDRA JACOBS is a Times book critic and occasional features writer. She joined The Times in 2010.
A wrestler himself in high school after tussling in childhood with his brothers (“two violent psychopaths” — one of the few insults that seem like a joke), Ari has taken this opportunity to pin his opponents to the mat in print.
On Barry Diller, after a meeting about Live Nation: "The dude is just a mélange of old farts and bad ideas." And furthermore: "BORRRR-ing."
"That glad-handing phony" and "that [bleeping] putz" are the niceties leveled at Jeffrey Katzenberg.
ROLL THE CALLS
By Ari Emanuel
Knopf. 432 pp. \$35.
And to Irving Azoff, after Azoff tried to poach a client: "You are fundamentally a liar and selfish . . . You can lie to other people and think you'll get away with it. That's not happening with me. I'm not from this town. My roots are elsewhere and let me tell you something: I don't forget and won't forget. I keep grudges for a lifetime."
And this was a "side skirmish"!
Emanuel's roots are middle-class Chicago, but also Jerusalem, where his father, Benjamin, who became a pediatrician, was born after his forebears fled the pogroms in Ukraine. The family name was changed from Auerbach in honor of Benjamin's brother, Emanuel, who was killed by a stray bullet. Ari remembers wetting his pants during a prison attack in the West Bank when he was 7.
He was touring the prison because his mother, Marsha, was friends with the local police chief. She was a civil rights activist and tough cookie — Ari feels a kinship with Jackson Pollock upon hearing that the painter's mother was "volatile" and "withholding." She put his bad report cards on the refrigerator alongside those of his better-performing brothers. "She wasn't like other moms," he writes. "She cursed a lot."
Emanuel had an adopted younger sister with disabilities, Shoshana, but this book is primarily a Battle of the Gods in which we learn little of her, or his relationships with women. Those include a long first marriage to Sarah Hardwick Addington, with whom he has three sons and a daughter; and a second marriage to the much younger designer Sarah Staudinger, whom he refers to by the brand name of her clothing line, Staud.
"You fired me, Ari, and let me put this in a way you'll understand," Staud tells him when he wants her back after, incredibly, making Dr. Calm call her for a break. "If I let you rehire me, I want a promotion. And equity. Or else I quit."
Emanuel is a talker, not a reader; he gives Rahm the middle finger on a panel after he jokes Ari can't read anything over 200 pages. "Roll the Calls" is over 400, but goes fast, to Moehringer's credit, as if it were barked into a voice-memo app and transcribed by a quivering assistant. The iPhone has only accelerated Emanuel's roll. "I'll use my teleputer on you like a two-by-four," he asserts, using the word coined presciently by George Gilder in "Life After Television" (1990).
Oh, for 1990, when it was a flex merely to order off-menu at Spago!
The storied agent Sam Cohn devoured paper, who knows why. Bill Block popped raw garlic, we learn, to enhance his testosterone. Ari Emanuel? He ingests a daily cup of live worms to address what he calls (without irony) “inflammation,” recommending to an old antagonist, Mike Ovitz — how they’ve mellowed — that he do the same.
But these days Hollywood is less concerned with “hugging it out,” Gold’s signature catchphrase, than with Hugging Face. Will any of us eat lunch in this town again? □

The fashion designer Sarah Staudinger and talent agent Ari Emanuel in 2025.
A journalist charts the rise and fall of the Wall Street billionaire Leon Black, who gave millions to Jeffrey Epstein.
By JONATHAN MAHLER

Leon Black at the Museum of Modern Art in 2024.
THE FINANCIER Leon Black may be entitled to his own wall in the rogues' gallery of Jeffrey Epstein's enablers. Between 2012 and 2017, Black gave Epstein a staggering \$158 million — or more than \$170 million if you count a big loan that Epstein had not made good on when he hanged himself in his jail cell in 2019. Not only did the revelations of these payments put a premature end to Black's Wall Street career, they ensured that he would be remembered not as one of the great dealmakers of his time but as Epstein's most generous client.
In “Money to Burn,” the journalist William D. Cohen offers a detailed account of Black’s rise and fall. A former investment banker himself, Cohen is nothing if not thorough, and “Money to Burn” is a coup of reporting, based on extensive interviews with Black, his business partners and many others who are often quoted at great, and at times trying, length.
Cohan is telling two stories, really. One is about Black. The other is about the private equity firm he built, Apollo Global Management, which has been at the center of Wall Street's ongoing transformation from a place dominated by relatively staid banks and brokerage houses to a more shadowy realm ruled by “alternative asset managers” who raise and lend their own capital.
Black's arc makes for an almost perfect parable for the corrupting influence of money. His father, Eli, was settling into life as a Long Island rabbi when he pivoted in the mid-1940s. A career in finance, he reasoned without apparent irony, could be just as rewarding as one in the pulpit, as long as “men of virtue” were in charge.
Eli Black became enormously successful, the architect and chief executive of an international conglomerate called the United Brands Company. But his life ended tragically: In early 1975, with the company facing mounting financial problems and a bribery scandal, he leaped out the window of his 44th-floor office in Manhattan's Pan Am Building.
None of this ultimately deterred Leon from going into finance. Armed with a pair of Ivy League degrees (Dartmouth College, Harvard Business School), he started his career in 1977 at Drexel Burnham Lambert, the junk-bond powerhouse where men of virtue were in distinctly short supply.
When Drexel was forced into bankruptcy in 1990, following a protracted federal investigation into illegal trading, Black launched Apollo. He and his new team raised hundreds of millions of dollars to get started. Their plan was to leverage
JONATHAN MAHLER is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and the author, most recently, of "The Gods of New York: Egotists, Idealists, Opportunists, and the Birth of the Modern City: 1986-1990."
---
The Unvarnished Truth About Leon Black, Apollo, and the Rise of a New Wall Street By William D. Cohan
Portfolio. 667 pp. \$40.
this money to gain control of distressed companies and then have their way with them.
As Cohen makes clear, sucking profits out of struggling businesses was hard work that often entailed logic-defying feats of financial engineering and self-dealing. Needless to say, Black and his partners fared a lot better in these ventures than the employees or customers of the entities they bought. A series of sexual assaults at an Apollo-owned acute-care facility in Iowa helped prompt a Senate report, whose title — “Profits Over Patients: The Harmful Effects of Private Equity on the U.S. Health Care System” — speaks volumes and yet may still understate the matter.
Bargain hunting became not just a career but an avocation for the billionaires who ran Apollo. In 2011, Josh Harris, an Apollo co-founder and Black protégé, bought a big stake in an N.B.A. franchise, the down-on-their-luck Philadelphia 76ers. Another co-founder, Marc Rowan, set his sights on the Long Island surf town of Montauk, where, to the fury of many locals, he turned an affordable seafood shack into an upmarket one that, in 2019, served a \$54 lobster Cobb salad and \$795 bottles of rosé.
I guess everyone needs a hobby. Black's was art. In 2012, he spent nearly \$120 million for Edvard Munch's 1895 drawing of "The Scream." By then, Black had long been friendly with Epstein, whom he had met at a wedding in 1996. He would eventually fork over tens of millions of dollars to the convicted pedophile and registered sex offender.
Black spoke at length to Cohen about his interactions with Epstein, presumably believing that this book might help him clear his name. And Cohen gives Black plenty of room to mount his defense, however preposterous it may seem: Black claims that he paid Epstein these exorbitant sums — many multiples of what a first-rate Wall Street trusts-and-estates lawyer would charge, as Cohen notes — solely for his tax-and estate-planning advice.
Cohan seems skeptical, but neither does he fully endorse the alternative and seemingly far more credible explanation: that Epstein was less financial adviser than personal fixer for Black, helping him manage his illicit relationships with numerous women.
The news of Black's entanglement with Epstein first broke in 2019. Then, in March 2021, Guzel Ganieva, a young Russian woman to whom Black had paid millions of dollars in hush money, wrote on Twitter that she'd been sexually abused by him.
Days later, Black stepped down from Apollo, naming Rowan — not Harris, who had long aspired to succeed him — as chief executive. A few months after that, Black filed a RICO suit against Harris and Ganieva, accusing them of conspiring to make her sexual-abuse claims public in an effort to push him out. Black's complaint compares Harris to "Shakespeare's lago," alleging that once Harris knew he was being passed over for the big job at Apollo, he turned his wrath on his former mentor.
“It’s hard to imagine that that’s where we’re at,” a befuddled Harris told Cohan about Black’s charges. Indeed, reading Black’s unhinged theories about Harris, a different Shakespeare character comes to mind: King Lear. The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in Manhattan in 2022. A year later, though, Black prevailed in a civil suit that Ganieva had filed against him, accusing him of defamation and sexual assault.
In laying out this sordid saga, Cohan offers a lot of conflicting claims. It's my one real gripe with this book: Cohan is so focused on allowing his subjects to have their say — and, perhaps, on making the most of his considerable access — that he delegates too much of the storytelling to them rather than forcefully shaping the narrative himself.
Last March, a few of my colleagues at The New York Times made a convincing case that Epstein's services included helping Black obscure millions of dollars that he paid to a dozen women, at least some of whom he had sexual encounters with, a report that Black denied. For whatever reason, in "Money to Burn," Cohan doesn't reach his own conclusion about the mystery at the heart of Black's story: What, exactly, was he paying Epstein for? The resulting picture of Black's relationship with Epstein — and, in turn, of Black himself — is blurry.
Setting this issue aside, “Money to Burn” is an engaging and valuable work, a portrait of a man and a milieu whose inexhaustible devotion to the accumulation of personal wealth may test your faith in capitalism. What’s more, if Black’s hope was that Cohan would help redeem his character, he may be disappointed with the final product, which closely chronicles his tawdry descent into infamy.
And yet the joke may be on us. Since Black's departure, Apollo has moved more aggressively into the private-credit markets, exploiting its advantage over banks and brokerage houses, whose debt loads and lending practices are much more heavily regulated. Business is booming. By 2029, Apollo aims to have \$1.5 trillion in assets under management — more than the G.D.P. of Indonesia. Black has been thoroughly disgraced in the court of public opinion, but he is still Apollo's largest individual shareholder. With an estimated personal fortune of around \$15 billion, he is surely richer than ever.
A reporter draws together a bushel of figures who thrived in one fateful decade.

President Trump in the Oval Office in July.
By RICK PERLSTEIN
SOME SAY Leo Tolstoy's “War and Peace,” with its scores of plots and subplots carried out by hundreds of named characters, is not a proper novel at all. Instead, all that fine-grained narrative specificity is grist for the book’s essayistic critiques of what actually concerns the author: the way historians reduce history to over-tidy categories that explain how things turned out. “Any conclusion of historical science, without the least effort on the part of criticism, falls apart like dust, leaving nothing be-
WHEN AMERICA ROARED
How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today
By Jonathan Kaufman
Viking. 294 pp. \$35.
hind," he insisted, because "any chosen historical unit is always arbitrary" — including what we call a historical "period."
Tolstoy would especially despise the way many history books, in our own time, isolate a single decade or a single year to “explain how we live now.” Were we able to place before the master a book called “1969: The Year Everything Changed,” then one called “1968: The Year That Rocked the World,” then “1967: The Year of Fire and Ice,” then “1966: The Year the Decade Exploded,” then “The Last Innocent Year: America in 1964,” he would point out what we all should see: If every year can be said to have been the most important, then none of them were. (He might also say 1965 needs a better literary agent.)
The problem is the same with “decade” books. And yet they proliferate, perhaps because, in a time when profit margins are tight in the literary world and the corporations that own publishing imprints demand predictable returns, decade-bound tomes are easier to sell than more nuanced stuff.
Jonathan Kaufman's “When America Roared: How the 1980s Saved, Then Broke, the Country — and Led Us to Today” is hardly the worst of the genre. The organizing idea is sound: The embrace of market dynamism during the years of Ronald Reagan's presidency broke through the stagnation and alienation of the years that immediately preceded it, but led in turn to inequality and alienation and populist discontent of our own time.
Kaufman assembles his narrative out of the interlocking stories of several figures he finds exemplary, including G.E.'s superstar C.E.O. Jack Welch, who fought against labor organizing; the Black investor John Rogers, whose rise in 1980s Chicago, Kauf-
RICK PERLSTEIN is the author of several books, including "Reaganland: America's Right Turn 1976-1980."
man argues, paved the way for Barack Obama; the former anti-Vietnam War activist Karen Nussbaum, whose spectacular success organizing secretaries into a union called 9to5 inspired the hit 1980 film of the same name; and Evan Wolfson, the Yale grad who navigated between the Scylla of conservative resistance and the Charybdis of ultraleft movement radicals to turn gay marriage into a legally imaginable goal. There are useful insights along the way, though none are mind-blowing, and some are banal; and some are incorrect.
It is always interesting to review the saga of Welch, a working-class child of a postwar prosperity built on strong unions, community-minded corporations and activist government who proceeded proudly and ruthlessly to decimate all of that and thus ruin the future prospects of the generations of working-class children who came
---
after him.
Nussbaum serves as Welch's main narrative foil. Her efforts in the 1970s turning harried victims of an office world that resembled “Mad Men” into a political force soon hit the same wall all late-20th-century union organizers hit, in the midst of the “unprecedented assault on unions” that Kaufman says began in 1981, shortly after Reagan moved into the White House.
The problem with this formulation is that the assault was anything but unprecedented (before the 1940s, labor agitators were frequently shot); and its pieces were well in place by the end of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, whom the historian and New Deal partisan Arthur Schlesinger found so neglectful of labor that he said Carter was, actually, “not a Democrat — at least in anything more recent than the Grover Cleveland sense of the word”: a good example of how the “decade that changed everything” frame obscures more than it enlightens.
Kaufman's freshest and most interesting contribution is his portrait of Mark Fowler, Reagan's first chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. It's fascinating to learn, from Kaufman's interviews with him, that Fowler's passion for obliterating regulation of TV and radio broadcasts, which he considered a world-altering intervention in the history of liberty, was borne out of an irritation with having to fill out logbooks to document what songs and public-service announcements he played, in his college days as a rock D.J.
It is frustrating, however, to see how much Kaufman gets wrong about one of the important consequences of this deregulation: the rise of right-wing shock jocks like Rush Limbaugh. This telling imputes their success not to politics but to a simplistic class resentment: Limbaugh's listeners were, Kaufman contends, "overwhelmingly middle- and lower-class white men" left behind once newspapers and public radio "abandoned them" for more affluent audiences. This is incorrect, as a matter of both sociology and intent; Limbaugh himself, in 1991, boasted that he prioritized callers with car phones, because they must be rich.
"When America Roared" is best once Kaufman abandons the market-forged manacles of the "decade" conceit and turns to his own life story. As a young journalist in the late 1980s, he was The Boston Globe's second reporter on the scene after the massacre in Tiananmen Square, where activists had littered Beijing streets with broken bottles to taunt the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, whose name sounds like the Mandarin words for "little bottle." Then he was sent to the crumbling Eastern bloc, where during the final protests against Communist rule he heard rumors that Leipzig hospitals had been stocking up on blood, fearing a Tiananmen Square-style crackdown.
Tolstoy's favorite metaphors for historical change involved oceans. “Though the surface of the historical sea seemed immobile, mankind moved as ceaselessly as the movement of time,” he wrote in “War and Peace.” You can describe the fascinating things that float on the surface, but grasping the underlying, invisible currents that brought them there, over a year or a decade, before they sink below the froth to contribute to future tidal shifts, is a task for masters. Some can do it — Christian Caryl in “Strange Rebels: 1979 and the Birth of the 21st Century” is my particular favorite — but Kaufman doesn't quite pull it off here. A memoir about his stint as a young reporter as Communism was falling apart, though: That's a book I'd want to read.

In three new picture books, young offspring taste independence from messy, ‘sticky’ and nurturing family bonds.

---
FAMILIES: Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em. And who, besides long-term analysands, knows that better than kids tasting independence by pushing against those messy, sticky and — best-case scenario — nurturing bonds? It's a theme that underscores shelves and shelves' worth of classic children's literature.
Three terrific new books — each a marvel of imagination, sensitivity and craft — take up the baton. All contain art so thematically and visually audacious that, if I didn't quite gasp when I first turned the pages, I mouthed a silent “whoa.” Or laughed out of sheer delight.
Among the trio, Christian Robinson's "Dad" addresses the youngest audience. Robinson is one of the 21st century's foremost picture-book makers, illustrating his own stories as well as others' — notably Matt de la Peña's "Last Stop on Market Street," for which Robinson was a Caldecott honoree (and de la Peña won a Newbery Medal). His new book's text and premise are simple: Short sentences detailing fatherly attributes are juxtaposed with illustrations of animal dads (and a few human ones) rendered in his trademark mix of collage and paint.
For “Dad is strong,” Robinson offers a wary-looking gorilla, his body as heavy and graceful as a Henry Moore sculpture, standing guard over his child. You can feel
BRUCE HANDY is the author, most recently, of "Hollywood High," a history of teen movies, and "Balloon," a picture book illustrated by Julie Kwon.

the strength in the ape's massive forearms, and the love in the sheltering curves of his back and shoulders.
"Dad holds on tight" depicts a papa sea-horse with a baby in his pouch, his tail clutching a strand of seaweed. The ocean
DAD
By Christian Robinson
Balzer + Bray. 48 pp. \$19.99.
(Ages 3 to 6)
THE MUÉGANOS
By Jaque Jours
Transit Children's Editions. 48 pp. \$20.95.
(Ages 3 and up)
NOBODY BUT ME
By Sara Lundberg
Translated by B.J. Woodstein
Triangle Square. 64 pp. \$21.95.
(Ages 4 to 7)
depths are ebony black, so we can only sense the threat of a strong current in the bending seaweed and the protective tension in the silvery seahorse's spiny body. It's a sublime composition.
Though “Dad” leans more into attachment than testing family bonds, Robinson wisely acknowledges that fathers may have shortcomings. “Dad needs lots of space.” (Illustration: a toothy, grimacing shark.) “Dad lets you down.” (A carefree gibbon ignoring his charge.)
“Dad had to go away” depicts two owlets left behind in their nest. Behind them, a jagged opening to the sky feels like a wound. In a letter included with reviewers' copies, Robinson writes that his own father “wasn’t around growing up, and I am not yet a dad myself.” For me, that bit of back story makes a remarkable book even more remarkable.
Did I mention messy, sticky bonds? The debut author-illustrator Jaque Jours makes them literal in “The Muéganos,” a wonderfully droll book about a rabbit family named for a “traditional Mexican candy made of small, square pieces of fried wheat dough, stuck together with honey or pilon-cillo syrup.” (Jewish readers may be reminded of teiglach.)
As portrayed in Jours's mixed-media art, the five Muéganos — Papá, Mamá and three children, including Julia, our protagonist — are joined together at the shoulders, the bunnies' feet dangling amusingly in the air. "They are never apart," she writes. "Papá Muégano says honey glues them together. Mamá says it's love. Julia thinks it is a little boring."
And there, fiction workshoppers and child-psychology students, is your primal conflict!
One day, while visiting a museum, Julia's "simple urge" to wander off by herself and see what she wants to see is so strong that it makes "something crack." Jours depicts the family starting to splinter and then, with the page turn, a stunning image: a tiny but big-eyed Julia alone in a black void that also suggests a torn page. Is she exhilarated, terrified or merely startled? Probably all three.
Back home, the family tries to repair the breach, but “some things are just inevitable,” a truth Jours illustrates with broken Delft-style crockery. Her ending is a happy one, though. Genuinely loving families learn to allow breathing room.
Sara Lundberg's "Nobody but Me," translated by B.J. Woodstein, is a masterpiece with a wordless middle section that defies easy summary.
One summer day a little boy visits a lake with his mom. Itching to do something by himself, he unties a small inflatable raft and drifts off — in the literal sense but also,
---
maybe, in the sleepy sense. Gentle (at first) waters carry him on a dreamlike journey through an enveloping forest and then into the wider world, where, among other things, he finds love (or at least friendship) and danger.
But don't worry: A trio of forest children in leaf skirts — sprites, perhaps — serve as guardians and keep trouble from getting out of hand. Changed but unchanged, the boy drifts back to his mom clutching a seed, which he plants when they return home. It too will grow.
Lundberg, a beloved and well-honored Swedish picture-book maker, works here in a vivid, liquid, painterly style that reminds me of David Hockney's late-period landscapes; you want to dive in.
“Nobody but Me” won’t be for every kid, or adult, but it will touch something in many, even if they don’t yet know what that something is. □
Above, Christian Robinson's art from "Dad." Below, art by Jaque Jours from "The Muéganos" (left) and Sara Lundberg from "Nobody but Me."
---
---

---
Kuang, a successful fantasy writer, once again explores the link between language and empire in this realistic novel about an American student adrift in Taiwan. By homing in on everyday dramas of midterms and sisters and sex, she shows she's as skilled at literary fiction as she is at its speculative cousin; if you didn't know better it would be hard to imagine her writing in any other register.

---
In this rich study of the Blow plantation in Virginia — not far from the site of Nat Turner's 1831 uprising — the Pulitzer-winning historian Taylor endeavors to separate tradition from the truth, attending carefully to the mix of high-minded sympathy and chilling cruelty that churned inside American slave owners. The result is like a nonfiction version of William Faulkner's "Absalom, Absalom!"

SWITZY, by Emma Cline. (Random House. 352 pp. \$32.)
Cline's new novel gets inside the head of a stoic businessman with dementia, who is flying to Switzerland to end his life — but not before confronting the boarding-school roommate who has held an outsize place in his psyche. A Booker nominee, and a significant swerve from Cline's female- and youth-centric earlier fiction, "Switzy" does so much so very well; Cline collates beautifully the absurd detritus of modernity.
---
---

---
Choose from a variety of gift subscriptions — there's one to suit nearly everyone.
Visit nytimes.com/gift or call 855-698-5273.

---

SHADOW TICKET, by Thomas Pynchon. (Penguin Books. 304 pp. \$20.)
In Depression-era Wisconsin, Hicks McTaggart, a reluctant private eye, is tasked with what appears to be a straightforward
assignment: to find and return a wandering cheese heiress. The job takes him to Eastern Europe, where he becomes entangled in a world of swing dancers, motorcycle outlaws, Soviet agents and Nazis rendered with classic Pynchonian excess.

TOWER OF BASEL: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank That Runs the World, by Adam LeBor. (Public-Affairs. 416 pp. \$22.99.)
The Bank of International Settlements, a "bank for central banks," as LeBor calls it, is a little-known but crucial
institution at the center of the world's economy. His account, first published in 2013, chronicles the bank's checkered past — it was a vital supporter of the Nazi regime during World War II — to shed light on the political and moral ramifications of global finance.

THE WILDERNESS, by Angela Flournoy. (Mariner. 304 pp. \$18.99.)
Narrated in shifting perspectives, Flournoy's novel traces the lives of four friends — Desiree, January, Monique and Nakia — over two decades
beginning in 2008, as they grapple with the demands of adulthood, friendship and an increasingly volatile 21st century. Our reviewer, Niela Orr, called it a book that attests to “the ways a person’s mind can become a haunted house, its private ghosts compounding with time.” | THIS WEEK | LAST WEEK | Paperback Trade Fiction | WEEKS ON LIST | 1 | 1 | THEO OF GOLDEN, by Allen Levi. (Atria) A man travels to a small Southern town, where he purchases pencil drawings of local residents and exchanges them for stories. | 43 | 2 | GRIM TIDINGS, by B. K. Borison. (Avon) The second book in the Ghosted series. A Grim Reaper looking to not do harm forms an unexpected alliance with a Guardian Angel. | 1 | 3 | 2 | DUNGEON CRAWLER CARL, by Matt Dinniman. (Ace) A Coast Guard vet named Carl and his ex-girlfriend's cat, Princess Donut, are trapped in a fantasy dungeon. | 38 | 4 | 3 | VERITY, by Colleen Hoover. (Grand Central) Lowen Ashleigh is hired by the husband of an injured writer and uncovers a horrifying truth; the basis of the movie. | 162 | 5 | 4 | BRAIN DAMAGE, by Freida McFadden. (Poisoned Pen) A dermatologist who took a bullet through her skull tries to piece together her memories and determine if someone close to her is a threat. | 5 | 6 | THE WOMEN, by Kristin Hannah. (St. Martin's Griffin) A nurse follows her brother to serve during the Vietnam War and returns to a divided America. | 1 | 7 | 6 | PROJECT HAIL MARY, by Andy Weir. (Ballantine) The fate of humanity rests on Ryland Grace's shoulders; the basis of the movie. | 65 | 8 | SHIELD OF SPARROWS, by Devney Perry. (Red Tower) A princess deals with various adversaries as she moves into the role she chooses for herself, not the one chosen for her. | 1 | 9 | 8 | CARL'S DOOMSDAY SCENARIO, by Matt Dinniman. (Ace) The second book in the "Dungeon Crawler Carl" series. | 7 | 10 | 7 | WILD DARK SHORE, by Charlotte McConaghy. (Flatiron) A woman washes ashore on a tiny island near Antarctica, where the only inhabitants are a man and his three children. | 3 | 11 | 10 | THE LOVE HYPOTHESIS, by Ali Hazelwood. (Berkley) A young professor agrees to pretend to be a third-year Ph.D. candidate's boyfriend. | 45 | 12 | 12 | RED RISING, by Pierce Brown. (Del Rey) A member of the lowest rung of a society on Mars in the future mixes in with humanity's overlords in the hopes of taking them down. | 14 | 13 | 9 | MY DREADFUL DARLING, by H. D. Carlton. (ZPN) Reverie Adams attempts to put her dark past behind her but Dreadful Sharpe's desire for revenge brings it back. | 3 | 14 | 13 | A COURT OF THORNS AND ROSES, by Sarah J. Maas. (Bloomsbury) Feyre is taken from her home and placed inside the world of the Fae. | 88 | 15 | 14 | THE DIVORCE, by Freida McFadden. (Poisoned Pen) After her husband ends their marriage, Naomi suspects she might be in danger. | 16 | Sales are defined as completed transactions between vendors and individual end users during the period on or after the official publication date of a title. Sales of titles are statistically weighted to represent and accurately reflect all outlets proportionally nationwide. The panel of reporting retailers is comprehensive and reflects sales in tens of thousands of stores of all sizes and demographics across the United States. ONLINE: For a full explanation of our methodology, visit www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers.
---
Make busy mornings less of a scramble.

Explore recipe collections like Breakfast in 10 Minutes or Less.
nytcooking.com
Reporting on climate from every continent.
The award-winning author remembers the man she counted among her most important literary mentors.
A GREAT MENTOR gives us the confidence to look ahead to our own work while we still feel that gentle hand at our back, always there to help move us along. I've felt Wendell Berry's literary hand between my shoulder blades for such a majority of my life that, after his death in August at the age of 92, it's a shock to wake up into a day without him in this world. The only words I want to read right now are his. "Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front," for a start, advises me this morning to ask the questions that have no answers. To invest in the millennium.
... Plant sequoias.
Say that your main crop is the forest
that you did not plant,
that you will not live to harvest.
Say that the leaves are harvested
when they have rotted into the mold.
Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.
The manifesto further instructs me to put my faith in humus, listen to carrion, expect the end of the world and laugh. To swear allegiance to my better self with the courage of insurrection:
As soon as the generals and the politicos can predict the motions of your mind, lose it. Leave it as a sign to mark the false trail, the way you didn't go. Be like the fox who makes more tracks than necessary, some in the wrong direction. Practice resurrection.
Wendell and I grew up a generation apart but joined in a culture that puts great stock in neighborly civility. We rural folk are mostly polite. It helps us to get along, get invited back, and sometimes sneak mutiny in the door. Even in the fanciest company. Even in church. This is the power of Wendell Berry. He was a welcoming, funny, gentle-spoken man who knew what was right — unfailingly, it seems to me. He could deliver it on the page with such lyrical self-possession, the reader might take a while to register the volley of interior explosions. You're left with fresh truth and some reckoning on your hands, and a clear sense that it was a gift.
As a writer he distinguished himself early, first as a Stegner fellow at Stanford and then on the faculty of New York University, acclaimed by the literati but uneasy with the growing distance between himself and his home. His academic peers warned him against leaving the cultural capital; they surely thought a Kentucky farmer-poet would be doomed as a literary nobody.
It turned out, becoming “somebody” meant something different to Wendell than it did to them. “The Long-Legged House,” his first book of essays, from 1969, argued for the part of our humanity that rests in belonging. Without the people and place that made us, we risk losing our whole selves. A farm in Kentucky was the God’s honest truth of Wendell Berry, the writer and the man. “What I stand for is what I stand on,” he said, and spent the rest of his life proving it.
It's a well-beaten path for rural kids: Go out and seek your fortune. I followed it myself, lured away from Kentucky by some combination of embarrassment for the homely and the shine of what's generally called opportunity. Yet having entered its temple, I found nothing worth saying until I could claim the place I'm from, as a cultural capital of its own surprising kind. I have a handful of writers to thank for lighting my circular path home, but mostly Wendell Berry.
People who live and work in land-based economies are well accustomed to being called backward by the more urbane, and Berry's work has sometimes borne this slight. But he was the opposite of backward; he was prescient. "The Unsettling of America" (1977), his seminal text on the dangers of our estrangement from the land that feeds us,

Wendell Berry in 2012.
---
is more urgently true today than when he wrote it five decades ago. If any readers still doubt that a farmer could have much to tell them, it's their loss.
His essays, the Sabbath Poems, the Port William novels — “Hannah Coulter,” “Jayber Crow,” “The Memory of Old Jack,” all quiet on the surface — are lakes of sleek astonishments. The possibilities of life in a small place are a mirror to the world, because let’s face it, every place is its own kind of small. It’s a universal clemency to find delight in what we have instead of craving what we don’t, and likewise, a balm to any existential dread to consider that “the fragment of the earth/that is now me” is just passing through: “It is on its way/from having been a tree,/a school of fish, a terrapin,/a flock of birds. It will pass/through all those forms again.”
Who doesn't want to be a flock of birds someday? Returning here to "Manifesto," we can all use instruction on how to "Be joyful/though you have considered all the facts."
His novels walk the unpaved roads between birth and death with an aching blend of human comedy and grace.
His poems hold the sacred in the palm of their hand. In service of what might be taken for simplicity, his logical currents are clear and complex; his essays contain multitudes. One of his most famous, "Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer," challenges our devotion to technological fundamentalism — not because Berry was a Luddite, or failed to appreciate his wife, Tanya, as an editor, typist and invaluable partner. Nor did he oppose a tool that helps us do good work. Rather, he saw danger in the conviction that new things are always better than old things. (If you're a mortal human, you might think on that.) He saw the waste of endlessly buying solutions to problems we don't have, and tragedy in an elusive happiness built on constantly changing out our possessions and selves: a damaging doctrine for those who can't afford it, and also for those who can.
Most of all, he had the rare vision to see a thing, any thing, not just at the moment of acquisition but through its whole passage from mineral extraction, the mess of manufacture and transport to the consumer and beyond, to the desecration we call “landfill.” He nudged us to do the same, and to have the courage to ask, “Is my need important enough to inflict this injury on the world?” He didn’t say do, or don’t. He just said to look. Widen your gaze, and look again.
I can't remember a time when I didn't know about Wendell Berry. My grandmother talked about "that fellow that doesn't like a tractor" when I was young enough to picture a noble draft horse versus our noisy John Deere, and heartily agree that less is more. He and my father — coincidentally both named Wendell — worked together to help preserve some beautiful, threatened parts of Kentucky, in their shared belief that such wild places are sacred. When I saw him soon after my father died, Wendell told me, "They come back to us."
It's the truest, kindest counsel I've ever known for grief, perfectly rendered in his poem "The Loved Ones." In those first days we are sodden with deprivation and the loss itself: accident, illness or final decline. It's only with time that "the loved ones we call the dead" return as their full selves into our memories and dreams, and then:
We feel they have been near us when we have not thought of them. They are simply here, simply waiting while we are distracted among our obligations. At last it comes to us: They live now in the permanent world. We are the absent ones.
I'm taking that counsel today. He'll come back to us. He is here now, in these words. His poem "Stay Home" promises:
I will be standing in the woods where the old trees move only with the wind and then with gravity. In the stillness of the trees I am at home. Don't come with me. You stay home too.
A giant tree has surrendered to gravity. No, not surrendered. Accepted. I'll take Wendell's instruction to stay here, in these fragments of the earth that are still me, and use them while I can, to nurture a place, a family, a spiritual trust, a neighbor. To call that home, and carry on.
BARBARA KINGSOLVER is the author of 10 novels, most recently the Pulitzer Prize-winning "Demon Copperhead." Her new novel, "Partita," will be published this month.


---
In grade school, an imaginative pal and I tried to turn recess into a game of Calvin-ball. That, err, sport, from Bill Watterson's delightful "Calvin and Hobbes" comic strip, has only one rule: "You can't play it the same way twice."
Perhaps the anarchy that ensued explains my middle-school embrace of Dungeons & Dragons rule books.
My teenage reading tastes skewed speculative, toward books that abided by the precise rules of their worlds. Flights of fancy were all well and good as long as they were hemmed in by some logic, however whimsical or wondrous. In novels that heavily employ world-building, a few regulations always go a long way. Each of these two very different books fits the bill.
---
Peake was perhaps the most stylish English fantasist of the first half of the 20th century — in his prose, his clothes and his pose. He's mentioned far less often than he deserves, though when he is, it's often in the same breath as his contemporaries J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.
Those aren't perfect comparisons. The first two books in Peake's incomplete masterwork, his Gormenghast series, are as epic as "The Lord of the Rings" or the Narnia novels. But instead of sweeping allegory, they trade in a sort of gothic, absurdist class satire. Also, there's no magic.
Gormenghast is an impossibly large, labyrinthine, moldering castle inhabited by what a Washington Post critic once called "conniving Dickensian grotesques," with delicious names like Alfred Prunesquallor and Abiatha Swelter. (Guess which one is the cook.)
Then there is Titus Groan, the future 77th Earl of Gormenghast. In the first book of the series, he is born and inherits his title near the end of his infancy. Around him, peculiar adults lead lives governed by arcane rites as timeless and decayed as the stronghold that keeps them. Even breakfast adheres to ceremony: Throughout it, the master of rituals reads aloud the rest of that day's rituals.
Peake's own language is as tortuous as his mythos. And yet it sings. "Drear ritual turned its wheel," he writes. "The ferment of the heart, within these walls, was mocked by every length of sleeping shadow. The passions, no greater than candle flames, flickered in Time's yawn, for Gormenghast, huge and adumbrate, out-crumbles all."
If you like listening to your lore, Simon Vance's audiobook rendition is more than worth your time. And do try your luck at ferreting out the rather bonkers but unfairly maligned BBC mini-series.
READ IF YOU LIKE: "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell," by Susanna Clarke; "Rebecca," by Daphne du Maurier; the witch scenes in "Macbeth," specifically; candles scented with tobacco, heather and/or bog myrtle.
---
Stop me if you've read this one before: A young woman forms a psychic bond with a dragon, rises to prominence within a patriarchal institution and gets entangled in a romance with a powerful dragon-rider.
But “Fourth Wing,” Rebecca Yarros’s blockbuster fantasy, this is not. If McCaffrey were alive today, she’d be 100 — and if you called her a romantasy writer, she might breathe more fire at you than all her and Yarros’s dragons combined ever could.
“Dragonflight” kicks off the influential Dragonriders of Pern series, which, despite its quasi-medieval setting and fire-breathing beasties, McCaffrey considered science fiction. (No magic here, either.)
Pern is a planet once settled by space-faring Earthlings, whose origins and technology have been largely lost to time. Its dragons were genetically engineered. An insentient, threadlike alien spore unspools from the sky at intervals determined by the eccentric orbit of its native rogue planet. Plus there's some time travel.
Most have forgotten why many of Pern's laws exist. It's been well over a century since the last alien threat. Why should the Pernese worry about little patches of grass growing in the grooves of their stonework feudal holds? What do you mean, that extraterrestrial material excruciatingly consumes all organic matter in its path?
Before their fellow inhabitants learn the answers to those questions the deadly way, the vengeful orphan Lessa has to bond with a golden dragon queen and work with an aloof dragon-rider, F'lar, to save the world. Though the stakes are high, this isn't a traditional page-turner; Pernese history and politics are too complex for that. But the richness of Pern's world makes it harder to leave after every visit — even if you'd never want to live there.
READ IF YOU LIKE: Mercedes Lackey's Valdemar series; Christopher Paolini's Inheritance Cycle; the frisson of adopting a pet and instantly becoming its favorite thing on Earth; endless debates over whether George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series is secretly science fiction.
We bring the best of the literary conversation to you.
The New York Times
The Book Review
Podcast
"The Book Review" podcast, hosted by Book Review Editor Gilbert Cruz and powered by The New York Times. Today's top authors and critics join editors from the world's most influential book review to talk about what they're reading and what's driving the literary conversation.
New episodes every week. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. nytimes.com/bookreviewpodcast
📰 报刊故事还原:“阅读不是一种爱好。它是我人生中的第一次‘搞钱’(hustle),”这位喜剧演员在他的新回忆录《九条命,没有妻子,以及 69 个妾》(Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines)中写道,书中还解释了他为何
📰 报刊故事还原:小时候,有很多东西是我接触不到的,但我可以接触到书。所以如果有什么我想理解的东西,我可以去找一本相关的书。历史、宗教、商业、科学、人物。我可以自学。这就是为什么我称之为我的第一次“搞钱”。所谓“搞钱”(hustle),就是想办法利用你拥有的
📰 报刊故事还原:因为我到处自称“戴帽子的卡特”(Katt in the Hat)并以此赚钱。显然,这会让你收到一份停止并终止函。我当时只是一个试图出名的年轻喜剧演员,没有考虑商标或知识产权。我想的是,“戴帽子的卡特——这很有趣”。而他们的想法则完全不同。
“阅读不是一种爱好。它是我人生中的第一次‘搞钱’(hustle),”这位喜剧演员在他的新回忆录《九条命,没有妻子,以及 69 个妾》(Nine Lives, No Wives, and 69 Concubines)中写道,书中还解释了他为何
小时候,有很多东西是我接触不到的,但我可以接触到书。所以如果有什么我想理解的东西,我可以去找一本相关的书。历史、宗教、商业、科学、人物。我可以自学。这就是为什么我称之为我的第一次“搞钱”。所谓“搞钱”(hustle),就是想办法利用你拥有的
因为我到处自称“戴帽子的卡特”(Katt in the Hat)并以此赚钱。显然,这会让你收到一份停止并终止函。我当时只是一个试图出名的年轻喜剧演员,没有考虑商标或知识产权。我想的是,“戴帽子的卡特——这很有趣”。而他们的想法则完全不同。
采访片段、新闻报道、历史和文学评论。他钦佩罗伯逊·戴维斯、玛格丽特·艾特伍德和梅维斯·加兰特的作品,尽管爱丽丝·门罗的故事一直让他感到冷漠。“我觉得它们太长且冗赘,”他抱怨道,“它们的景观过于理智、焦虑且局限于室内。”
对于阿里·埃马纽埃尔来说,争吵、世仇和侮辱不过是日常工作的一部分,他在一部新回忆录中对其职业生涯进行了毫无掩饰的回顾。
家庭:离不开,也相处不来。除了长期的心理分析对象,还有谁比那些通过反抗混乱、黏稠且——在最理想的情况下——充满养分的纽带来尝试独立的孩子更懂得这一点?这是一个贯穿了无数经典儿童文学作品的主题。
Kuang 是一位成功的奇幻小说作家,在这部关于一名在台湾漂泊的美国学生的现实主义小说中,她再次探讨了语言与帝国之间的联系。通过聚焦于期中考试、姐妹关系和性等日常戏剧,她证明了自己在文学小说方面的造诣与在投机小说(speculative f
在这部关于弗吉尼亚州 Blow 种植园的详尽研究中——该地距离 1831 年纳特·特纳(Nat Turner)起义的地点不远——普利策奖得主、历史学家 Taylor 试图将传统与真相区分开来,仔细审视美国奴隶主内心交织的高尚同情心与令人胆寒
这位获奖作家回忆起她将其视为最重要的文学导师之一的男人。